Maybe flatten out exception tree
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 25/100
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia esaminando la gerarchia attuale delle eccezioni e i moduli proposti exceptions.general, exceptions.http, exceptions.opening, exceptions.kv_store e exceptions.acl. Poi esamina il generatore e la sua gestione delle collisioni. Il lavoro è completato quando la gerarchia e i nomi sono stati concordati, l’appiattimento è stato implementato senza modifiche involontarie alle relazioni di ereditarietà e sono state aggiunte protezioni contro le collisioni.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
This is a ticket for discussion and design, responding to Paul's comment about nested exceptions being awkward to reach for.
--
I spread all the errors out on the table and had a look. We can get a pretty nice result by dividing exceptions across 5 modules, while still saving ourselves from utterly changing the shape of the world (fighting the WIT forevermore). No more subpackages under exceptions, just 5 files:
-
exceptions.general:- All from types.error. I don't see a point in having a common superclass for these at all; there's no semantic, and it doesn't really help catchers narrow down what threw it, as many things throw these.
- Move
HttpInvalid,HttpUser, andHttpIncompletetoexceptions.http, though. - It's unfortunate
GenericErrorexists, as it sound a lot likeUnexpectedFastlyError.UnexpectedFastlyErrorshould become private, as it indicates a bug in our code if it's thrown. People definitely shouldn't be catching it. CatchExceptionorFastlyExceptionif you want a catch-all. - Rename
GenericErrortoOtherErrorto get a little closer to its meaning. "Generic" suggests to me a superset of the other errors, while "Other" unambiguously indicates it's not one of those errors.
-
exceptions.http:ErrorWithDetailwith a better name, likeHttpError.- All the
send-error-detailexceptionserror-with-detailcarries (not currently generated). Map anyErrorWithDetailthat has (optional) details directly onto these, subclassingHttpError. - All the
trailer-errors. RenameErrortoOtherError.
-
exceptions.opening:- All
open-errorerrors. This is actually a pretty semantically cohesive category.
- All
-
exceptions.kv_store:- All
kv-errorerrors. - There's another
GenericErrorthere. Rename it toOtherError.
- All
-
exceptions.acl:- All the
acl-errors. RenameGenericErrortoOtherError.
- All the
Open questions
- Are we going to cause trouble for ourselves by changing the parentage of some errors, like making
error'sHttpInvalidsuperclassexceptions.http.HttpError(or perhaps some other common ancestor)? I rather think so. The common-ancestor approach sounds good. Theerrorsuperclass is worthless, but theerror-with-detailone may have meaning.
Name collisions (if we were to flatten everything into 1 module):
- Error (x2), but we can probably remove the types.error.Error common superclass to make that go away.
- GenericError (x4)
- LimitExceeded (x2)
- TooManyRequests (x2)
- Unsupported (x2)
Paths not taken
We could deduplicate and have, say, ACL stuff and non-ACL stuff throw the same TooManyRequests error, but we'd be losing potentially important info for the catcher. So that's a bad idea. (Also, it could get messy if the 2 TooManyRequests errors later diverge in shape, which might happen if WIT grows subtyping.)
Thus, we must rename exceptions or divide up into modules.
If we flatten and rename, we get into trouble in the future when somebody introduces another InternalError and we never prefixed the KV one into KvStoreInternalError. I'm against preemptively prefixing the heck out of everything, because it gets wordy and this isn't Java. And does one really need to say HttpTrailerError? There are unlikely to be other kinds of trailer errors. But if we don't prefix universally, it becomes awkward to program against because you constantly have to look aside to see what we named things. So let's keep the names short and just make a better __repr__ instead if needed to clarify tracebacks.
Prerequisites
We'd need to add alarm bells about collisions in the generator so we don't accidentally template duplicate names into one module.
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 5
- Fork
- 1
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di fastly/compute-sdk-python
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
fastly/compute-sdk-python#116 ·
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 35/100
fastly/compute-sdk-python#98 ·
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 35/100
fastly/compute-sdk-python#74 ·
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 35/100
fastly/compute-sdk-python#61 ·
-
fastly/compute-sdk-python#60 · 1 assegnatario ·
Tutte le issue di fastly/compute-sdk-python
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
anthropics/skills#1811 · 1 commento ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
speaches-ai/speaches#678 ·
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
datalayer/mcp-compose#42 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
conda-forge/spacy-feedstock#177 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals#2523 ·