[Question] Where to investigate DMAR interrupt-remap warning observed near four-B70 initialization?
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- cpp, linux, ubuntu
- Área
- backend, operating-systems
Línea de trabajo
The issue does not identify a compute-runtime file, test, or confirmed runtime version, and asks who owns the warning. Start by checking the kernel’s DMAR/IOMMU logs and PCI device inventory alongside the compute-runtime version and a minimal reproducer; the issue provides no specific commands or files to begin with. Done means identifying the appropriate owning team and the non-invasive evidence needed to triage the source.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Question Category
Compatibility
Question
On an Ubuntu 26.04.1 four-Intel-Arc-Pro-B70 system, we observed the Linux kernel report an interrupt-remapping source-ID verification failure around Level Zero/oneCCL initialization. Is this appropriate for compute-runtime triage, or should we report it to a kernel IOMMU, board/firmware or other team? Which specific non-invasive logs would help identify the source?
DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2
DMAR: [INTR-REMAP] Request device [00:1b.4] fault index 0x2 [fault reason 0x26] Blocked an interrupt request due to source-id verification failure
We are not asserting a compute-runtime or GPU-driver defect. The same pair appeared at boot and again outside the test container's lifetime. The printed 00:1b.4 did not correspond to an enumerated 0000:00:1b.4 in our inspection. Another PCI address, 0000:24:1b.4, is distinct and has not been identified as the requester.
Additional Notes
- ASUS Pro WS W890E-SAGE SE, BIOS 0507; 4 x Arc Pro B70; Ubuntu 26.04.1, kernel
7.0.0-43-generic, kernel driverxe. - A synthetic, model-free four-process Torch XPU / oneCCL all-reduce test was stopped by our monitor after the pair appeared during startup. The retained output did not show a completed collective; this is not evidence the collective failed. The same pair was observed again around 55 seconds after the container was removed.
- An earlier Ornith model service returned responses after the same warning. That does not prove the warning is harmless or that unrelated devices are unaffected.
- Torch
2.11.0+xpu, Triton XPU3.7.0; a locally adapted vLLM/oneCCL stack and rebuilt extension were present, but the selected oneCCL implementation has not been verified. A minimal portable reproducer and current compute-runtime driver version have not yet been established. - We searched this repository for
DMARandINTR-REMAP; we did not find a matching report. We have not verified that the installed GPU runtime is the latest version.
We would appreciate guidance on the correct owner and useful evidence before proposing any workaround or attributing the fault to a particular component.
Related environment discussion: https://github.com/steveseguin/b70-optimization-lab/issues/84
- Lenguaje dominante
- C++
- Estrellas
- 1.5k
- Forks
- 306
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de intel/compute-runtime
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
intel/compute-runtime#1040 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
intel/compute-runtime#943 ·
-
Type: Feature Request
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
intel/compute-runtime#1053 ·
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
intel/compute-runtime#1052 ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
intel/compute-runtime#1051 · 1 comentario ·
Todos los issues de intel/compute-runtime
Issues similares
-
runtime: lf_f128_mod is documented as fmodq (truncating) but implements floor-based modulo; unusedAbiertointernal correctness low priority rt_lib
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 87/100
-
PriorityNotificationQueue::wakeUpAll() loses the wake-up for a thread that is not waiting yetPosiblemente ocupada @matejk la tomó hoy. Abiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
pocoproject/poco#5674 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
bug docs GUI
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
sonic-pi-net/sonic-pi#3609 ·
-
Unreachable code warningAbiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
SanderMertens/flecs#2395 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día