Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

OkHttpWebsocketSession does not complete the `closeReason` future when closing the websocket in absence of connectivity

Open
#8,678 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Maintainers usually reply within 1 day

@jcovington16 is already working on this.

Since Mar 5, 2025.

  • #9188 by @MohitAnuragi — closed without merging

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
25/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
kotlin
Domain
networking

Research direction

Start by reading OkHttpWebsocketSession and the RealWebSocket callbacks mentioned in the issue, focusing on how closeReason is completed by onClosing, onClosed, and onFailure. Reproduce the described disconnect-and-close sequence with ping-pong disabled; done means the coroutine awaiting closeReason terminates when the websocket is closed without connectivity.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

bug

Hello! 👋
I encountered this issue while doing some tests for the reliability of my ktor-based client application.

Reproduction steps

  • Initialize a ktor application with websocket and where the built-in ping-pong mechanism is disabled.
  • Launch 2 coroutines: Coroutine 1 communicates through websocket with a server external to the machine, Coroutine 2 awaits the completion of the closeReason Future through DefaultWebSocketSession.closeReason.
  • Disconnect the machine from the internet.
  • Close the websocket.

Actual Behaviour
Coroutine 1 terminates while Coroutine 2 hangs forever.

Expected Behaviour
Coroutine 2 should also terminate, as closeReason should complete.

Analysis
Looking at the code, my understanding of the reason of this behaviour is that, in the OkHttpWebsocketSession class, the closeReason future is completed only in one of these 3 method: onClosing, onClosed, or onFailure.

  • onFailure is not called by the RealWebSocket implementation when the connection drops because we disabled the built-in ping/pong mechanism in favour of a custom one.
  • onClosing and onClose are not called when the websocket is closed unless a control frame (OPCODE_CONTROL_CLOSE) is sent by the server, event that cannot happen under these conditions.

Additional Information
On the other hand, the CIO engine manages to complete the closeReason future under the same assumptions.

Question
Is this a design choice or just a bug due to a very niche condition?

Dominant language
Kotlin
Stars
47.1k
Forks
9.3k
Avg merge
18h 18m
Merged PRs (30d)
15

Getting set up

This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from lysine-dev/okhttp

All issues in lysine-dev/okhttp

Similar issues

More Kotlin issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.