[Bug] Nondeterminism replaying local activity markers recorded after a FORCE_CLOSE_COMMAND workflow task failure (1.34.0)
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 8/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- python
- Área
- distributed-systems
Línea de trabajo
The failure is a replay nondeterminism error, Missing associated machine for LocalActivity(1719), raised when Replayer reprocesses the downloaded history. Start by reproducing it from the sanitized marker metadata, then check how local activity results are ordered within an activation after a FORCE_CLOSE_COMMAND task failure. Done means a replay of that history succeeds without the error. This needs deep knowledge of the workflow state machine and the Rust core, so it is not a first contribution.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
What are you really trying to do?
A workflow fans out ~900 regular activities with asyncio.gather. A workflow outbound interceptor records progress with a local activity: at most one is in flight, and when it resolves a done callback starts the next one with the changes accumulated in the meantime. (We have replaced it with a regular activity as a workaround.)
Describe the bug
While results streamed in, workflow tasks took 2.5-6 s and the server failed them 12 times with WORKFLOW_TASK_FAILED_CAUSE_FORCE_CLOSE_COMMAND (51-139 activity completions arrived during each task). After one of those, the next workflow task (started 08:52:05.021Z, completed 08:52:08.319Z) recorded, in this order:
- local activity marker seq 1296 (
activation_index1,original_schedule_time08:52:04.597Z,complete_time08:52:00.700Z) - 422 x ScheduleActivityTask (seq 1297-1718)
- local activity marker seq 1719 (
activation_index1,original_schedule_time08:52:04.637Z,complete_time08:52:02.229Z) - 49 x ScheduleActivityTask
- local activity markers seq 1769 (
activation_index2) and 1770 (activation_index3)
The complete_time of 1296 and 1719 is before that task started, so both ran during the force-closed attempt (08:52:00.674Z-08:52:04.941Z) and their results were handed to the next attempt.
Any later full replay of this history fails with:
[TMPRL1100] Nondeterminism error: Missing associated machine for LocalActivity(1719)
Replaying the downloaded history with Replayer, the same workflow code and temporalio 1.34.0 fails the same way, so the SDK cannot replay a history it wrote. On the live worker the workflow task kept failing until we terminated the workflow (114 attempts over 16 hours).
Our reading (may be wrong): in the original activation 1, the 1296 result was delivered after the 422 activity resolutions, so the next local activity got seq 1719. activation_index keeps 1296 in activation 1 but not its position among the other resolutions in that activation, so on replay the next local activity gets a different seq.
Minimal Reproduction
We don't have a minimal reproduction yet. The history contains customer data, so we can't attach it, but we can share sanitized event and marker metadata or run a patched build against it.
Shape: asyncio.gather over many activities, plus an outbound interceptor that chains one local activity at a time from done callbacks, plus enough concurrent completions to trigger FORCE_CLOSE_COMMAND (default history.maximumBufferedEventsBatch = 100).
Environment/Versions
- temporalio (Python) 1.34.0, which includes "Record order LAs are resolved in WFTs" (temporalio/sdk-rust#1616); Python 3.12; Linux container
- Temporal server 1.31.1, default dynamic config
- Related: #1881 (closed), #1578 (open)
Additional context
Workaround: send the recording call as a regular activity instead of a local activity.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 1.2k
- Forks
- 269
- Merge medio
- 2 d 7 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 55
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de temporalio/sdk-python
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
temporalio/sdk-python#496 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Proposal: handle SIGTERM by default to initiate graceful worker shutdownPosiblemente ocupada @eamsden la tomó hace 9 días. Abierto
temporalio/sdk-python#1948 · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Cloud CI Skips Nexus TestsQuizá libre de nuevo @tconley1428 la tomó hace 68 días y no hay ningún pull request abierto. Abierto
temporalio/sdk-python#1704 · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Windows ARM64 wheel supportAbierto
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
temporalio/sdk-python#1592 · 8 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
temporalio/sdk-python#1578 · 2 comentarios · 2 reacciones ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de temporalio/sdk-python
Issues similares
-
bug Size: XS
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
oposs/repo-infra#93 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 69/100
Graphify-Labs/graphify#4546 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
521xueweihan/HelloGitHub#4025 ·