Proposal: API to Separate Graph Building from Weight Loading to Reduce Peak Memory Usage
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 6/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Da chiarire
- Stato di attività
- Ferma
- Stack tecnologico
- javascript
- Ambito
- ai, api, performance
Direzione di ricerca
This is a design proposal, not a bug to fix. Start with the proposed builder.constant(), builder.build(), graph.setConstantData() and context.dispatch() semantics, and check whether the backends can support weightless graph creation. The thread has been quiet for about 300 days with no linked pull request, so ask the maintainers whether the direction is still wanted before writing anything. Done means an agreed spec change, not a patch.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Problem Statement
While analyzing the memory-consumption of the Stable Diffusion demo on a dGPU system, I observed that the CPU memory used during graph building is more than 3x the actual model size. Similar high-memory-usage behavior (requiring multiple times the model size) is also observed on iGPU systems, although the exact multiplier may differ.
While this might be irrelevant for smaller models, it presents a significant overhead for larger ones. For example:
- A 4GB model can consume over 12GB of CPU memory during its load phase on a dGPU.
- This is already critical on systems with 16GB of total memory.
This issue is even more pronounced on UVM (Unified Memory) systems where the CPU and GPU/NPU share memory. This high peak usage during loading unnecessarily consumes memory that could otherwise be allocated for the model weights and intermediate buffers on the device.
Proposal
I'd like to propose introducing an API that splits graph creation from weight passing (i.e., loading the constant data).
The primary goal is to enable streaming weights directly into the graph during initialization. This would avoid creating copies of the weights in JavaScript or in the backend's staging memory before the graph is fully built. Ideally, the weight data would only be copied once, from its source buffer directly to its final (e.g., device) location when the data is provided to the graph after it has been built.
This raises a key question for discussion:
- Would all current WebNN backends be able to support a (mostly) "weightless" graph creation, where all tensor shapes and data types are known, but the actual weight data is not provided until a later step?
Potential Implementation Idea
One potential solution could look like this:
- Allow
builder.constant()to be called with just anMLOperandDescriptor(defining the shape and data type), without requiring theArrayBufferViewdata source. - This call would return an
MLOperandobject that acts as a handle for this "hollow constant" (a tensor without its data). - Allow
builder.build()to succeed usingMLOperands that represent these hollow constants, creating the executableMLGraph. - Introduce a new method on the
MLGraphinterface, such as:
graph.setConstantData(constantOperand, dataBuffer) - After the
MLGraphis built (step 3), the user must call this newsetConstantData()method for every hollow constant they created. At this stage, the backend can perform any required conversions and transfer thedataBufferdirectly to device memory. context.dispatch()would require all constants to be set. Attempting to calldispatch()before all hollow constants have been supplied with data (viasetConstantData) would result in an error.
Expected Benefits
This change would significantly reduce peak memory pressure during initialization:
- dGPU Systems: In an ideal scenario, this could limit the peak CPU memory overhead to 1x-2x the size of the largest single tensor (for temporary buffering during upload), rather than 3x the entire model.
- iGPU/UVM Systems: The hope is that no temporary CPU-side storage would be needed for the "upload" (as it's shared memory). This would reduce the total peak CPU memory consumption down to roughly
Model Size + Max Single Tensor Size.
- Lingua principale
- Bikeshed
- Stelle
- 566
- Fork
- 72
- Merge medio
- 6g 5h
- PR unite (30g)
- 1
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di webmachinelearning/webnn
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 35/100
webmachinelearning/webnn#967 ·
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 25/100
webmachinelearning/webnn#966 · 1 commento ·
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 35/100
webmachinelearning/webnn#965 · 1 commento ·
-
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 68/100
webmachinelearning/webnn#964 · 1 commento · 1 reazione ·
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 30/100
webmachinelearning/webnn#963 · 3 commenti · 2 reazioni ·
Tutte le issue di webmachinelearning/webnn
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 85/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Bug] OpenAI-compatible Gemini 工具 schema const 导致 400Forse già presa Una pull request collegata a questa issue è aperta o già unita. Apertabug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 77/100
AstrBotDevs/AstrBot#10720 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 85/100
slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents#841 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Bug Platform Status: Needs Review
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
wiki: parent and overview pages link to guessed page slugs, so cross-page links are brokenForse già presa Una pull request collegata a questa issue è aperta o già unita. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
abhigyanpatwari/GitNexus#3704 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno