Proposal: API to Separate Graph Building from Weight Loading to Reduce Peak Memory Usage
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 6/100
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 明瞭さ
- 説明が足りない
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 技術スタック
- javascript
- 領域
- ai, api, performance
調査の方向性
This is a design proposal, not a bug to fix. Start with the proposed builder.constant(), builder.build(), graph.setConstantData() and context.dispatch() semantics, and check whether the backends can support weightless graph creation. The thread has been quiet for about 300 days with no linked pull request, so ask the maintainers whether the direction is still wanted before writing anything. Done means an agreed spec change, not a patch.
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
Problem Statement
While analyzing the memory-consumption of the Stable Diffusion demo on a dGPU system, I observed that the CPU memory used during graph building is more than 3x the actual model size. Similar high-memory-usage behavior (requiring multiple times the model size) is also observed on iGPU systems, although the exact multiplier may differ.
While this might be irrelevant for smaller models, it presents a significant overhead for larger ones. For example:
- A 4GB model can consume over 12GB of CPU memory during its load phase on a dGPU.
- This is already critical on systems with 16GB of total memory.
This issue is even more pronounced on UVM (Unified Memory) systems where the CPU and GPU/NPU share memory. This high peak usage during loading unnecessarily consumes memory that could otherwise be allocated for the model weights and intermediate buffers on the device.
Proposal
I'd like to propose introducing an API that splits graph creation from weight passing (i.e., loading the constant data).
The primary goal is to enable streaming weights directly into the graph during initialization. This would avoid creating copies of the weights in JavaScript or in the backend's staging memory before the graph is fully built. Ideally, the weight data would only be copied once, from its source buffer directly to its final (e.g., device) location when the data is provided to the graph after it has been built.
This raises a key question for discussion:
- Would all current WebNN backends be able to support a (mostly) "weightless" graph creation, where all tensor shapes and data types are known, but the actual weight data is not provided until a later step?
Potential Implementation Idea
One potential solution could look like this:
- Allow
builder.constant()to be called with just anMLOperandDescriptor(defining the shape and data type), without requiring theArrayBufferViewdata source. - This call would return an
MLOperandobject that acts as a handle for this "hollow constant" (a tensor without its data). - Allow
builder.build()to succeed usingMLOperands that represent these hollow constants, creating the executableMLGraph. - Introduce a new method on the
MLGraphinterface, such as:
graph.setConstantData(constantOperand, dataBuffer) - After the
MLGraphis built (step 3), the user must call this newsetConstantData()method for every hollow constant they created. At this stage, the backend can perform any required conversions and transfer thedataBufferdirectly to device memory. context.dispatch()would require all constants to be set. Attempting to calldispatch()before all hollow constants have been supplied with data (viasetConstantData) would result in an error.
Expected Benefits
This change would significantly reduce peak memory pressure during initialization:
- dGPU Systems: In an ideal scenario, this could limit the peak CPU memory overhead to 1x-2x the size of the largest single tensor (for temporary buffering during upload), rather than 3x the entire model.
- iGPU/UVM Systems: The hope is that no temporary CPU-side storage would be needed for the "upload" (as it's shared memory). This would reduce the total peak CPU memory consumption down to roughly
Model Size + Max Single Tensor Size.
- 主要言語
- Bikeshed
- スター
- 566
- フォーク
- 72
- 平均マージ
- 6日 5時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 1
環境構築
- Dockerfile・Docker Compose ファイルなし
- プルリクエストのテンプレートなし
- コントリビューションガイドを読む
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
webmachinelearning/webnn のほかの issue
-
難易度 5/5 1週間以上 初心者へのやさしさ 35/100
webmachinelearning/webnn#967 ·
-
難易度 5/5 1週間以上 初心者へのやさしさ 25/100
webmachinelearning/webnn#966 · コメント 1 件 ·
-
難易度 5/5 1週間以上 初心者へのやさしさ 35/100
webmachinelearning/webnn#965 · コメント 1 件 ·
-
難易度 3/5 1〜2日 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
webmachinelearning/webnn#964 · コメント 1 件 · リアクション 1 件 ·
-
難易度 5/5 1週間以上 初心者へのやさしさ 30/100
webmachinelearning/webnn#963 · コメント 3 件 · リアクション 2 件 ·
webmachinelearning/webnn の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 76/100
harmeetsingh11/RefactorMate#494 · コメント 1 件 ·
-
[BUG][GroupChat, HierarchicalSwarm, PlannerWorkerSwarm][A run clears the turns seeded from a non-empty channel]対応中かも @ayaangazali が今日担当しました。 オープンai-generated
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 83/100
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
bug
難易度 1/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 90/100
Jeffallan/claude-skills#270 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
[bug] Sidecar parent conversation truncation counts UTF-16 units and can split an emoji対応中かも @sun-sh が今日担当しました。 オープンneeds-triage
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 72/100
メンテナーはふだん 2 日以内に返信