Cache worker lowers the priority of the whole process on macOS
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- linux, macos, rust
- Ambito
- backend, performance
Direzione di ricerca
Start with crates/cache/src/worker.rs and inspect WorkerThread::lower_thread_priority and its platform-specific branches. Check the priority APIs used on Linux, Android, Apple targets, and other Unix targets, then add or run a test that verifies cache worker startup does not lower the macOS process priority. Done means the worker priority is handled per the platform behavior described in the issue, without changing the host process priority.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Problem
WorkerThread::lower_thread_priority in crates/cache/src/worker.rs calls
rustix::process::nice(3) on every target other than Windows and Fuchsia. The
intent is to lower the priority of the cache worker thread only.
On Linux, nice changes only the calling thread, so the code does what it
intends. On macOS, nice and setpriority(PRIO_PROCESS, 0, ...) change the
whole process. Apple's setpriority(2) man page states: "The setpriority()
call sets the priorities of all of the specified processes to the specified
value", where who = 0 denotes the current process. Thread-level control on
macOS uses PRIO_DARWIN_THREAD or the pthread QoS API, not PRIO_PROCESS.
As a result, each Cache (each one starts its own worker thread) adds 3 to
the nice value of the whole embedding process. All threads of the process and
every child process that it spawns after that inherit the value. An
unprivileged process cannot lower its nice value again.
The other BSDs also apply nice per process, as far as I know. I tested
only macOS.
Steps to Reproduce
[dependencies]
libc = "0.2"
wasmtime = { version = "50.0.1", default-features = false, features = ["cache", "cranelift", "runtime", "wat"] }
use wasmtime::{Cache, CacheConfig, Config, Engine, Module, Result};
fn process_nice() -> i32 {
unsafe { libc::getpriority(libc::PRIO_PROCESS, 0) }
}
fn main() -> Result<()> {
println!("nice before engine: {}", process_nice());
let mut cache_config = CacheConfig::new();
cache_config.with_directory(std::env::temp_dir().join("cache-nice-repro"));
let mut config = Config::new();
config.cache(Some(Cache::new(cache_config)?));
let engine = Engine::new(&config)?;
Module::new(&engine, "(module)")?;
std::thread::sleep(std::time::Duration::from_millis(500));
println!("nice after engine: {}", process_nice());
let child = std::process::Command::new("sh").args(["-c", "ps -o nice= -p $$"]).output()?;
print!("child process nice: {}", String::from_utf8_lossy(&child.stdout));
Ok(())
}
Expected Results
nice before engine: 0
nice after engine: 0
child process nice: 0
Actual Results
nice before engine: 0
nice after engine: 3
child process nice: 3
Impact
Any host that enables the cache on macOS is affected, also indirectly. For
example, a host that embeds Extism with its default cache configuration and
creates five or six engines runs at nice 15 to 18. Every process that the
host starts, such as dev servers and test runners, then also runs at nice 15
to 18, and the user cannot undo it without root. With the cache turned off,
the host stays at nice 0.
Versions and Environment
Wasmtime version or commit: main at 33b89be (the same code is in v50.0.1)
Operating system: macOS 27.0.1
Architecture: aarch64
Proposed fix
- Linux and Android: keep
nice(3), which is per thread there. - Apple targets: call
pthread_set_qos_class_self_np(QOS_CLASS_UTILITY, 0),
which changes only the calling thread. - Other Unix targets: do not change the priority, and write a debug log.
The Fuchsia branch is already a no-op in the same way.
I have a PR ready with this change and a test.
- Lingua principale
- Rust
- Stelle
- 18.8k
- Fork
- 1.9k
- Merge medio
- 1g 3h
- PR unite (30g)
- 382
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di bytecodealliance/wasmtime
-
bug wasm-proposal:exceptions wasmtime:debugging
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
bytecodealliance/wasmtime#14102 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
wasm-proposal:gc
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 62/100
bytecodealliance/wasmtime#13808 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 20/100
bytecodealliance/wasmtime#15193 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
awfy performance
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 44/100
bytecodealliance/wasmtime#15192 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 46/100
bytecodealliance/wasmtime#15168 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di bytecodealliance/wasmtime
Issue simili
-
enhancement
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
-
bug order-flow studies ui
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
userFRM/egui-charts#2417 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
In a plain-text message, Font, Font Size, Font Color and Text Highlight Color stay liveForse già presa @ragelfundionctrumnar l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
UCS-Care-Group/mailcraft#862 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
smoltcp-rs/smoltcp#1243 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno