Create an OpenSSF GitHub organization for pre-sandbox/prototype projects
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
Valutazione
Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.
Descrizione
The current Project lifecycle docs have guidelines for sandbox projects that are being developed within an existing OpenSSF WG, which mention that these projects should be hosted within the WG's Github organization.
The Problem
Based on feedback I've gotten from OpenSSF community members, there's a need for a space (i.e., GitHub organization) where early pre-sandbox projects can live while they mature enough to reach sandbox stage. This would enable community members to develop and collaborate on anticipated/future OpenSSF projects under the OpenSSF umbrella from the start.
A few reasons community members might want such a space:
- The project is in early prototype or pre-sandbox stages, and the most suitable host WG can't be identified yet.
- Even if a host WG has been identified, a tight coupling with the main WG repo may not always make sense. For example, high-turnover prototype development may pose an undue burden or cause permissioning issues on the main WG repo, especially if the project developers aren't the WG repo maintainers.
- The contributors are from different member OpenSSF member organizations. A dedicated OpenSSF GitHub organization avoids having to create random GitHub organizations for the project or hosting the project under one of the member orgs.
The Proposal
Establish an OpenSSF Labs GitHub organization that has a low barrier to entry while providing a clear pathway towards sandbox status under a WG. LF Hyperledger Labs may provide a good model for this.
The Challenges
We want to be careful not to create a way for this new GitHub organization to become a dumping ground for projects that are "being thrown over the fence". So, there must still be baseline requirements for applying for lab status and transitioning either to sandbox or archived status, in the event that the lab project gains traction or needs to be abandoned.
Checklist
Following the TAC's decision to support the creation of this new GH organization, we have the following outstanding tasks:
- Document new lab proposal process (see: HL labs process)
- Create proposal template (see HL labs template)
- Decide if we should establish group of dedicated labs stewards, a group whose responsibility is to vet labs proposals
- Create dedicated Github Org for labs projects
- Lingua principale
- Nessun dato sulla lingua
- Stelle
- 155
- Fork
- 89
- Merge medio
- 1g 23h
- PR unite (30g)
- 10
Preparare l'ambiente
Questo progetto non fornisce container di sviluppo, Dockerfile né guida per i contributori, quindi l'ambiente è a tuo carico: parti dal suo README e consulta la nostra guida al primo contributo per i passaggi generali.
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di ossf/tac
-
Broken links in TI funding reports README and several TI reportsForse già presa @NopeCharon l’ha presa 20 giorni fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 25/100
ossf/tac#686 · 1 commento · 1 reazione ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
gitvote gitvote/open
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 35/100
ossf/tac#682 · 5 commenti · 1 reazione ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
administration For Review gitvote gitvote/closed gitvote/passed TI Funding Request
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 8/100
ossf/tac#671 · 10 commenti · 1 reazione ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
[Technical Initiative Funding Request]: Sigstore PQC Design, Code & Infrastructure AuditForse di nuovo libera @Naomi-Wash l’ha presa 32 giorni fa e non c’è nessuna pull request aperta. Apertaadministration For Review gitvote gitvote/closed gitvote/passed TI Funding Request
ossf/tac#668 · 10 commenti · 2 assegnatari ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni