Consider the scope/need of "issues" on this repository

Open
#78 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
25/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
github
Domain
devtools

Research direction

Review the linked ome/ngff issue and the repository's GitHub issue, Wiki, and Discussions settings. First determine whether this repository should centralize issues in ome/ngff or define separate scopes; done means the maintainers have chosen and applied a clear policy, including the proposed Wiki and Discussions changes.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Currently it is a bit unclear which issues go on "ngff" and which issues go on "ngff-spec".

E.g.

Some options include:

  • Disabling "Issues" here and redirecting all issues to ome/ngff. (my choice, for centralizing things)
  • Clarifying which issues go where

IMHO people will likely get confused on the scope of which, but there may be advantages of having the two forums.

Definitely "Wiki" and "Discussions" should be disabled here.

It is possible to close issues across repositories automatically too, so we could use that trick.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
14
Forks
19
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Getting set up

This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from ome/ngff-spec

All issues in ome/ngff-spec

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.