[Bug] Nondeterminism replaying local activity markers recorded after a FORCE_CLOSE_COMMAND workflow task failure (1.34.0)
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 8/100
- issue の種類
- バグ
- 明瞭さ
- おおむね明確
- 活発さ
- 活発
- 技術スタック
- python
調査の方向性
The failure is a replay nondeterminism error, Missing associated machine for LocalActivity(1719), raised when Replayer reprocesses the downloaded history. Start by reproducing it from the sanitized marker metadata, then check how local activity results are ordered within an activation after a FORCE_CLOSE_COMMAND task failure. Done means a replay of that history succeeds without the error. This needs deep knowledge of the workflow state machine and the Rust core, so it is not a first contribution.
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
What are you really trying to do?
A workflow fans out ~900 regular activities with asyncio.gather. A workflow outbound interceptor records progress with a local activity: at most one is in flight, and when it resolves a done callback starts the next one with the changes accumulated in the meantime. (We have replaced it with a regular activity as a workaround.)
Describe the bug
While results streamed in, workflow tasks took 2.5-6 s and the server failed them 12 times with WORKFLOW_TASK_FAILED_CAUSE_FORCE_CLOSE_COMMAND (51-139 activity completions arrived during each task). After one of those, the next workflow task (started 08:52:05.021Z, completed 08:52:08.319Z) recorded, in this order:
- local activity marker seq 1296 (
activation_index1,original_schedule_time08:52:04.597Z,complete_time08:52:00.700Z) - 422 x ScheduleActivityTask (seq 1297-1718)
- local activity marker seq 1719 (
activation_index1,original_schedule_time08:52:04.637Z,complete_time08:52:02.229Z) - 49 x ScheduleActivityTask
- local activity markers seq 1769 (
activation_index2) and 1770 (activation_index3)
The complete_time of 1296 and 1719 is before that task started, so both ran during the force-closed attempt (08:52:00.674Z-08:52:04.941Z) and their results were handed to the next attempt.
Any later full replay of this history fails with:
[TMPRL1100] Nondeterminism error: Missing associated machine for LocalActivity(1719)
Replaying the downloaded history with Replayer, the same workflow code and temporalio 1.34.0 fails the same way, so the SDK cannot replay a history it wrote. On the live worker the workflow task kept failing until we terminated the workflow (114 attempts over 16 hours).
Our reading (may be wrong): in the original activation 1, the 1296 result was delivered after the 422 activity resolutions, so the next local activity got seq 1719. activation_index keeps 1296 in activation 1 but not its position among the other resolutions in that activation, so on replay the next local activity gets a different seq.
Minimal Reproduction
We don't have a minimal reproduction yet. The history contains customer data, so we can't attach it, but we can share sanitized event and marker metadata or run a patched build against it.
Shape: asyncio.gather over many activities, plus an outbound interceptor that chains one local activity at a time from done callbacks, plus enough concurrent completions to trigger FORCE_CLOSE_COMMAND (default history.maximumBufferedEventsBatch = 100).
Environment/Versions
- temporalio (Python) 1.34.0, which includes "Record order LAs are resolved in WFTs" (temporalio/sdk-rust#1616); Python 3.12; Linux container
- Temporal server 1.31.1, default dynamic config
- Related: #1881 (closed), #1578 (open)
Additional context
Workaround: send the recording call as a regular activity instead of a local activity.
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 1.2k
- フォーク
- 269
- 平均マージ
- 2日 7時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 55
環境構築
- Dockerfile・Docker Compose ファイルなし
- プルリクエストのテンプレートなし
- コントリビューションガイドを読む
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
temporalio/sdk-python のほかの issue
-
bug
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
temporalio/sdk-python#496 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
Proposal: handle SIGTERM by default to initiate graceful worker shutdown対応中かも @eamsden が 10 日前に担当しました。 オープン
temporalio/sdk-python#1948 · 担当者 1 名 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
Cloud CI Skips Nexus Tests再び着手できるかも @tconley1428 が 68 日前に担当しましたが、オープン中のプルリクエストはありません。 オープン
temporalio/sdk-python#1704 · 担当者 1 名 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
難易度 4/5 3〜5日 初心者へのやさしさ 45/100
temporalio/sdk-python#1592 · コメント 8 件 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
bug
難易度 4/5 3〜5日 初心者へのやさしさ 48/100
temporalio/sdk-python#1578 · コメント 2 件 · リアクション 2 件 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
temporalio/sdk-python の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 77/100
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 76/100
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 67/100
webrecorder/warcio#209 ·
-
bug
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 76/100
Jeffy123-zhu/logspecter#20 ·
-
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 85/100
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信