[Question] Where to investigate DMAR interrupt-remap warning observed near four-B70 initialization?
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Da chiarire
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- cpp, linux, ubuntu
- Ambito
- backend, operating-systems
Direzione di ricerca
The issue does not identify a compute-runtime file, test, or confirmed runtime version, and asks who owns the warning. Start by checking the kernel’s DMAR/IOMMU logs and PCI device inventory alongside the compute-runtime version and a minimal reproducer; the issue provides no specific commands or files to begin with. Done means identifying the appropriate owning team and the non-invasive evidence needed to triage the source.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Question Category
Compatibility
Question
On an Ubuntu 26.04.1 four-Intel-Arc-Pro-B70 system, we observed the Linux kernel report an interrupt-remapping source-ID verification failure around Level Zero/oneCCL initialization. Is this appropriate for compute-runtime triage, or should we report it to a kernel IOMMU, board/firmware or other team? Which specific non-invasive logs would help identify the source?
DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2
DMAR: [INTR-REMAP] Request device [00:1b.4] fault index 0x2 [fault reason 0x26] Blocked an interrupt request due to source-id verification failure
We are not asserting a compute-runtime or GPU-driver defect. The same pair appeared at boot and again outside the test container's lifetime. The printed 00:1b.4 did not correspond to an enumerated 0000:00:1b.4 in our inspection. Another PCI address, 0000:24:1b.4, is distinct and has not been identified as the requester.
Additional Notes
- ASUS Pro WS W890E-SAGE SE, BIOS 0507; 4 x Arc Pro B70; Ubuntu 26.04.1, kernel
7.0.0-43-generic, kernel driverxe. - A synthetic, model-free four-process Torch XPU / oneCCL all-reduce test was stopped by our monitor after the pair appeared during startup. The retained output did not show a completed collective; this is not evidence the collective failed. The same pair was observed again around 55 seconds after the container was removed.
- An earlier Ornith model service returned responses after the same warning. That does not prove the warning is harmless or that unrelated devices are unaffected.
- Torch
2.11.0+xpu, Triton XPU3.7.0; a locally adapted vLLM/oneCCL stack and rebuilt extension were present, but the selected oneCCL implementation has not been verified. A minimal portable reproducer and current compute-runtime driver version have not yet been established. - We searched this repository for
DMARandINTR-REMAP; we did not find a matching report. We have not verified that the installed GPU runtime is the latest version.
We would appreciate guidance on the correct owner and useful evidence before proposing any workaround or attributing the fault to a particular component.
Related environment discussion: https://github.com/steveseguin/b70-optimization-lab/issues/84
- Lingua principale
- C++
- Stelle
- 1.5k
- Fork
- 306
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di intel/compute-runtime
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
intel/compute-runtime#1040 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
intel/compute-runtime#943 ·
-
Type: Feature Request
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 25/100
intel/compute-runtime#1053 ·
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 35/100
intel/compute-runtime#1052 ·
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 35/100
intel/compute-runtime#1051 · 1 commento ·
Tutte le issue di intel/compute-runtime
Issue simili
-
runtime: lf_f128_mod is documented as fmodq (truncating) but implements floor-based modulo; unusedApertainternal correctness low priority rt_lib
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 87/100
-
PriorityNotificationQueue::wakeUpAll() loses the wake-up for a thread that is not waiting yetForse già presa @matejk l’ha presa oggi. Apertabug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
pocoproject/poco#5674 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
bug docs GUI
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 62/100
sonic-pi-net/sonic-pi#3609 ·
-
Unreachable code warningApertabug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
SanderMertens/flecs#2395 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno