feature_request(ignoring): ignoring words based on their context
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100
Línea de trabajo
Start by reviewing the related issues (#410, #2491, and #3673), then inspect how Codespell currently handles configuration and ignored words. Done means users can configure words to be ignored only for specified contexts and file extensions, while still receiving warnings in other cases; the issue gives four example cases to check.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Related issues: #410, #2491, #3673.
1. Summary
It would be nice if Codespell will allow ignoring words based on their context.
2. Justification of the need of the feature
This was discussed in several issues of this repository. It would be nice to have behavior where Codespell ignore words solely in specific cases but continues to return warnings for all another cases.
3. Example of desired behavior
Example YAML configuration file with keys context and extensions. Examples in this file are false positives from my project.
# [OVERVIEW] Example of a Codespell configuration file for ignoring words based on their context:
#
#
# [KEYS] Both keys are optional, but at least one of them must exists.
#
# 1. “context” — the list of contexts in which the word is ignored. List items are case-sensitive.
# If the key doesn’t exist, Codespell will ignore the word in any context.
#
# 2. “extensions” — the list of extensions for which the word is ignored.
# If the key doesn’t exist, Codespell will ignore the word for any extension.
#############
# Example 1 #
#############
# [PURPOSE] I want to get Codespell warnings for the “colour” word
# except the case where this word is used in the phrase “Colour Contrast Checker”.
#
# [INFO] “Colour Contrast Checker” is the name of the online application:
# https://github.com/Pushedskydiver/Colour-Contrast-Checker
colour:
context:
- Colour Contrast Checker
#############
# Example 2 #
#############
# [PURPOSE] I want to get Codespell warnings for the “isnt” typo,
# but not for the CoffeeScript built-in operator “isnt”:
# https://coffeescript.org/#operators
isnt:
extensions:
- coffee
#############
# Example 3 #
#############
# [PURPOSE] I want to get Codespell warnings for the “nd” typo,
# but not for the class “.nd” from the Pygments library in my CSS and Stylus files:
#
# [NOTE] I preferred more informative class names than “.nd”, but Pygments developers have the another opinion:
# https://github.com/richleland/pygments-css/blob/146834e1f9476d517c10cee5f15381047866d93d/monokai.css#L34
nd:
context:
- .nd
extensions:
- css
- styl
#############
# Example 4 #
#############
# [PURPOSE] I want to get Codespell warnings for the “whos” typo,
# but not for the IPython built-in magic command “%whos”:
# https://ipython.readthedocs.io/en/stable/interactive/magics.html#magic-whos
whos:
context:
- "%whos"
extensions:
- py
If this file exists, Codespell will ignore colour, isnt, nd and whos for contexts provided in the file.
It would be nice if Codespell will support something like this configuration file.
4. Alternatives of context+extension ignoring
4.1. Inline ignoring
I’m not sure that codespell:ignore comments is the best solution for users.
- If a user gets the same false positive multiple times, he needs to add
codespell:ignorecomments multiple times. If a configuration file as in my example would be allowed, it would be enough for a user to make one record in a configuration. - I try not to use inline ignoring at all and prefer ignoring via the configuration if it’s possible. In my opinion, it would be nice if text files contains solely texts and code files contains solely code without records especially for checkers/linters/validators.
- Unfortunately, currently Codespell by default doesn’t provide an opportunity ignoring words based on their context. But I hope that someday it will become possible, and users can make pull requests based on their personal configurations for cases like
%whosfrom my example.
4.2. Per-file ignoring
In my opinion, it would be nice, that the pull request #3675 allows ignoring based on extensions, but I’m not sure that ignoring per file is the best idea. The file may contain both false positives and real typos, and if a user activate the option --per-file-ignores, he may skip real typos. The context key from my example would allow more accurate ignoring.
Thanks.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 2.4k
- Forks
- 531
- Merge medio
- 15 h 55 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 17
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Sin guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de codespell-project/codespell
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
codespell-project/codespell#3997 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
No error when beginning with 'Abiertoenhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 63/100
codespell-project/codespell#3965 · 3 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Add "marcos"Posiblemente ocupada @ekanshul la tomó hace 20 días. Abiertodictionary
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
codespell-project/codespell#3920 · 3 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
question
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 55/100
codespell-project/codespell#4005 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
duplicate question
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
codespell-project/codespell#3998 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de codespell-project/codespell
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
-
Validate finite output clamping limits in StepPredictor.prepare_clamping_params to prevent silent NaN/Inf propagationPosiblemente ocupada @muskan-creates352 la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
mllam/neural-lam#848 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
infra
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
fab-geocommuns/RNB-coeur#1166 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
deepspeedai/DeepSpeed#8951 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
aws/context-ontology-accelerator#343 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día