[Bug]: Approving Devin's plan depends on the order of its plan-exit options, and one of them turns on bypass mode
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 3/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-2 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 62/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- typescript
- Ambito
- backend-api-design
Direzione di ricerca
Start by reading selectPermissionOptionId and selectAutoApprovedPermissionOption in packages/provider-acp/src/server/adapter.ts around lines 1302–1323, then trace how plan-exit permission options are selected for approval and automatic approval. Check how Devin's optionId values are handled. Done means approving a plan cannot select plan_bypass unless the user explicitly chooses it, regardless of option order.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Before submitting
- I searched existing issues and did not find a duplicate.
- I included enough detail to reproduce or investigate the problem.
Area
apps/server
Steps to reproduce
- Run
devin acpand create a session. - Call
session/set_modewithplan. - Prompt: "Make a one-step plan to add a file named a.txt and then ask me to approve it using your plan exit tool."
- Devin first sends a
tool_calltitled "Exit plan mode" withkind: "switch_mode", then asession/request_permissionfor the sametoolCallIdwith these options:
| optionId | kind | name |
|---|---|---|
plan_accept_edits |
allow_once |
Yes, implement plan and accept edits |
plan_bypass |
allow_once |
Yes, implement plan and bypass permissions |
reject_once |
reject_once |
No, plan needs changes |
- Compare with
selectPermissionOptionIdandselectAutoApprovedPermissionOptioninpackages/provider-acp/src/server/adapter.ts(https://github.com/pingdotgg/t3code/blob/79bca436b24a6eabb05d3d1a95348ae40d31e713/packages/provider-acp/src/server/adapter.ts#L1302-L1323).
I got the same list, in the same order, in seven sessions, including ones that entered plan mode from each of Devin's other modes (accept-edits, smart, ask, bypass). Devin also has a plan_normal option ("Yes, implement plan"), which I did not see offered. The problem doesn't depend on a particular Devin release. It applies whenever Devin offers more than one allow_once option on plan exit.
Expected behavior
Approving a plan should never put Devin into bypass mode unless the user chose that. If T3 offers only one "approve" button, it should choose plan_accept_edits (or plan_normal) by id, whatever the order.
Actual behavior
Devin gives both "yes" options the kind allow_once. T3 shows its default approval card, and both Approve and "Always allow this session" answer with the first allow_once option. Under full access, the automatic approval does the same. Today that is plan_accept_edits, which returns Devin to its default mode, so nothing goes wrong.
If Devin listed plan_bypass first, the same button would switch Devin to bypass mode, which approves every later tool call without asking. The card does not show which of the two T3 is choosing, and the user cannot pick the other.
ACP v1 says "kind is only a UI hint. The option name describes the scope" and says nothing about option order.
This is separate from #33136 and #33144, which change the "this session" choice only. #33144 leaves Approve answering with the first allow_once. It is also separate from #25553, which decides whether T3 asks before a mode switch, not which option it sends.
Possible fix
A Devin-specific choice for "accept" on plan-exit requests: prefer plan_normal, then plan_accept_edits, and never plan_bypass unless the user picked it. The automatic approval would use the same rule. A Devin approvalOptions could also show the choices with Devin's names, so the user can see and pick bypass deliberately. Matching on optionId avoids parsing the free-text name.
Impact
Minor bug or occasional failure. This is a latent risk. I have not seen T3 choose plan_bypass.
Version or commit
Current main. The code link above is pinned to a commit only so the line numbers stay correct. Not specific to a Devin version.
Environment
macOS, Apple silicon, Devin over ACP.
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 24.8k
- Fork
- 6.4k
- Merge medio
- 10h 56m
- PR unite (30g)
- 226
Preparare l'ambiente
Avvia il container di sviluppo del progetto nel browser, con il tuo account GitHub.
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di pingdotgg/t3code
-
[Bug]: request_secret file delivery has no trailing newline, and the tool text does not say soForse già presa Una pull request collegata a questa issue è aperta o già unita. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 69/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Bug]: Changing the sidebar project filter collapses an expanded Settled shelf back to 10 threadsAperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
pingdotgg/t3code#34291 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 83/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
via-triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di pingdotgg/t3code
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
community first-timers-only good first issue hacktoberfest help wanted low hanging fruit up-for-grabs
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 82/100
lingdojo/kana-dojo#33947 · 1 commento · 5 reazioni ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
paperclipai/paperclip#20942 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
area: documentation good first issue package: rule-data status: accepting prs
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
status: needs triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 85/100
mastra-ai/mastra#30109 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno