[uk-ai-advisory:campaign-improvement] [UK-AI-020] Gate closure advice on minimum-standard evidence
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 45/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- github-actions
- Ambito
- devops
Direzione di ricerca
Start by reading .github/workflows/uk-ai-advisory-operational-resilience.md and locate its C/D scoring gate, Open-Code Exception Register, and minimum-standard verification. Check the related tests or contract fixtures to see how the advisory outputs are validated. Done means unmet or unevidenced capabilities cap recommendations at B, while fully evidenced exceptions still require every listed safeguard and preserve open-by-default behavior and human review.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Why this matters
The authoritative GOV.UK guidance says that only once a system meets the minimum operational standard may leaders use the existing exception rule for a specific, credible publication harm. Privacy must not compensate for missing ownership, maintenance, patching, or operational assurance. Source verified 2026-10-22: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/ai-open-code-and-vulnerability-risk-in-the-public-sector.
Observed campaign evidence
.github/workflows/uk-ai-advisory-operational-resilience.mdseparately performs minimum-standard verification and says privacy and closure do not substitute for controls or remediation.- Its C/D scoring gate and Open-Code Exception Register require the threat-model triad and exception fields, but do not require satisfactory minimum-standard evidence before a C or D closure recommendation.
- The durable ledger records this gap as
UK-AI-020with statusPARTIAL.
Requested improvement
Add a fail-closed closure-eligibility gate to the operational-resilience advisory. This is an advisory boundary only: it must not authorize opening, restricting, hiding, or decommissioning code.
Acceptance criteria
- A C or D closure recommendation is ineligible whenever any minimum-standard capability is failed, partial, inaccessible, or unevidenced.
- In that state, the workflow caps the proposed tier at B and recommends remediation or retirement review rather than privacy as a substitute control.
- A satisfactory gate remains necessary but never sufficient for closure; the credible-attacker, publication-added-risk, realistic-harm-path, narrow scope, expiry, ownership, mitigation, and periodic re-approval requirements remain mandatory.
- Outputs remain non-binding, incomplete by design, and explicitly require human review.
- Tests or contract fixtures cover both an unmet-minimum-standard case and a fully evidenced exception case while preserving the open-by-default model.
Generated by 📋 UK AI Advisory / Maintenance · pi · gpt56 · 60.8 AIC · ⌖ 25.7 AIC · ⊞ 9.7K · ◷
- expires on Nov 21, 2026, 9:41 AM UTC
- Lingua principale
- JavaScript
- Stelle
- 8
- Fork
- 5
- Merge medio
- 2h 12m
- PR unite (30g)
- 852
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di githubnext/gh-cao
-
repo-assist repo-assist:issue-triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 66/100
githubnext/gh-cao#19642 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
agentic-workflows self-care self-care:reactive-ui-expert
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 65/100
githubnext/gh-cao#19591 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
software-development-practices software-development-practices:nist-ssdf
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
githubnext/gh-cao#19534 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
cao-evolution cao-evolution:compiler-security
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
githubnext/gh-cao#19373 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
self-care self-care:dashboard-review
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
githubnext/gh-cao#18518 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di githubnext/gh-cao
Issue simili
-
Add: Divya Darshan TV LogoApertacheck:passed logos:add
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 68/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 6 giorni
-
cvss-severity:high devguard l3montree-cybersecurity/.../devguard-documentation pkg:oci/devguard-documen...ch=amd64&tag=main-amd64 risk:low state:open
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 75/100
l3montree-dev/devguard-documentation#365 · 1 commento ·
-
docs
Difficoltà 1/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
idean3885/claude-ops-agent#811 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
external-plugin ready-for-review third party
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
github/awesome-copilot#5713 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
curriculum documentation quality
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#5038 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno