Hacktoberfest 2026:メンテナが10月に向けて印を付けた、オープンで初心者向けの issue。 Hacktoberfest の issue を見る

fix(telemetry): isolate unreadable sources during ingestion and reporting

オープン
#1,070 コメント 0 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
5/5
見積もり時間
1週間以上
初心者へのやさしさ
35/100
issue の種類
バグ
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
活発さ
活発
技術スタック
node.js, typescript

調査の方向性

Start with cli/src/contexts/telemetry/application/ingest-usage-use-case.ts and trace how reader failures stop storage; then read the read, transcript, report, and catch-up files named in the issue. Use cli/tests/helpers/ports/in-memory-telemetry.ts to understand the reproduction and regression tests. Done means healthy consented records survive a source failure, the stored ledger remains reportable with a clear partial-error indication, and failed positions can be retried without losing or duplicating calls.

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

Objective / Problem

A reader error aborts ingestion for every tool. A valid, consenting call from the healthy reader is not stored, and report cannot read the existing ledger because it first awaits ingestion.

Reproduction and observed behavior

Reproduced on next commit da3a99c5903f911df5e4e6201d946a28c7937efd, using the real normalizer/read/resolve/ingest use cases and the existing in-memory telemetry test ports. No provider or personal transcript is needed.

  1. Seed one valid Claude usage line and its consenting clone, using InMemoryTranscripts, FakeLocator, FakeConsents and InMemoryConsentHistory from cli/tests/helpers/ports/in-memory-telemetry.ts.
  2. Register that reader alongside a second reader whose execute() throws EACCES after the healthy read completes.
  3. Execute IngestUsageUseCase; compare with the same setup using an empty but healthy second reader.
Case Healthy records Result Ledger writes Stored calls
Second reader fails 1 EACCES 0 0
Healthy control 1 success 1 1

The synthetic assertions passed. Actual source opening/traversal also propagates EACCES; the Codex source integration suite explicitly tests that rejection.

Expected behavior / Proposed solution

Isolate source failures so valid, consented records from healthy sources can still be stored and the existing ledger remains reportable. Identify the failed source explicitly, preserve its retry position and never represent failure as zero usage. Do not weaken global consent validation.

Keep hook catch-up non-blocking, while making the failure diagnosable through the CLI. Choose and document whether containment is per tool, transcript or unreadable subtree.

Technical context

  • cli/src/contexts/telemetry/application/ingest-usage-use-case.ts: the reader Promise.all rejects before storage.
  • cli/src/contexts/telemetry/application/read-usage-use-case.ts and infrastructure/transcripts/transcript-files.ts: unreadable files/subtrees propagate errors.
  • cli/src/contexts/telemetry/application/report/report-usage-use-case.ts: ingestion precedes reading the stored ledger.
  • plugins/aidd-telemetry/hooks/catch-up.cjs: catch-up output/status is suppressed.

Related: #689 established reader failure isolation in the previous architecture; this is a reproducible defect in the replacement pipeline. #297 and #707 cover the broader source investigation and runtime evidence. No native OTel integration is required to fix this defect.

Acceptance / QA

  • Readable Claude + failing Codex, and the reverse, preserve healthy consented records.
  • An unreadable file/subtree has an explicit diagnostic and a documented containment boundary.
  • Failed-source positions remain retryable; a later successful read neither loses nor duplicates calls.
  • The existing ledger remains reportable with an explicit partial/source-error indication.
  • Unknown counters, failed sources and genuine zero consumption remain distinct; consent still fails closed.
  • Regression tests prove the failing cases and healthy controls without personal data or a provider call.
主要言語
TypeScript
スター
481
フォーク
45
平均マージ
1日 5時間
マージ済み PR(30日)
81

環境構築

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

ai-driven-dev/framework のほかの issue

ai-driven-dev/framework の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

TypeScript の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。