[BUG] before hooks do not receive the evaluation context returned by earlier before hooks
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 3/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-2 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 78/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- python
- Ambito
- backend-api-design
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia da OpenFeatureClient._establish_hooks_and_provider e _hook_support._execute_hooks_unchecked, quindi segui _run_before_hooks_and_update_context e la riduzione di before_hooks. Assicurati che ogni before hook successivo riceva i contributi precedenti, preservando al contempo il contesto finale unito del provider. Aggiungi un caso di regressione con due hook a livelli diversi che verifichi sia ciò che osserva il secondo hook sia ciò che riceve il provider.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Observed behaviour
Requirement 4.3.4 says:
Any
evaluation contextreturned from abeforehook MUST be passed to subsequentbefore
hooks (viaHookContext).
Each hook receives a HookContext built before any hook ran, so a hook never sees what an earlier
hook contributed.
The final merge into the evaluation context is correct — the provider does receive every hook's
contribution, so 3.2.2
and 4.3.5 are satisfied.
Only the propagation half is missing.
Reproducer
Against main (bd3b1e6):
from openfeature import api
from openfeature.client import OpenFeatureClient
from openfeature.evaluation_context import EvaluationContext
from openfeature.flag_evaluation import FlagEvaluationOptions
from openfeature.hook import Hook, HookContext
from openfeature.provider.in_memory_provider import InMemoryFlag, InMemoryProvider
observed = {}
class ContributingHook(Hook):
"""Adds one attribute, and records what it could see when it ran."""
def __init__(self, name, adds):
self.name = name
self.adds = adds
def before(self, hook_context: HookContext, hints):
observed[self.name] = dict(hook_context.evaluation_context.attributes)
return EvaluationContext(attributes=self.adds)
class RecordingProvider(InMemoryProvider):
def resolve_boolean_details(self, flag_key, default_value, evaluation_context=None):
observed["provider"] = dict(evaluation_context.attributes) if evaluation_context else {}
return super().resolve_boolean_details(flag_key, default_value, evaluation_context)
api.set_provider(RecordingProvider({"flag": InMemoryFlag("on", {"on": True, "off": False})}))
client: OpenFeatureClient = api.get_client()
client.add_hooks([ContributingHook("hook_a", {"from_hook_a": "a"})])
# hook_b is an invocation hook, so it runs after the client hook (API -> client -> invocation).
client.get_boolean_details(
"flag",
False,
evaluation_context=EvaluationContext(attributes={"from_invocation": "i"}),
flag_evaluation_options=FlagEvaluationOptions(
hooks=[ContributingHook("hook_b", {"from_hook_b": "b"})]
),
)
print("hook_a saw :", observed["hook_a"])
print("hook_b saw :", observed["hook_b"])
print("provider :", observed["provider"])
Output:
hook_a saw : {'from_invocation': 'i'}
hook_b saw : {'from_invocation': 'i'}
provider : {'from_invocation': 'i', 'from_hook_a': 'a', 'from_hook_b': 'b'}
hook_b should have seen from_hook_a: a. The provider line shows the final merge is fine.
Cause
OpenFeatureClient._establish_hooks_and_provider constructs one HookContext per hook up front,
all from the same merged_eval_context:
merged_hooks_and_context = [
(
hook,
HookContext(
flag_key=flag_key,
flag_type=flag_type,
default_value=default_value,
evaluation_context=merged_eval_context,
client_metadata=client_metadata,
provider_metadata=provider_metadata,
hook_data={},
),
)
for hook in chain(get_hooks(), self.hooks, evaluation_hooks, provider.get_provider_hooks())
]
_hook_support._execute_hooks_unchecked then iterates those pairs without ever updating one:
return [
getattr(hook, hook_method.value)(hook_context=hook_context, **kwargs)
for (hook, hook_context) in hooks_and_context
if hook.supports_flag_value_type(flag_type)
]
before_hooks reduces the results correctly (reduce(lambda a, b: a.merge(b), filtered_hooks)),
which is why the provider still gets everything — but that accumulation is never fed back into the
hook contexts.
The docstring on _run_before_hooks_and_update_context cites 4.3.4 while implementing only the
merge half.
Suggested fix
Accumulate as the hooks run and refresh the context handed to each subsequent hook, rather than
collecting results and merging once at the end. Roughly:
def before_hooks(flag_type, hooks_and_context, hints=None):
accumulated = EvaluationContext()
for hook, hook_context in hooks_and_context:
if not hook.supports_flag_value_type(flag_type):
continue
hook_context.evaluation_context = hook_context.evaluation_context.merge(accumulated)
result = hook.before(hook_context=hook_context, hints=hints)
if result is not None:
accumulated = accumulated.merge(result)
return accumulated
HookContext is a plain mutable class (__init__-assigned attributes, not frozen), so assigning
evaluation_context in place works; rebuilding the context per hook is equally fine. dotnet-sdk does
the latter (WithNewEvaluationContext applied to every pending hook context); ruby-sdk does the
former.
Cross-language note
Surveyed 2026-09-14 — js-sdk, java-sdk, dotnet-sdk and ruby-sdk all propagate correctly.
go-sdk had a related but distinct bug (results replaced rather than merged), reported as
go-sdk#549 and fixed by
go-sdk#569. php-sdk has the same propagation gap
as this one.
Given four SDKs have now been found wanting on one half or the other, this seems like a good
candidate for a shared e2e/TCK case: two before hooks at different levels, each returning a distinct
key; assert both reach the provider and that the second hook observed the first's key. Asserting
only the merged result would miss this bug entirely.
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 111
- Fork
- 44
- Merge medio
- 2h 37m
- PR unite (30g)
- 14
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di open-feature/python-sdk
-
question
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 38/100
open-feature/python-sdk#627 ·
-
Spec v0.9.0 compliance Apertav0.9.0
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 25/100
open-feature/python-sdk#618 ·
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 55/100
open-feature/python-sdk#615 ·
-
open-feature/python-sdk#584 · 1 assegnatario ·
-
multi-provider
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 25/100
open-feature/python-sdk#568 ·
Tutte le issue di open-feature/python-sdk
Issue simili
-
area: harness bug status: needs-triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
Human-Agent-Society/reef#625 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 80/100
learningequality/kolibri#15351 · 2 commenti ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
-
Name consistency Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
eellak/triplestore#65 · 1 commento ·