[Bug]: preset-provided scripts are never resolved — `type: script` and `$CORE_SCRIPT` have no effect
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
- 難易度
- 4/5
- 見積もり時間
- 3〜5日
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 58/100
調査の方向性
一覧にある scaffold と re-scaffold の再現から始め、specify_cli/presets/_commands.py:495 の caller を specify_cli/presets/init.py のスクリプト処理まで追跡します。core_pack/scripts/bash/common.sh:509 と core_pack/scripts/python/common.py:308 の .md-only の解決パスを、既存のスクリプト構成ロジックおよびその unit coverage と比較します。完了の条件は、文書化されたスクリプトの動作がエンドツーエンドで機能すること、またはサポートされていないスクリプト宣言が拒否され、ドキュメントが修正されることです。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
Bug Description
The preset reference documents scripts as a first-class layer of the resolution stack:
"Presets can provide command files, template files (like
plan-template.md), and script files.
Templates and scripts are looked up from the stack when Spec Kit needs them.
Scripts support replace and wrap; script wrappers use$CORE_SCRIPTas the placeholder."
and lists the project-local override location as .specify/templates/overrides/scripts/.
None of this takes effect. A preset may declare type: script, and specify preset add accepts and
installs it without complaint, but nothing ever asks the resolver for a script, so the file that
actually runs is always the core one.
Three independent places in the shipped code show why:
- No caller requests the script type. The only production call into preset composition
determines the type as
template_type = "command" if is_command else "template"
(specify_cli/presets/_commands.py:495). The value"script"is never passed, so
PresetResolver.resolve()/collect_all_layers()are never invoked for scripts — even though
both handletemplate_type == "script"(specify_cli/presets/__init__.py:5524,5531,5613,
and the$CORE_SCRIPTsubstitution at:6168). - The Bash runtime resolves only
.md.resolve_template()in
core_pack/scripts/bash/common.sh:509looks for"$base/overrides/${template_name}.md", and
every subsequent tier appends.mdas well. There is no.shbranch and no
overrides/scripts/lookup anywhere in the file. - The Python twin mirrors that.
core_pack/scripts/python/common.py:308documents its order as
"mirrors resolve_template in scripts/bash/common.sh" and resolves
overrides/f"{template_name}.md"only.
So the composition engine for scripts exists and is reachable by unit test, but is not wired to
anything that runs.
This looks like the script half of #2132 / #2133 never landed on the runtime side, while #3143
documented it as shipped. I could not find an existing report: no open issue or PR with "script" in
the title covers it (#1964 is adjacent but is about extensions and has been open since March 2026),
and #4443 / #4445 concern PyYAML availability, not resolution.
runs the command.
Suggestion. Either wire a caller for template_type="script" and add .sh resolution to
common.sh and its Python twin, or — if scripts are not meant to be resolvable yet — adjust
docs/reference/presets.md and have preset.yml validation reject type: script so the
declaration fails loudly instead of silently.
Steps to Reproduce
# 1. Scaffold a project
mkdir demo && cd demo && git init
specify init . --integration claude --script sh --force
# 2. Record the core script's hash
sha256sum .specify/scripts/bash/setup-plan.sh
# 3a. Try the documented project-local override
mkdir -p .specify/templates/overrides/scripts
printf '#!/usr/bin/env bash\necho "OVERRIDE RAN"\n' \
> .specify/templates/overrides/scripts/setup-plan.sh
chmod +x .specify/templates/overrides/scripts/setup-plan.sh
# 3b. Or try a preset that provides the script
mkdir -p /tmp/p/scripts
cat > /tmp/p/preset.yml <<'YAML'
schema_version: "1.0"
preset:
id: "gate"
name: "Gate"
version: "1.0.0"
description: "Wraps setup-plan."
requires:
speckit_version: ">=1.0.0"
provides:
templates:
- type: "script"
name: "setup-plan"
file: "scripts/setup-plan.sh"
strategy: "wrap"
YAML
printf '#!/usr/bin/env bash\necho "BEFORE"\n$CORE_SCRIPT "$@"\n' > /tmp/p/scripts/setup-plan.sh
specify preset add --dev /tmp/p
# 4. Re-scaffold and compare
specify init . --integration claude --script sh --force
sha256sum .specify/scripts/bash/setup-plan.sh
Expected Behavior
.specify/scripts/bash/setup-plan.sh is composed from the stack, so the wrapper runs first and
delegates to the core script through $CORE_SCRIPT — matching the documented behaviour that
"templates and scripts are looked up from the stack when Spec Kit needs them".
Actual Behavior
The hash in step 4 is identical to step 2 and still matches
.specify/integrations/speckit.manifest.json. The override file and the preset-provided script are
never read. specify preset add reports success and specify preset list shows the preset as
enabled, so there is no signal that the declared script is inert.
Tried additionally, all without effect: strategy: replace as well as wrap,
specify integration upgrade, specify init --here --force. Same result on 1.0.1.
Specify CLI Version
1.0.6
AI Agent
Claude Code
Operating System
macOS 26.6.2
Python Version
Python 3.11.15
Error Logs
# There is no error output — that is part of the problem.
# A preset declaring a script installs cleanly and is reported as active:
$ specify preset add --dev /tmp/p
Installing preset from /tmp/p...
✓ Preset 'Gate' v1.0.0 installed (priority 10)
$ specify preset list
Installed Presets (in resolution order — highest precedence first)
Gate (gate) v1.0.0 — enabled — priority 10
Wraps setup-plan.
Templates: 1
# …while the script it provides is never resolved or executed.
Additional Context
Why this matters. The documented mechanism is the natural way to add a step in front of a core
script: the preset wraps setup-plan.sh, the core script stays untouched underneath, and Spec Kit
maintains the relationship. Any preset that needs to run a check, a fetch, or a validation before
the command body reads its inputs wants exactly this.
Current workaround, for anyone hitting the same wall. Override the command instead of the
script. A preset providing speckit.plan with strategy: "wrap" and a five-line body:
---
scripts:
sh: scripts/bash/setup-plan-wrapper.sh --json
---
{CORE_TEMPLATE}
points the materialised command at a project-owned script, which ends with
exec "$ROOT/.specify/scripts/bash/setup-plan.sh" "$@". This works and survives upgrades, because
{CORE_TEMPLATE} keeps pulling the command body from core.
It has two costs that the documented mechanism would remove:
- two artefacts instead of one. The script cannot travel inside the preset, so it lives beside
it as a separate committed file, and it needs a distinct filename because it cannot replace
setup-plan.sh. - nothing validates the link. A preset whose frontmatter names a script that does not exist
installs without any warning and is listed as healthy; the dead path only surfaces when a user
runs the command.
Suggestion. Either wire a caller fortemplate_type="script"and add.shresolution to
common.shand its Python twin, or — if scripts are not meant to be resolvable yet — adjust
docs/reference/presets.mdand havepreset.ymlvalidation rejecttype: scriptso the
declaration fails loudly instead of silently.
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 138k
- フォーク
- 12.4k
- 平均マージ
- 3日 6時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 145
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
github/spec-kit のほかの issue
-
enhancement needs-triage
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
-
enhancement needs-triage
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 74/100
-
enhancement needs-triage
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 84/100
-
enhancement needs-triage triage-can-wait
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 76/100
github/spec-kit の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
enhancement
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 70/100
canonical/paas-charm#368 · コメント 1 件 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 75/100
-
tech debt
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 75/100
-
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 90/100
StevenBlack/hosts#3256 ·
-
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 90/100
qualcomm/qai-appbuilder#275 ·