Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

[Bug] Nondeterminism replaying local activity markers recorded after a FORCE_CLOSE_COMMAND workflow task failure (1.34.0)

Abierto
#1,976 2 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Aptitud para principiantes
8/100
Tipo de issue
Error
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
python

Línea de trabajo

The failure is a replay nondeterminism error, Missing associated machine for LocalActivity(1719), raised when Replayer reprocesses the downloaded history. Start by reproducing it from the sanitized marker metadata, then check how local activity results are ordered within an activation after a FORCE_CLOSE_COMMAND task failure. Done means a replay of that history succeeds without the error. This needs deep knowledge of the workflow state machine and the Rust core, so it is not a first contribution.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

What are you really trying to do?

A workflow fans out ~900 regular activities with asyncio.gather. A workflow outbound interceptor records progress with a local activity: at most one is in flight, and when it resolves a done callback starts the next one with the changes accumulated in the meantime. (We have replaced it with a regular activity as a workaround.)

Describe the bug

While results streamed in, workflow tasks took 2.5-6 s and the server failed them 12 times with WORKFLOW_TASK_FAILED_CAUSE_FORCE_CLOSE_COMMAND (51-139 activity completions arrived during each task). After one of those, the next workflow task (started 08:52:05.021Z, completed 08:52:08.319Z) recorded, in this order:

  • local activity marker seq 1296 (activation_index 1, original_schedule_time 08:52:04.597Z, complete_time 08:52:00.700Z)
  • 422 x ScheduleActivityTask (seq 1297-1718)
  • local activity marker seq 1719 (activation_index 1, original_schedule_time 08:52:04.637Z, complete_time 08:52:02.229Z)
  • 49 x ScheduleActivityTask
  • local activity markers seq 1769 (activation_index 2) and 1770 (activation_index 3)

The complete_time of 1296 and 1719 is before that task started, so both ran during the force-closed attempt (08:52:00.674Z-08:52:04.941Z) and their results were handed to the next attempt.

Any later full replay of this history fails with:

[TMPRL1100] Nondeterminism error: Missing associated machine for LocalActivity(1719)

Replaying the downloaded history with Replayer, the same workflow code and temporalio 1.34.0 fails the same way, so the SDK cannot replay a history it wrote. On the live worker the workflow task kept failing until we terminated the workflow (114 attempts over 16 hours).

Our reading (may be wrong): in the original activation 1, the 1296 result was delivered after the 422 activity resolutions, so the next local activity got seq 1719. activation_index keeps 1296 in activation 1 but not its position among the other resolutions in that activation, so on replay the next local activity gets a different seq.

Minimal Reproduction

We don't have a minimal reproduction yet. The history contains customer data, so we can't attach it, but we can share sanitized event and marker metadata or run a patched build against it.

Shape: asyncio.gather over many activities, plus an outbound interceptor that chains one local activity at a time from done callbacks, plus enough concurrent completions to trigger FORCE_CLOSE_COMMAND (default history.maximumBufferedEventsBatch = 100).

Environment/Versions
  • temporalio (Python) 1.34.0, which includes "Record order LAs are resolved in WFTs" (temporalio/sdk-rust#1616); Python 3.12; Linux container
  • Temporal server 1.31.1, default dynamic config
  • Related: #1881 (closed), #1578 (open)
Additional context

Workaround: send the recording call as a regular activity instead of a local activity.

Lenguaje dominante
Python
Estrellas
1.2k
Forks
269
Merge medio
2 d 7 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
55

Preparar el entorno

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de temporalio/sdk-python

Todos los issues de temporalio/sdk-python

Issues similares

Más issues de Python

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.