structured `void` dtypes
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
Research direction
Start by reviewing the existing typing for the void scalar and the numpy.lib.recfunctions stubs. Define how optional nested .fields mappings and possibly .shape should be represented generically, then update the related recfunctions types. Done means void supports the intended precise TypedDict-based structure and the dependent stubs remain consistent.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
The void scalar type should be made generic, with parameters bound to the (optional) nested field dtypes (.fields), and perhaps also its shape (.shape).
The fields type parameter should be bound to Mapping[str, tuple[dtype, int] | tuple[dtype, int, str]] | None, so that a TypedDict can be used to precisely specify the structure.
Note to self: Once implemented, be sure to also update the numpy.lib.recfunctions accordingly.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 79
- Forks
- 8
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from numpy/numtype
-
topic: documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
topic: documentation
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
blame: Pyright tool: basedpyright
-
numpy.generic stubs: Incomplete
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
_numtype stubs: Refactor
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
Similar issues
-
essnmx good first issue
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 95/100
-
[Feature] 奇物选择添加优先级 Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
syfoud/Simulated_Scepter#174 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
Giskard-AI/giskard-oss#2840 · 1 comment ·
-
A claim comment carrying the issue number is silently declined while the workflow reports success Openarea: repo bug perceived difficulty: 2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
yeti-platform/yeti#1380 ·