Hacktoberfest 2026:メンテナが10月に向けて印を付けた、オープンで初心者向けの issue。 Hacktoberfest の issue を見る

Test audit: remove low-value tests, repair tests that cannot fail, adopt a test authoring gate

クローズ
#168 コメント 0 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
5/5
見積もり時間
1週間以上
初心者へのやさしさ
35/100
issue の種類
リファクタリング
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
活発さ
活発
技術スタック
typescript

調査の方向性

Start by reading the complete evidence for audit batches L1, L2, and G5, then inspect the repository's agent instructions and the affected tests on the unedited base. Re-run each affected test and keeper test before changes, and use mutation proofs for repairs or consolidations. Done means the batches are merged or explicitly declined, the authoring gate is adopted, and comparable BEFORE/AFTER measurements are posted.

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

Summary

A test audit of this repository (method: the openclaw test-audit skill: authoring gate, junk-pattern list, retention bar, full evidence per candidate) found 3 candidates with complete evidence: tests that duplicate a stronger owner test, tests that cannot fail, and test-only production seams. This issue tracks applying them as small atomic PRs, one per owner boundary, plus adopting a test authoring gate in this repository's agent instructions.

Every PR re-runs the affected tests and their keeper tests on the unedited base first. A retained test that fails on the base is treated as a product bug and fixed at its owner, never deleted. Every consolidation or repair carries a mutation proof (a deliberate break of the production owner turns the keeper red, then the owner is restored byte for byte).

Expected (ideal state)

Property Why
Every test protects observable behavior, a credible regression, or an independently meaningful contract Confidence, not deletion count
Every junk test with complete evidence is deleted, consolidated into its named keeper, or repaired so it can fail Low-value tests cost CI time and mislead reviewers
Test-only production seams unlocked by those deletions are removed Production code whose only callers are tests is dead weight
Assertions that can never fail are repaired, each proven by a mutation that turns it red A test that cannot fail proves nothing
Valuable tests that run in no CI job are routed into CI Coverage that never runs is not coverage
The repository's agent test rules carry the authoring gate, junk-pattern list and retention bar, with conflicting older rules reconciled New junk stops arriving
Test/support/production line counts and CI time are measured before and after with the same tool The effect is stated in numbers

Acceptance criteria

  • Every audit batch for this repository merged or explicitly declined with a reason (planned batches: L1, L2, G5)
  • The test authoring gate adopted in this repository's agent instructions
  • BEFORE/AFTER numbers (test files, test/support/production lines, CI job times or a stated "not comparable") posted here
主要言語
TypeScript
スター
3.8k
フォーク
246
PR マージ指標
30日以内にマージされた PR はありません

環境構築

このプロジェクトには開発コンテナ、Dockerfile、コントリビューションガイドがありません。まず README を読み、一般的な手順ははじめてのコントリビューションガイドを参照してください。

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

code-yeongyu/lazycodex のほかの issue

code-yeongyu/lazycodex の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

TypeScript の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。