Hacktoberfest 2026:メンテナが10月に向けて印を付けた、オープンで初心者向けの issue。 Hacktoberfest の issue を見る

Inline flags such as `(?i)` in one `-e` pattern leak into the other patterns, and indexed and scanned results disagree

クローズ
#182 コメント 0 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信

関連するプルリクエストがすでにマージされています。

  • #187 @shengyfu による — マージ済み

評価

難易度
3/5
見積もり時間
1〜2日
初心者へのやさしさ
76/100
issue の種類
バグ
明瞭さ
明確に書かれている
活発さ
活発
技術スタック
rust
領域
search

調査の方向性

Start with combine_patterns in tgrep-cli/src/matching.rs and compare how it combines multiple patterns with the per-pattern parsing in build_multi_pattern_plan in tgrep-core/src/query.rs. Add a regression test for the two reported inline-flag queries, comparing scan and indexed results. Done means inline flags affect only their own pattern and indexed, scanned, and serve results agree.

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

Summary

When several patterns are given with -e (or -f), an inline flag group such as (?i) or (?-i) at the start of one pattern also applies to the patterns after it. ripgrep scopes inline flags to the pattern they appear in.

The index planner parses each pattern on its own, so it and the matcher disagree: the same query can give different results with and without the index.

Reproduce

mkdir repro && cd repro
printf 'bar\n' > bar.txt
tgrep index .

tgrep            -i -e '(?-i)foo' -e 'BAR' .
tgrep --no-index -i -e '(?-i)foo' -e 'BAR' .
tgrep               -e '(?i)foo'  -e 'BAR' .
tgrep --no-index    -e '(?i)foo'  -e 'BAR' .
Query Actual: tgrep (index, serve) Actual: tgrep --no-index Expected: rg 15.1.0
-i -e '(?-i)foo' -e 'BAR' no match (exit 1) no match (exit 1) bar.txt:bar
-e '(?i)foo' -e 'BAR' no match (exit 1) bar.txt:bar no match (exit 1)
  • In the first query, (?-i) from foo turns -i off for BAR too, so bar is missed everywhere.
  • In the second, (?i) from foo makes BAR match bar during a scan. The index planned BAR case-sensitively and drops the file, so the indexed result differs from the scan.

With -w or -x the queries behave like ripgrep, because each pattern is then wrapped in its own group.

Environment

  • tgrep 1.1.0, built from 1120aca (current main) with rustc 1.95.0 (59807616e 2026-04-14)
  • Windows 11 Pro (build 28000); the code involved is platform-independent
  • The indexed result is the same with a local index and through tgrep serve

Cause

combine_patterns only wraps a pattern in a group for -w/-x. Otherwise it joins the raw patterns as alternatives of one group:

https://github.com/microsoft/tgrep/blob/1120aca41dd192ae61bdd996e9886cb354a78a27/tgrep-cli/src/matching.rs#L534-L539

-e '(?i)foo' -e 'BAR' becomes (?:(?i)foo|BAR). In regex syntax a bare flag group applies until the end of the enclosing group, so it reaches BAR too. build_multi_pattern_plan plans each pattern separately, where the flag does not leak.

Possible fix

Wrap every pattern in its own non-capturing group before joining, for example (?:(?i)foo)|(?:BAR), whether or not -w/-x is set. Flags then stay inside their pattern, which is also how the planner already reads them. The fancy-regex path is built from the same combined string, so it would be covered too.

A regression test could compare both queries above across --no-index, a local index and serve.

主要言語
Rust
スター
3.5k
フォーク
139
平均マージ
16時間 31分
マージ済み PR(30日)
27

環境構築

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

microsoft/tgrep のほかの issue

microsoft/tgrep の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

Rust の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。