Track OpenSSF Scorecard security follow-ups
Maintainers usually reply within 3 days
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
Research direction
No file or test entry point is named. Start by locating the Rust protocol parsing and deserialization code, then identify suitable fuzz targets and assess continuous OSS-Fuzz integration. Done means fuzzing coverage is added for those paths and the OSS-Fuzz option is evaluated.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Context
OpenSSF Scorecard identified several follow-up opportunities while validating #1214.
Follow-up work
- Pin all GitHub Actions to immutable full commit SHAs, retaining version comments for readability — #1216
- Pin the commitlint packages installed dynamically in CI — #1217
- Establish restrictive top-level
GITHUB_TOKENpermission defaults — #1218 - Remove unnecessary
contents: writefrom the coverage job inci.yml— #1219 - Tighten
release-plz.ymlpermissions by moving write grants to job scope — #1220 - Pin the temporary release-plz fork to an immutable revision — #1221
- Add fuzzing coverage for protocol parsing/deserialization and consider continuous OSS-Fuzz integration.
The linked PRs are intentionally focused so permission and dependency changes can be reviewed independently.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 4k
- Forks
- 648
- Avg merge
- 3d 21h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 34
Getting set up
Starts the project's dev container in your browser, under your own GitHub account.
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk
-
P3 question T-documentation T-enhancement
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 86/100
modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk#1155 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 3 days
-
Bound pre-lifecycle bootstrap attempts in server initializationPossibly taken @DaleSeo claimed this today. Openenhancement P2 T-service T-transport
modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk#1315 · 1 assignee ·
Maintainers usually reply within 3 days
-
ProgressDispatcher: a slow progress subscriber blocks subscribe() and delivery for other tokensOpenbug P1 ready for work T-handler
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk#1312 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 3 days
-
transport::stdio() runs every read and write on tokio's blocking pool, which caps stdio throughputOpenenhancement P2 T-transport
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 58/100
modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk#1301 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 3 days
-
bug P1 ready for work T-security T-transport
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 74/100
modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk#1298 · 1 comment · 1 reaction ·
Maintainers usually reply within 3 days
All issues in modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk
Similar issues
-
area:release bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
registrystack/registry-stack#1874 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
component:midnight-toolkit status:untriaged
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
midnightntwrk/midnight-node#2237 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 78/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day