ISO-2022 encoders accept U+001B (and `iso2022_kr` U+000E/U+000F) although the encoding cannot represent them
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 3/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-2 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 57/100
Direzione di ricerca
Start with the ASCII fast path in Modules/cjkcodecs/_codecs_iso2022.c around lines 190–200, then review the Hypothesis regression in pull request #160155, where RoundTripBugs.test_iso2022_escape is marked as an expected failure. Check the affected ISO-2022 encoders, including the SO/SI cases for iso2022_kr, and confirm the regression and error-handler tests pass when these unrepresentable control characters are rejected.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Bug description
In ISO 2022, the bytes 0x1B (ESC), 0x0E (SO) and 0x0F (SI) are special control characters that aren't supposed to exist by themselves: ESC introduces the designation sequences that switch character sets (ESC $ B selects JIS X 0208, and so on), and iso2022_kr uses SO and SI to shift between ASCII and KS X 1001. There is no way to put the characters U+001B, U+000E or U+000F into an ISO-2022-JP or ISO-2022-KR byte stream; a 0x1B byte in the output is the start of an escape sequence to whoever reads it.
I would expect that attempting to encode these by themselves (or in some other invalid configuration) to be a failure state and raise UnicodeEncodeError (allowing error handlers do their thing), which is what they do for other characters the encoding has no bytes for.
What they actually do is write the control character through as a bare byte, because the encoder's ASCII fast path accepts every code point below 0x80, Modules/cjkcodecs/_codecs_iso2022.c lines 190-200. The output is not valid ISO 2022, and the matching decoder either rejects it or reads it as something else. Alone, the byte is an incomplete escape sequence:
>>> '\x1b'.encode('iso2022_jp')
b'\x1b'
>>> b'\x1b'.decode('iso2022_jp')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<python-input-2>", line 1, in <module>
b'\x1b'.decode('iso2022_jp')
~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
UnicodeDecodeError: 'iso2022_jp' codec can't decode byte 0x1b in position 0: incomplete multibyte sequence
Followed by the right ASCII characters, it is an escape sequence, and the text that follows is decoded in the wrong character set:
>>> 'x\x1b$B$"'.encode('iso2022_jp')
b'x\x1b$B$"'
>>> _.decode('iso2022_jp')
'xあ'
And in front of a real designation sequence it makes the decoder consume that sequence as text:
>>> '\x1b\xa0'.encode('iso2022_jp_2004')
b'\x1b\x1b$(Q)"\x1b(B'
>>> _.decode('iso2022_jp_2004')
'\x1b\x1b$(Q)"'
Every iso2022_* codec does this for U+001B. iso2022_kr does the same with SO and SI, which its decoder then interprets as shifts:
>>> '\x0e'.encode('iso2022_kr')
b'\x0e'
>>> _.decode('iso2022_kr')
''
>>> 'a\x0f가'.encode('iso2022_kr').decode('iso2022_kr')
'a가'
I do not think this can be fixed on the decoding side: the second example shows that a decoder cannot tell a stray ESC from a real one, so only refusing to encode these characters makes the round trip hold. Raising is a behavior change for text that currently encodes without complaint, but what it currently encodes to is misread by any ISO-2022 reader, not just Python's. For comparison, hz has the same problem with ~ and escapes it as ~~; the other CJK codecs pass ESC through, but for them it is an ordinary control character on both sides, so they round-trip.
Found by the Hypothesis tests in #160155, where it is pinned as RoundTripBugs.test_iso2022_escape under expectedFailure; the round-trip and error-handler tests there keep these characters out of the generated text for these codecs until it is fixed.
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 77.7k
- Fork
- 38.3k
- Merge medio
- 11h 58m
- PR unite (30g)
- 672
Preparare l'ambiente
Avvia il container di sviluppo del progetto nel browser, con il tuo account GitHub.
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di python/cpython
-
topic-socket type-bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
python/cpython#160561 · 7 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
tests topic-profiling type-bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
python/cpython#160334 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
extension-modules type-bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Remove unused FVS_* macrosApertainterpreter-core type-feature
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 78/100
python/cpython#160109 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
extension-modules type-bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
python/cpython#160001 · 3 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di python/cpython
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
Arekkazu/sgpmp-backend#744 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Review backlog (security): master-branch remote guard trusts unbound provenance package fieldApertaagent/reviewer
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
projectbluefin/utah-packages#634 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
enhancement good first issue help wanted
Difficoltà 2/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
home-assistant/core#188613 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
WebsiteApertagood first issue
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 91/100
TanbirRamim/open-source-radar#314 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno