Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

Test audit: remove low-value tests, repair tests that cannot fail, adopt a test authoring gate

Cerrado
  • ¿Algo no está bien?
#168 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Aptitud para principiantes
35/100
Tipo de issue
Refactorización
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
typescript
Área
testing-qa, tooling

Línea de trabajo

Start by reading the complete evidence for audit batches L1, L2, and G5, then inspect the repository's agent instructions and the affected tests on the unedited base. Re-run each affected test and keeper test before changes, and use mutation proofs for repairs or consolidations. Done means the batches are merged or explicitly declined, the authoring gate is adopted, and comparable BEFORE/AFTER measurements are posted.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

Summary

A test audit of this repository (method: the openclaw test-audit skill: authoring gate, junk-pattern list, retention bar, full evidence per candidate) found 3 candidates with complete evidence: tests that duplicate a stronger owner test, tests that cannot fail, and test-only production seams. This issue tracks applying them as small atomic PRs, one per owner boundary, plus adopting a test authoring gate in this repository's agent instructions.

Every PR re-runs the affected tests and their keeper tests on the unedited base first. A retained test that fails on the base is treated as a product bug and fixed at its owner, never deleted. Every consolidation or repair carries a mutation proof (a deliberate break of the production owner turns the keeper red, then the owner is restored byte for byte).

Expected (ideal state)

Property Why
Every test protects observable behavior, a credible regression, or an independently meaningful contract Confidence, not deletion count
Every junk test with complete evidence is deleted, consolidated into its named keeper, or repaired so it can fail Low-value tests cost CI time and mislead reviewers
Test-only production seams unlocked by those deletions are removed Production code whose only callers are tests is dead weight
Assertions that can never fail are repaired, each proven by a mutation that turns it red A test that cannot fail proves nothing
Valuable tests that run in no CI job are routed into CI Coverage that never runs is not coverage
The repository's agent test rules carry the authoring gate, junk-pattern list and retention bar, with conflicting older rules reconciled New junk stops arriving
Test/support/production line counts and CI time are measured before and after with the same tool The effect is stated in numbers

Acceptance criteria

  • Every audit batch for this repository merged or explicitly declined with a reason (planned batches: L1, L2, G5)
  • The test authoring gate adopted in this repository's agent instructions
  • BEFORE/AFTER numbers (test files, test/support/production lines, CI job times or a stated "not comparable") posted here
Lenguaje dominante
TypeScript
Estrellas
3.8k
Forks
246
Sin PR fusionados en 30 d

Preparar el entorno

Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de code-yeongyu/lazycodex

Todos los issues de code-yeongyu/lazycodex

Issues similares

Más issues de TypeScript

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.