[workflow-editor] Remove duplicate golden-ticket billing guidance from guidelines.md
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 2/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-3 ore
- Idoneità per principianti
- 82/100
- Tipo di issue
- Documentazione
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- github-actions
- Ambito
- documentation
Direzione di ricerca
Modifica .github/workflows/guidelines.md, confrontando la dichiarazione dettagliata di Golden-Ticket sotto "Workshop delivery assumptions" con il duplicato sotto "Golden-Ticket Workshop Surfaces". Mantieni la regola dettagliata e sostituisci la ripetizione con un riferimento su una sola riga, quindi valida i sette workflow dipendenti con --validate e conferma che il contenuto di nessun file di lock sia cambiato.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
[!CAUTION]
Protected files were modified in this change.
This pull request is inrequest_reviewmode and requires explicit human scrutiny before merge.Protected files:
.github/workflows/guidelines.md
What changed
.github/workflows/guidelines.md stated the golden-ticket org/billing provisioning rule twice, nearly verbatim:
- "Workshop delivery assumptions" →
Org and billing are pre-provisioned. - "Golden-Ticket Workshop Surfaces" →
Org provisioning and billing are handled by the golden-ticket system.
Both bullets said the provisioning tooling creates the workshop org, assigns Copilot seats, and covers billing, and that core workshop content should not include org/billing setup steps. Keeping both forces every workflow that imports this shared guidelines file to re-read the same instruction twice.
Fix
Kept the detailed statement in "Workshop delivery assumptions" (the first and more complete occurrence) and shortened the "Golden-Ticket Workshop Surfaces" bullet to a one-line summary that points back to it, instead of repeating the full rule.
File changed
.github/workflows/guidelines.md(one bullet shortened, no behavior change)
Why this is more Skills-like
GitHub Skills lessons state a rule once and reference it, rather than restating full guidance in multiple sections. This keeps the shared guidelines file leaner for every dependent workflow (guidelines-enforcer, side-quest, security-side-quest, workshop-author, workshop-explanatory-diagrams, workshop-skill-activity-author, workshop-ui-screenshots) that reads it, without losing any guidance — the full rule is still stated once, just not twice.
No lock files needed regeneration: guidelines.md is referenced by path (not inlined) in the dependent workflows, so I validated by recompiling all seven dependent workflows with --validate and confirmed no lock file content changed as a result of this edit.
[!WARNING]
Firewall blocked 1 domain
The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:
registry.npmjs.orgTo allow these domains, add them to the
network.allowedlist in your workflow frontmatter:network: allowed: - defaults - "registry.npmjs.org"See Network Configuration for more information.
Generated by ✂️ Workflow Skills Editor · copilot · auto · 54.7 AIC · ⌖ 8.2 AIC · ⊞ 9.5K · ◷
- expires on Oct 4, 2026, 7:42 AM UTC
[!NOTE]
This was originally intended as a pull request, but the git push operation failed.Original error: The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 1
Workflow Run: View run details and download bundle artifact
The bundle file is available in the
agentartifact in the workflow run linked above.
Create the pull request manually
# Download the artifact from the workflow run
gh run download '37106933547' -n agent -D '/tmp/agent-37106933547'
# Resolve the bundle source ref, fetch it into a temporary ref, then create the local branch
bundle_path='/tmp/agent-37106933547/aw-workflow-editor-dedup-golden-ticket-guidelines.bundle'
temp_ref='refs/bundles/create-pr-workflow-editor-dedup-golden-ticket-guidelines-4f616f84ace678f0-9ac95883'
target_ref='refs/heads/workflow-editor/dedup-golden-ticket-guidelines-4f616f84ace678f0'
bundle_source_ref=$(git bundle list-heads "$bundle_path" | awk '$2 ~ /^refs\/heads\// { print $2 }')
if [ -z "$bundle_source_ref" ]; then
bundle_source_ref=$(git bundle list-heads "$bundle_path" | awk '$2 == "HEAD" { print $2 }')
fi
if [ "$(printf '%s\n' "$bundle_source_ref" | sed '/^$/d' | wc -l | tr -d ' ')" != "1" ]; then
echo "Expected exactly one bundle source ref, found: $bundle_source_ref" >&2
exit 1
fi
git fetch "$bundle_path" "${bundle_source_ref}:${temp_ref}"
git update-ref "$target_ref" "$temp_ref"
git checkout 'workflow-editor/dedup-golden-ticket-guidelines-4f616f84ace678f0'
# Ensure the working tree matches the updated branch
git reset --hard
# Remove the temporary bundle ref
git update-ref -d "$temp_ref"
# Push the branch to the target remote
git push 'origin' 'workflow-editor/dedup-golden-ticket-guidelines-4f616f84ace678f0'
# Create the pull request
gh pr create --title '[workflow-editor] Remove duplicate golden-ticket billing guidance from guidelines.md' --base 'main' --head 'workflow-editor/dedup-golden-ticket-guidelines-4f616f84ace678f0' --repo 'githubnext/gh-aw-workshop'
- Lingua principale
- JavaScript
- Stelle
- 55
- Fork
- 36
- Merge medio
- 1g 6h
- PR unite (30g)
- 15
Preparare l'ambiente
Avvia il container di sviluppo del progetto nel browser, con il tuo account GitHub.
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Nessuna guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di githubnext/gh-aw-workshop
-
curriculum documentation quality
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 83/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4824 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[workshop-sync] workshop/side-quest-06-02-cca-codespace.md: misleading authentication doc linkApertadocumentation
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 84/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4803 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
curriculum documentation quality
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4802 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
curriculum documentation quality
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4800 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
documentation guidelines
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 90/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4670 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di githubnext/gh-aw-workshop
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 65/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
docs
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
idean3885/claude-ops-agent#765 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
docs html v6
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Edit: Al Janoubiya TV SDApertacheck:failed feeds:edit
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 62/100
iptv-org/database#38385 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 6 giorni
-
release-followup
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno