Maybe flatten out exception tree
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
調査の方向性
まず、現在の例外階層と、提案されている exceptions.general、exceptions.http、exceptions.opening、exceptions.kv_store、exceptions.acl モジュールを確認します。次に、ジェネレーターとその衝突処理を調べます。階層と名前について合意し、意図しない親子関係の変更なしにフラット化を実装し、衝突に対する保護を追加できれば完了です。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
This is a ticket for discussion and design, responding to Paul's comment about nested exceptions being awkward to reach for.
--
I spread all the errors out on the table and had a look. We can get a pretty nice result by dividing exceptions across 5 modules, while still saving ourselves from utterly changing the shape of the world (fighting the WIT forevermore). No more subpackages under exceptions, just 5 files:
-
exceptions.general:- All from types.error. I don't see a point in having a common superclass for these at all; there's no semantic, and it doesn't really help catchers narrow down what threw it, as many things throw these.
- Move
HttpInvalid,HttpUser, andHttpIncompletetoexceptions.http, though. - It's unfortunate
GenericErrorexists, as it sound a lot likeUnexpectedFastlyError.UnexpectedFastlyErrorshould become private, as it indicates a bug in our code if it's thrown. People definitely shouldn't be catching it. CatchExceptionorFastlyExceptionif you want a catch-all. - Rename
GenericErrortoOtherErrorto get a little closer to its meaning. "Generic" suggests to me a superset of the other errors, while "Other" unambiguously indicates it's not one of those errors.
-
exceptions.http:ErrorWithDetailwith a better name, likeHttpError.- All the
send-error-detailexceptionserror-with-detailcarries (not currently generated). Map anyErrorWithDetailthat has (optional) details directly onto these, subclassingHttpError. - All the
trailer-errors. RenameErrortoOtherError.
-
exceptions.opening:- All
open-errorerrors. This is actually a pretty semantically cohesive category.
- All
-
exceptions.kv_store:- All
kv-errorerrors. - There's another
GenericErrorthere. Rename it toOtherError.
- All
-
exceptions.acl:- All the
acl-errors. RenameGenericErrortoOtherError.
- All the
Open questions
- Are we going to cause trouble for ourselves by changing the parentage of some errors, like making
error'sHttpInvalidsuperclassexceptions.http.HttpError(or perhaps some other common ancestor)? I rather think so. The common-ancestor approach sounds good. Theerrorsuperclass is worthless, but theerror-with-detailone may have meaning.
Name collisions (if we were to flatten everything into 1 module):
- Error (x2), but we can probably remove the types.error.Error common superclass to make that go away.
- GenericError (x4)
- LimitExceeded (x2)
- TooManyRequests (x2)
- Unsupported (x2)
Paths not taken
We could deduplicate and have, say, ACL stuff and non-ACL stuff throw the same TooManyRequests error, but we'd be losing potentially important info for the catcher. So that's a bad idea. (Also, it could get messy if the 2 TooManyRequests errors later diverge in shape, which might happen if WIT grows subtyping.)
Thus, we must rename exceptions or divide up into modules.
If we flatten and rename, we get into trouble in the future when somebody introduces another InternalError and we never prefixed the KV one into KvStoreInternalError. I'm against preemptively prefixing the heck out of everything, because it gets wordy and this isn't Java. And does one really need to say HttpTrailerError? There are unlikely to be other kinds of trailer errors. But if we don't prefix universally, it becomes awkward to program against because you constantly have to look aside to see what we named things. So let's keep the names short and just make a better __repr__ instead if needed to clarify tracebacks.
Prerequisites
We'd need to add alarm bells about collisions in the generator so we don't accidentally template duplicate names into one module.
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 5
- フォーク
- 1
- PR マージ指標
- 30日以内にマージされた PR はありません
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
fastly/compute-sdk-python のほかの issue
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 75/100
fastly/compute-sdk-python#116 ·
-
難易度 4/5 3〜5日 初心者へのやさしさ 35/100
fastly/compute-sdk-python#98 ·
-
難易度 5/5 1週間以上 初心者へのやさしさ 35/100
fastly/compute-sdk-python#74 ·
-
難易度 5/5 1週間以上 初心者へのやさしさ 35/100
fastly/compute-sdk-python#61 ·
-
fastly/compute-sdk-python#60 · 担当者 1 名 ·
fastly/compute-sdk-python の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
enhancement
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 70/100
canonical/paas-charm#368 · コメント 1 件 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 75/100
-
tech debt
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 75/100
-
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 90/100
StevenBlack/hosts#3256 ·
-
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 90/100
qualcomm/qai-appbuilder#275 ·