[Bug]: Approving Devin's plan depends on the order of its plan-exit options, and one of them turns on bypass mode
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 3/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-2 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 62/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
- Área
- backend-api-design
Línea de trabajo
Start by reading selectPermissionOptionId and selectAutoApprovedPermissionOption in packages/provider-acp/src/server/adapter.ts around lines 1302–1323, then trace how plan-exit permission options are selected for approval and automatic approval. Check how Devin's optionId values are handled. Done means approving a plan cannot select plan_bypass unless the user explicitly chooses it, regardless of option order.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Before submitting
- I searched existing issues and did not find a duplicate.
- I included enough detail to reproduce or investigate the problem.
Area
apps/server
Steps to reproduce
- Run
devin acpand create a session. - Call
session/set_modewithplan. - Prompt: "Make a one-step plan to add a file named a.txt and then ask me to approve it using your plan exit tool."
- Devin first sends a
tool_calltitled "Exit plan mode" withkind: "switch_mode", then asession/request_permissionfor the sametoolCallIdwith these options:
| optionId | kind | name |
|---|---|---|
plan_accept_edits |
allow_once |
Yes, implement plan and accept edits |
plan_bypass |
allow_once |
Yes, implement plan and bypass permissions |
reject_once |
reject_once |
No, plan needs changes |
- Compare with
selectPermissionOptionIdandselectAutoApprovedPermissionOptioninpackages/provider-acp/src/server/adapter.ts(https://github.com/pingdotgg/t3code/blob/79bca436b24a6eabb05d3d1a95348ae40d31e713/packages/provider-acp/src/server/adapter.ts#L1302-L1323).
I got the same list, in the same order, in seven sessions, including ones that entered plan mode from each of Devin's other modes (accept-edits, smart, ask, bypass). Devin also has a plan_normal option ("Yes, implement plan"), which I did not see offered. The problem doesn't depend on a particular Devin release. It applies whenever Devin offers more than one allow_once option on plan exit.
Expected behavior
Approving a plan should never put Devin into bypass mode unless the user chose that. If T3 offers only one "approve" button, it should choose plan_accept_edits (or plan_normal) by id, whatever the order.
Actual behavior
Devin gives both "yes" options the kind allow_once. T3 shows its default approval card, and both Approve and "Always allow this session" answer with the first allow_once option. Under full access, the automatic approval does the same. Today that is plan_accept_edits, which returns Devin to its default mode, so nothing goes wrong.
If Devin listed plan_bypass first, the same button would switch Devin to bypass mode, which approves every later tool call without asking. The card does not show which of the two T3 is choosing, and the user cannot pick the other.
ACP v1 says "kind is only a UI hint. The option name describes the scope" and says nothing about option order.
This is separate from #33136 and #33144, which change the "this session" choice only. #33144 leaves Approve answering with the first allow_once. It is also separate from #25553, which decides whether T3 asks before a mode switch, not which option it sends.
Possible fix
A Devin-specific choice for "accept" on plan-exit requests: prefer plan_normal, then plan_accept_edits, and never plan_bypass unless the user picked it. The automatic approval would use the same rule. A Devin approvalOptions could also show the choices with Devin's names, so the user can see and pick bypass deliberately. Matching on optionId avoids parsing the free-text name.
Impact
Minor bug or occasional failure. This is a latent risk. I have not seen T3 choose plan_bypass.
Version or commit
Current main. The code link above is pinned to a commit only so the line numbers stay correct. Not specific to a Devin version.
Environment
macOS, Apple silicon, Devin over ACP.
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 24.8k
- Forks
- 6.4k
- Merge medio
- 10 h 56 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 226
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de pingdotgg/t3code
-
[Bug]: request_secret file delivery has no trailing newline, and the tool text does not say soPosiblemente ocupada Un pull request vinculado a esta issue está abierto o ya se fusionó. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 69/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[Bug]: Changing the sidebar project filter collapses an expanded Settled shelf back to 10 threadsAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
pingdotgg/t3code#34291 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 83/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
via-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de pingdotgg/t3code
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
community first-timers-only good first issue hacktoberfest help wanted low hanging fruit up-for-grabs
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
lingdojo/kana-dojo#33947 · 1 comentario · 5 reacciones ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
paperclipai/paperclip#20942 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area: documentation good first issue package: rule-data status: accepting prs
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
status: needs triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
mastra-ai/mastra#30109 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día