Document and guard against empty optional fields in Codex spawn_agent calls
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 3/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-2 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 75/100
- Tipo di issue
- Documentazione
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Tranquilla
- Stack tecnologico
- typescript
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia da plugins/omo/skills/visual-qa/SKILL.md, plugins/omo/skills/ulw-loop/SKILL.md e plugins/omo/components/rules/bundled-rules/hephaestus/gpt-5.5.md, quindi esamina i test di skill-sync o rule-generation. Esegui i test di sync-skills, ulw-loop, visual-qa e della regola Hephaestus; il lavoro è completato quando le indicazioni Codex generate dicono coerentemente di omettere le chiavi spawn_agent opzionali non impostate e verificano payload V1 validi.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Summary
LazyCodex's Codex-facing skill/rule guidance depends heavily on native spawn_agent, but current Codex tool parsing rejects common empty optional-field shapes. Until upstream normalizes those fields, LazyCodex should make its generated guidance and any spawn guardrails explicitly tell agents to omit unused optional keys, especially items: [], message: \"\", model: \"\", reasoning_effort: \"\", and service_tier: \"\".
Upstream issue filed: https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/37037
Environment
- Codex CLI on PATH:
codex-cli 0.146.0 - Runtime: Codex Desktop / ChatGPT-auth session exposing
multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent - OS: macOS 26.5.2, Darwin 25.5.0 arm64
- Node:
v26.6.0 - LazyCodex source checked:
code-yeongyu/lazycodexmainatfb48ddc4bc8be02a0cfe0a509a30cf3543edf72a - Upstream Codex source checked:
openai/codexmainat1fe6be9719ac4a18ad08f8341b89f9a0f386105e
Repository Decision
- Target repository:
code-yeongyu/lazycodex - Why this belongs here: the root parser bug is upstream Codex, but LazyCodex ships the skills/rules that repeatedly instruct agents to dispatch subagents through
multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent/ flatspawn_agent. A downstream compatibility issue is useful so LazyCodex can harden its generated instructions and guardrails while waiting for upstream. - LazyCodex evidence:
plugins/omo/skills/visual-qa/SKILL.md:6-22maps OpenCode examples to Codexmulti_agent_v1.spawn_agentcalls.plugins/omo/components/rules/bundled-rules/hephaestus/gpt-5.5.md:42-44tells agents to spawn subagents viamulti_agent_v1.spawn_agent({"message":"...","fork_context":false}).plugins/omo/skills/ulw-loop/SKILL.md:56-66already gives a good V2 warning not to setagent_type/model/reasoning_effort; V1 guidance could use similarly explicit "omit empty optional keys" wording.
- Upstream Codex evidence:
codex-rs/core/src/tools/handlers/multi_agents_common.rs:137-144rejectsSome(message), Some(items)without treating empty unused values as absent.codex-rs/protocol/src/openai_models.rs:119-133rejects emptyreasoning_effortduring deserialization.
Reproduction
In a Codex session exposing multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent, attempts with serialized empty optional fields failed as follows:
message: \"...task...\"plusitems: []returned:
Provide either message or items, but not both
items: [{ type: \"text\", text: \"...task...\" }]plusmessage: \"\"returned:
Provide either message or items, but not both
reasoning_effort: \"\"returned:
failed to parse function arguments: reasoning_effort must not be empty at line 1 column 219
Expected Behavior
LazyCodex-generated instructions should make the valid payload shape unambiguous for both tool surfaces:
- For V1: pass only
message,agent_typewhen needed, andfork_context; omititems,model,reasoning_effort, andservice_tierunless they are intentionally non-empty. - For V2: pass only
task_name,message, andfork_turnsunless the active schema explicitly exposes additional non-empty fields. - Never emit empty placeholder values for optional spawn fields.
Actual Behavior
The current shipped guidance mostly shows minimal calls, but it does not consistently warn that empty optional fields are actively dangerous on the native tool surface. In a real visual QA workflow, this caused subagent dispatch to fail and forced the parent agent to continue single-threaded.
Evidence
- Live Codex Desktop tool-call failures on 2026-08-05.
- Source-backed upstream root cause captured in https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/37037.
- LazyCodex source references above show the downstream surface area likely affected by this parser sharp edge.
Root Cause
Upstream Codex currently treats empty optional values as supplied, while LazyCodex guidance assumes agents can safely follow the model-visible shape and omit optional fields. When a caller/tool wrapper serializes empty defaults, the upstream parser rejects the call before a subagent is spawned.
Proposed Fix
- Update Codex subagent compatibility sections in shared LazyCodex skill/rule templates to explicitly say: omit optional keys entirely when unset; do not pass empty
items, emptymessage, or empty override strings. - Add a small regression/fixture in the skill sync or rule generation tests to preserve this warning in generated skills that mention
spawn_agent. - If LazyCodex has any hook or guard that inspects tool-call payloads before execution, consider warning when
spawn_agentincludesitems: [],message: \"\", or empty override strings.
Verification Plan
- Regenerate/sync skills and confirm all shared Codex harness compatibility blocks contain the warning.
- Run LazyCodex skill/rule tests touching
sync-skills,ulw-loop,visual-qa, and Hephaestus bundled rules. - Manually validate a V1 spawn call with only non-empty keys in a Codex session.
This issue or PR was generated by LazyCodex.
Tag: lazycodex-generated
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 3.8k
- Fork
- 243
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g
Preparare l'ambiente
Questo progetto non fornisce container di sviluppo, Dockerfile né guida per i contributori, quindi l'ambiente è a tuo carico: parti dal suo README e consulta la nostra guida al primo contributo per i passaggi generali.
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di code-yeongyu/lazycodex
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
code-yeongyu/lazycodex#170 ·
-
Fix Codex browser QA routing before standalone PlaywrightForse già presa @berkshirehathaways l’ha presa 75 giorni fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 72/100
code-yeongyu/lazycodex#148 ·
-
[5.0.0-beta.78] High cost and rapid quota consumption: use role-appropriate agent model defaultsAperta
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 48/100
code-yeongyu/lazycodex#166 ·
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 35/100
code-yeongyu/lazycodex#163 ·
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 35/100
code-yeongyu/lazycodex#158 ·
Tutte le issue di code-yeongyu/lazycodex
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
apache/rocketmq-dashboard#6872 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 3 giorni
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
fab-geocommuns/RNB-site#539 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
Guest multiview tile label leaks raw virtual-source-id "Whip" instead of the guest name / slot labelAperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 62/100
Eyevinn/open-live-studio#211 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
documentation good first issue
Difficoltà 2/5 Mezza giornata Idoneità per principianti 72/100
sujithputta02/Esapay#13 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
ehmpathy/rhachet-roles-bhuild#468 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno