Hacktoberfest 2026:メンテナが10月に向けて印を付けた、オープンで初心者向けの issue。 Hacktoberfest の issue を見る

ensure results are returned even when `code-review` task doesn't run automatically

オープン
#3,740 コメント 0 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信

@bhearsum がすでに取り組んでいます。

2026年10月21日 から。

  • #3751 @bhearsum による — オープン

評価

難易度
5/5
見積もり時間
1週間以上
初心者へのやさしさ
25/100
issue の種類
機能追加
明瞭さ
説明が足りない
活発さ
活発
技術スタック
python
領域
ci-cd, devtools

調査の方向性

Start by reading the discussion in pull request 3720 and trace how the code-review task and publication task are scheduled when upstream tasks do not run. Verify the behavior of Taskcluster's taskGroupResolved exchange and compare it with the cron option described here. Done means a chosen approach reliably publishes results and resolves Phabricator builds when an upstream task is skipped.

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

Some discussion in https://github.com/mozilla/code-review/pull/3720 has highlighted the fact that it's possible for us never to publish status of a phab revision or github pull request. Because this happens in the publication task, and that publication task only runs when a code-review task completes, any issues that cause any of the direct upstream of that task not to run will result in the publication task never running. This, in turn, causes no feedback to be posted to github or phabricator, and worse yet, builds on phabricator not to be resolved. This is a more likely problem for builds and tests, but it is still possible to happen for linting as well.

It's not immediately clear to me how to deal with this. There is no way that I'm aware of to make the code-review tasks run when a direct upstream does not. Some ideas could be:

  • Run something on a cron schedule that looks for reviewbot task groups that are not doing anything, but haven't run code-review. Then, somehow kick that task to run, or directly schedule the publication task for them. The main downside to this is that unless we run this very frequently, we delay results.
  • Fire something on task-group-resolved. I believe this fires whenever a task group is idle (even if not all tasks have completed) - but this needs to be verified. This event doesn't have enough information in its payload to immediately fire a publication task; we'd need to run some small task to determine if it's a group we care about, and then to force the code-review task to run or directly schedule the publication task if it is.
主要言語
Python
スター
68
フォーク
53
平均マージ
1日 13時間
マージ済み PR(30日)
52

環境構築

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

mozilla/code-review のほかの issue

mozilla/code-review の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

Python の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。