Trailing whitespace strip in <pre> is quadratic on a long whitespace run
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 78/100
Research direction
The slow step is re_pre_rstrip.sub in strip_pre in markdownify/init.py, around line 78; the issue proposes replacing it with a str.rstrip call. Read the re_pre_lstrip and re_pre_rstrip definitions, then reproduce with a 64 KB <pre> block of trailing spaces through markdownify(). Done means that case runs in well under a second, the existing 83-test suite still passes, and a new timing test covers the <pre> spellings listed in the issue.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
strip_pre() takes quadratic time on a <pre> block whose trailing whitespace run is a run of spaces not ended by a newline. Measured through markdownify() on tag 1.2.3, both trees in one isolated run:
| HTML | before | after |
|---|---|---|
| 16,000 B | 0.6881 s | 0.0003 s |
| 32,000 B | 2.6570 s | 0.0004 s |
| 65,536 B | 9.1117 s | 0.0007 s |
| 131,072 B | 35.5100 s | 0.0014 s |
| 16,000 B of ordinary words | 0.0011 s | 0.0009 s |
Each doubling of the block quadruples the time, so the cost belongs to the shape rather than the size - the last row is a document of the same size that converts in a millisecond. The input is an HTML document, so nothing bounds it, and this is the default path: strip_pre defaults to STRIP, while STRIP_ONE uses the separate re_pre_rstrip1 = r'\n *$' and is unaffected.
Cause. re_pre_rstrip = re.compile(r'[ \n]*$') applied with .sub() at __init__.py:78. .sub restarts at every position in the string, and at each one the unbounded [ \n]* run expands and then backtracks looking for the $ that the following character denies.
It is worth saying why the costly shape is spaces and not newlines, because it is not obvious from the pattern alone: re_pre_lstrip = r'^[ \n]*\n' runs on the line before, so a leading newline run is consumed there and re_pre_rstrip is handed a one-character string. With no newline in the block, lstrip does not fire and rstrip receives the whole thing. On the same 65,536-byte input a newline run costs 0.0001 s and a space run 9.3704 s.
Fix. The docstring already describes a strip, so use one:
- text = re_pre_rstrip.sub('', text)
+ text = text.rstrip(' \n')
Verification.
- Test suite on both trees at tag
1.2.3: 83 passed, unchanged, with each run asserting whichmarkdownify/__init__.pywas loaded and whether it still contains the regex call. - Differential: 0 differences from current behaviour across all 29,524 strings of length 0 to 9 over
{space, newline, x}- the whole alphabet the two patterns act on. - A new test converts a 64 KB
<pre>block in under 0.5 s and checks seven<pre>spellings (blank lines, leading and trailing spaces, indentation, empty, whitespace-only). On1.2.3the timing test fails and the behaviour test passes. - Shapes aimed at the fix rather than the original (pure space run with no terminator, a leading
xthen a run, many short runs split byx) are all flat: worst 0.0003 s at 65,536 B.
re_pre_rstrip is now unused. I have deliberately left the definition in place to keep the diff to one line, since it is a module-level name that something downstream may import; say the word and I will remove it.
I am happy to open a pull request with the patch if that is easier.
Found with AI assistance (Claude) and verified by hand.
Patch: full patch
--- a/markdownify/__init__.py
+++ b/markdownify/__init__.py
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
def strip_pre(text):
"""Strip all leading and trailing newlines from a <pre> string."""
text = re_pre_lstrip.sub('', text)
- text = re_pre_rstrip.sub('', text)
+ text = text.rstrip(' \n')
return text
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 2.3k
- Forks
- 205
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from matthewwithanm/python-markdownify
-
RecursionError on deeply nested HTML (about 330 levels), separate from the cyclic-tree case in #256Possibly taken @HardMax71 claimed this 37 days ago. Open
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Image/link attributes containing `]`, `)`, or spaces produce broken Markdown outputPossibly taken @assinscreedFC claimed this 127 days ago. Open
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 52/100
matthewwithanm/python-markdownify#261 · 1 comment · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 65/100
matthewwithanm/python-markdownify#259 · 2 reactions ·
-
Recursion Error: Process_element / process_tag mutual recursion (infinite loop)Possibly taken @chiliec claimed this 44 days ago. Open
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 50/100
-
Behavior with strip_pre=mdfy.STRIP_ONE seems incorrect with trailing newlines within the prePossibly taken @oiahoon claimed this 90 days ago. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 50/100
All issues in matthewwithanm/python-markdownify
Similar issues
-
enhancement good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
python-version
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug javascript P2-medium python release:v3.1
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
adrirubio/claude-deck#546 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area: desktop area: website priority: P2 type: feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
appandflow/stim#3411 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day