Hacktoberfest 2026：メンテナが10月に向けて印を付けた、オープンで初心者向けの issue。 Hacktoberfest の issue を見る

feature_request(ignoring): ignoring words based on their context

オープン
  • 何か問題がありますか？
#3,679 コメント 1 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
5/5
見積もり時間
1週間以上
初心者へのやさしさ
25/100
issue の種類
機能追加
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
活発さ
停滞
技術スタック
python
領域
tooling

調査の方向性

Start by reviewing the related issues (#410, #2491, and #3673), then inspect how Codespell currently handles configuration and ignored words. Done means users can configure words to be ignored only for specified contexts and file extensions, while still receiving warnings in other cases; the issue gives four example cases to check.

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

Related issues: #410, #2491, #3673.

1. Summary

It would be nice if Codespell will allow ignoring words based on their context.

2. Justification of the need of the feature

This was discussed in several issues of this repository. It would be nice to have behavior where Codespell ignore words solely in specific cases but continues to return warnings for all another cases.

3. Example of desired behavior

Example YAML configuration file with keys context and extensions. Examples in this file are false positives from my project.

# [OVERVIEW] Example of a Codespell configuration file for ignoring words based on their context:
#
#
# [KEYS] Both keys are optional, but at least one of them must exists.
#
# 1. “context” — the list of contexts in which the word is ignored. List items are case-sensitive.
# If the key doesn’t exist, Codespell will ignore the word in any context.
#
# 2. “extensions” — the list of extensions for which the word is ignored.
# If the key doesn’t exist, Codespell will ignore the word for any extension.


#############
# Example 1 #
#############
# [PURPOSE] I want to get Codespell warnings for the “colour” word
# except the case where this word is used in the phrase “Colour Contrast Checker”.
#
# [INFO] “Colour Contrast Checker” is the name of the online application:
# https://github.com/Pushedskydiver/Colour-Contrast-Checker
colour:
  context:
  - Colour Contrast Checker


#############
# Example 2 #
#############
# [PURPOSE] I want to get Codespell warnings for the “isnt” typo,
# but not for the CoffeeScript built-in operator “isnt”:
# https://coffeescript.org/#operators
isnt:
  extensions:
  - coffee


#############
# Example 3 #
#############
# [PURPOSE] I want to get Codespell warnings for the “nd” typo,
# but not for the class “.nd” from the Pygments library in my CSS and Stylus files:
#
# [NOTE] I preferred more informative class names than “.nd”, but Pygments developers have the another opinion:
# https://github.com/richleland/pygments-css/blob/146834e1f9476d517c10cee5f15381047866d93d/monokai.css#L34
nd:
  context:
  - .nd
  extensions:
  - css
  - styl


#############
# Example 4 #
#############
# [PURPOSE] I want to get Codespell warnings for the “whos” typo,
# but not for the IPython built-in magic command “%whos”:
# https://ipython.readthedocs.io/en/stable/interactive/magics.html#magic-whos
whos:
  context:
  - "%whos"
  extensions:
  - py

If this file exists, Codespell will ignore colour, isnt, nd and whos for contexts provided in the file.

It would be nice if Codespell will support something like this configuration file.

4. Alternatives of context+extension ignoring
4.1. Inline ignoring

I’m not sure that codespell:ignore comments is the best solution for users.

  1. If a user gets the same false positive multiple times, he needs to add codespell:ignore comments multiple times. If a configuration file as in my example would be allowed, it would be enough for a user to make one record in a configuration.
  2. I try not to use inline ignoring at all and prefer ignoring via the configuration if it’s possible. In my opinion, it would be nice if text files contains solely texts and code files contains solely code without records especially for checkers/linters/validators.
  3. Unfortunately, currently Codespell by default doesn’t provide an opportunity ignoring words based on their context. But I hope that someday it will become possible, and users can make pull requests based on their personal configurations for cases like %whos from my example.
4.2. Per-file ignoring

In my opinion, it would be nice, that the pull request #3675 allows ignoring based on extensions, but I’m not sure that ignoring per file is the best idea. The file may contain both false positives and real typos, and if a user activate the option --per-file-ignores, he may skip real typos. The context key from my example would allow more accurate ignoring.

Thanks.

主要言語
Python
スター
2.4k
フォーク
531
平均マージ
15時間 5分
マージ済み PR（30日）
18

環境構築

Codespaces で開く

このプロジェクトの開発コンテナを、あなたの GitHub アカウントでブラウザ上に起動します。

  • Dockerfile・Docker Compose ファイルなし
  • プルリクエストのテンプレートなし
  • コントリビューションガイドなし

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

codespell-project/codespell のほかの issue

codespell-project/codespell の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

Python の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。