Hacktoberfest 2026:メンテナが10月に向けて印を付けた、オープンで初心者向けの issue。 Hacktoberfest の issue を見る

Jobs: with keep_completed, success and error records outlive the rows they describe

オープン
#1,577 コメント 0 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
3/5
見積もり時間
半日
初心者へのやさしさ
65/100
issue の種類
バグ
明瞭さ
明確に書かれている
活発さ
活発
技術スタック
mysql, python

調査の方向性

Start from Job.refresh(), specifically step 3, which removes stale job records only when they are older than stale_timeout and their keys are missing from key_source. Run the reproduction in the issue to see that success rows for deleted keys survive refresh(stale_timeout=0). Done means those orphaned success and error rows are removed without waiting for the timeout, while pending rows keep the age check. The issue also offers an alternative change to the meaning of stale_timeout=0, so check with maintainers which one they want.

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

Summary

With config.jobs.keep_completed = True, a table's jobs table keeps a success record for every computed key. When upstream rows are deleted and the cascade removes the computed rows, their success records stay. jobs.refresh() does not remove them until they are older than stale_timeout (3600 s by default). Passing stale_timeout=0 skips the cleanup entirely instead of forcing it. For up to an hour, then, status counts read from the jobs table overstate what the table holds. Records with status='error' for keys that no longer exist behave the same way.

Reproduction

DataJoint 2.3.5.dev2 (master), MySQL 8.0:

import datajoint as dj

dj.config.jobs.keep_completed = True
schema = dj.Schema("scratch_jobs")

@schema
class Raw(dj.Manual):
    definition = """
    raw_id : int32
    ---
    v : float32
    """

@schema
class Proc(dj.Computed):
    definition = """
    -> Raw
    ---
    w : float32
    """

    def make(self, key):
        self.insert1(dict(key, w=2 * (Raw & key).fetch1("v")))

def counts():
    j = Proc.jobs
    return {s: len(j & f"status='{s}'") for s in ("pending", "reserved", "success", "error")}

Raw.insert([dict(raw_id=i, v=float(i)) for i in range(3)])
Proc.populate(reserve_jobs=True)
print("after populate:", "rows", len(Proc()), "jobs", counts())
(Raw & "raw_id = 0").delete(prompt=False)
print("after deleting raw_id=0:", "rows", len(Proc()), "key_source", len(Proc.key_source), "jobs", counts())
print("refresh:", Proc.jobs.refresh())
print("refresh(stale_timeout=0):", Proc.jobs.refresh(stale_timeout=0), "jobs", counts())

Output:

after populate: rows 3 jobs {'pending': 0, 'reserved': 0, 'success': 3, 'error': 0}
after deleting raw_id=0: rows 2 key_source 2 jobs {'pending': 0, 'reserved': 0, 'success': 3, 'error': 0}
refresh: {'added': 0, 'removed': 0, 'orphaned': 0, 're_pended': 0}
refresh(stale_timeout=0): {'added': 0, 'removed': 0, 'orphaned': 0, 're_pended': 0} jobs {'pending': 0, 'reserved': 0, 'success': 3, 'error': 0}

Two rows exist and three successes are recorded. After a larger delete (removing a parameter set, say), anything that reports progress from the jobs table shows completed work that no longer exists, for an hour.

Where it comes from

Job.refresh() step 3 removes only records older than stale_timeout whose keys are no longer in key_source. The age condition makes sense for pending records, which can race a key_source that is still being filled, and the setting's description says so: "Seconds before pending job is checked for staleness". It is applied to every status except ignore, though, including success and error. And stale_timeout=0 means "skip this step", so there is no way to request the cleanup now.

Proposal

In refresh(), remove success and error records whose keys are in neither key_source nor the target, regardless of age. Keep the age condition for pending, which it was written for. Neither kind of record describes anything that exists, and neither is retried. Alternatively, make stale_timeout=0 mean "no grace period" rather than "skip", and give the skip its own value (None).

主要言語
Python
スター
197
フォーク
98
平均マージ
15時間 31分
マージ済み PR(30日)
9

環境構築

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

datajoint/datajoint-python のほかの issue

datajoint/datajoint-python の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

Python の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。