Preserve the previous build output when writing its Cargo receipt fails
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 56/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- rust
- Ambito
- build-system, cli
Direzione di ricerca
Start at the binary activation and receipt writing sequence in tools/src/build.rs around line 119, then trace the existing package backup restoration work in #1001 and the build identity checks. Reproduce the receipt destination conflict described in the issue and inspect the build-cargo tests for activation and rollback coverage. Done means a failed receipt write preserves both previous outputs or reports a retained recovery location, with successful builds activating a matching pair.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Problem
The build-cargo helper replaces the requested output binary before writing its build.json receipt. If receipt serialization or activation fails, the helper returns an error after the previous output has already been lost. The two outputs can then describe different build generations.
Starting point: binary activation followed by receipt writing.
Reproduction
Audited canonical master e1f8effd195b6339c3979b1e091e63c25f1da983 on Linux amd64 with checkout-built Wave 0.0.1-alpha-dev, matching std, Rust 1.89.0, Cargo jobs=2 and LLVM 21.1.8. The master SHA was rechecked before registration.
Build the two tools from the audited checkout using the pinned toolchain and matching LLVM. The following Linux reproduction invokes real incremental Cargo, uses only disposable output paths, and makes the receipt destination a directory to force a deterministic activation error:
from pathlib import Path
import os
import subprocess
import tempfile
root = Path.cwd()
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory(prefix="wave-build-receipt-") as temporary:
output = Path(temporary) / "wavec"
output.write_bytes(b"PREVIOUS-COMPILER")
receipt = output.with_suffix(".build.json")
receipt.mkdir()
environment = os.environ.copy()
environment["LLVM_SYS_211_PREFIX"] = "/usr/lib64/llvm21"
result = subprocess.run([
str(root / "target/debug/wave-tools"), "build-cargo",
"--target", "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu",
"--binary", str(root / "target/debug/wavec"),
"--output", str(output), "--",
"cargo", "+1.89.0", "build", "--locked", "--jobs", "2",
"-p", "wavec", "--bin", "wavec",
], env=environment, capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=300)
print("exit:", result.returncode)
print(result.stderr.strip())
print("old bytes preserved:", output.read_bytes() == b"PREVIOUS-COMPILER")
print("output header:", output.read_bytes()[:4])
Observed:
exit: 1
wave-tools: Is a directory (os error 21)
old bytes preserved: False
output header: b'\x7fELF'
The Cargo compiler build itself succeeded. Despite the helper's failed result, the previous sentinel was replaced by the new compiler. A directory at the receipt path is one reproducible failure injection, not the only possible receipt I/O failure.
Scope
Treat binary and receipt activation as one recoverable build-output operation. Prepare and validate both destinations before replacement; any later failure must preserve or restore the prior output set, retaining a recoverable backup if restoration itself fails. Keep Cargo compilation and Meson orchestration unchanged.
Related: #1001 covered package-set backup restoration, while #1070 delivered Rust tooling. Neither covers this build-cargo binary/receipt activation order.
Completion criteria
- A receipt-write failure leaves the previous binary and receipt usable, or reports a retained recovery location if rollback cannot finish.
- A successful invocation activates a matching binary/receipt pair.
- Regressions cover a conflicting receipt destination and failures around activation and restoration.
- Native platform replacement semantics and existing package/build identity checks remain intact.
- Lingua principale
- Rust
- Stelle
- 56
- Fork
- 21
- Merge medio
- 20h 49m
- PR unite (30g)
- 45
Preparare l'ambiente
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di wavefnd/Wave
-
Reject unrepresentable POSIX listener descriptors before Unix-domain acceptForse già presa @ShahadatTest l’ha presa 2 giorni fa. Apertabug good first issue
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
wavefnd/Wave#1082 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug help wanted
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 35/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug help wanted
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 53/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug ci help wanted
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 48/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Prevent compiler stack overflow on long acyclic forward type-alias chainsForse già presa @hiyouwhatsapp l’ha presa 3 giorni fa. Apertabug
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 35/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di wavefnd/Wave
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
NSPG13/agent-bounties#1749 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
area: web bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
kinqsradio/orbyn-engineering#227 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
agentic-workflows automation repo-assist
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 85/100
shanselman/winget-tui#483 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
lightonai/next-plaid#205 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
apache/datafusion-iceberg#100 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno