Hacktoberfest 2026:メンテナが10月に向けて印を付けた、オープンで初心者向けの issue。 Hacktoberfest の issue を見る

[Bug]: get() on a SKIPPED parallel branch never returns, and the execution fails

オープン
#752 コメント 0 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
4/5
見積もり時間
3〜5日
初心者へのやさしさ
52/100
issue の種類
バグ
明瞭さ
明確に書かれている
活発さ
活発
技術スタック
java

調査の方向性

Start with ParallelOperation.handleCompletion and ParallelOperation.branch(), then inspect ChildContextOperation.handleChildContextSuccess and the sdk-integration-tests using LocalDurableTestRunner. Compare both skipped-branch cases across the first invocation and replay, and update docs/core/parallel.md as needed. Done means get() consistently returns or throws a named branch exception without producing PENDING with no pending operation.

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

bug pkg:sdk
Expected Behavior

get() on a branch future returns the branch result or throws an exception. It behaves the same way in the first invocation and on every replay.

The parallel result can record a branch as SKIPPED. For such a branch, get() should throw an exception that names the branch. docs/core/parallel.md should document it. For comparison, docs/core/map.md defines a skipped map item: status SKIPPED, a null result, and a null error.

Actual Behavior

get() on a SKIPPED branch does not return, and it does not throw a branch exception. It waits until the SDK suspends the invocation. The invocation then returns PENDING with no pending operation. In the cloud, the service rejects that output with InvalidParameterValueException: Cannot return PENDING status with no pending operations., the same error as in #736. Every replay reaches the same state, so the execution fails.

This happens in two cases.

Case 1: the branch never started.

  1. A completion config such as firstSuccessful() completes the parallel before every branch has started.
  2. ParallelOperation.handleCompletion records each branch whose future is not complete as SKIPPED.
  3. The SDK does not start that branch later. Nothing completes its future until the SDK suspends the invocation.
  4. get() on the branch releases the calling thread and waits. If no other thread is active, the SDK suspends the invocation. The suspension ends the wait with the SDK's internal SuspendExecutionException.
  5. On replay, ParallelOperation.branch() reads SKIPPED from the checkpointed result and does not queue the branch. So every replay repeats steps 3 and 4.

Case 1 needs no race, and it fails in the first invocation. The repro uses firstSuccessful(). handleCompletion applies the same rule for every completion config that can complete early: minSuccessful(n), allSuccessful(), toleratedFailureCount(n), and shouldComplete(...).

Case 2: the branch was still running when the parallel completed.

  1. With unlimited concurrency, branch-b can still be running when branch-a completes the parallel. The checkpointed result records branch-b as SKIPPED.
  2. branch-b finishes later in the same invocation. ChildContextOperation.handleChildContextSuccess does not checkpoint the result, because the parallel is already complete. get() returns the result from memory.
  3. A later operation, such as a wait, suspends the invocation. The next invocation replays the handler.
  4. On replay, ParallelOperation.branch() reads SKIPPED and does not run branch-b. The get() call that returned a value in the first invocation now waits until the SDK suspends, as in case 1.

In case 2, the same handler code returns a value in the first invocation and fails on replay.

Steps to Reproduce

Both cases run in sdk-integration-tests with LocalDurableTestRunner.

Case 1 is the basic pattern from docs/core/parallel.md with firstSuccessful():

var runner = LocalDurableTestRunner.create(String.class, (input, context) -> {
    var config = ParallelConfig.builder()
            .maxConcurrency(1)
            .completionConfig(CompletionConfig.firstSuccessful())
            .build();
    var parallel = context.parallel("first-successful", config);
    var a = parallel.branch("branch-a", String.class, ctx -> "A");
    var b = parallel.branch("branch-b", String.class, ctx -> "B");
    parallel.get(); // MIN_SUCCESSFUL_REACHED, statuses [SUCCEEDED, SKIPPED]
    a.get(); // "A"
    return b.get(); // never returns a value or throws a branch exception
});

var result = runner.runUntilComplete("input");
assertEquals(ExecutionStatus.PENDING, result.getStatus());

The result has status PENDING and no error. The execution state holds first-successful (Parallel, SUCCEEDED) and branch-a (ParallelBranch, SUCCEEDED). No operation is pending. The invocation logs Invalid suspension. No operation is pending. Each further runner.run("input") gives the same result. The outcome is the same with NestingType.FLAT, and with DurableFuture.allOf(...) over both branches in place of b.get().

Case 2 uses unlimited concurrency. A wait after the parallel forces a replay:

var runner = LocalDurableTestRunner.create(String.class, (input, context) -> {
    var config = ParallelConfig.builder()
            .completionConfig(CompletionConfig.firstSuccessful())
            .build();
    var parallel = context.parallel("first-successful", config);
    var a = parallel.branch("branch-a", String.class, ctx -> sleepThen(200, "A"));
    var b = parallel.branch("branch-b", String.class, ctx -> sleepThen(1000, "B"));
    parallel.get(); // statuses [SUCCEEDED, SKIPPED]: branch-b is still running
    var value = a.get() + b.get(); // "AB" in the first invocation
    context.wait("pause", Duration.ofSeconds(1)); // any later suspension causes a replay
    return value;
});

runner.run("input"); // invocation 1
runner.advanceTime(); // completes "pause"
runner.run("input"); // invocation 2, a replay

sleepThen(ms, value) calls Thread.sleep(ms) and returns value.

Invocation a.get() + b.get() Output Pending operations
1 returns "AB" PENDING 1 (pause)
2 does not return PENDING, no error 0
3 and 4 does not return PENDING, no error 0

Invocations 2 to 4 each log Invalid suspension. No operation is pending. The outcome is the same with NestingType.FLAT.

SDK Version

2.2.1. Reproduced on main at ef88276 (2.2.2-SNAPSHOT). No file under sdk/src/main changed between v2.2.1 and ef88276.

Java Version

21

Is this a regression?

Unknown

Additional Context
  • #736 listed this as a follow-up: "Make get() on a persisted skipped branch fail explicitly instead of waiting forever." #737 fixed the race in #736 and did not change this behavior. #736 described the replay of a persisted result. Case 1 also fails in the first invocation.
  • A fix for case 2 has to make the first invocation and the replay agree. One option: get() throws for every branch that the checkpointed result records as SKIPPED, including a branch that finished later in the first invocation. Another option: the SDK checkpoints a late branch result so that replay returns it.
  • The ParallelResult table in docs/core/parallel.md does not list skipped() or statuses().
  • The end state, PENDING with no pending operation, is the state that #370 and #736 also reached. How the SDK reports that state is a separate issue.
主要言語
Java
スター
28
フォーク
13
平均マージ
2日 3時間
マージ済み PR(30日)
44

環境構築

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

aws/aws-durable-execution-sdk-java のほかの issue

aws/aws-durable-execution-sdk-java の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

Java の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。