[Bug]: TagBatch reuses a cached PlcReadRequest bound to a closed connection, so fetches fail after the first and never recover after a PLC restart
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
@chrisdutz ci sta già lavorando.
Dal 26/10/2026.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 3/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-2 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 72/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- java
- Ambito
- embedded-iot, networking
Direzione di ricerca
Read plc4j/tools/event-pump/src/main/java/org/apache/plc4x/java/tools/eventpump/TagBatch.java, focusing on fetchTags(), request caching, connection closing, and invalidateCache(). Reproduce with the issue's TagBatch example using DefaultPlcDriverManager, then repeat with PlcConnectionCache and restart the Modbus simulator. Done means later fetches use the current connection and continue after a PLC restart; add or update event-pump tests covering repeated fetches and recovery.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
What happened?
TagBatch in plc4j-tools-event-pump builds its PlcReadRequest once and caches it (keyed only on the tag snapshot), but it obtains a connection from the configured PlcConnectionFactory on every fetch and closes that connection after the fetch. A PlcReadRequest is bound to the connection whose builder created it (DefaultPlcReadRequest keeps the PlcReader; execute() calls reader.read(this)), so the cached request keeps targeting the connection of the first fetch. Once that connection is closed, every later fetch fails without ever using the connection that was just opened for it.
Observed against a Modbus TCP simulator (oitc/modbus-server, Docker) with plc4j-tools-event-pump 1.0.0, plc4j-driver-modbus 1.0.0, TimerTrigger(100 ms), three tags (coil:1, holding-register:1:INT, holding-register:2:INT):
DefaultPlcDriverManageras connection factory (a new connection per fetch): fetch 1 succeeds, fetch 2 and every later attempt fail immediately withPlcRuntimeException: Failed to send request, root causeTransportException: Transport is closedatTcpTransportInstance.ensureOpen(TcpTransportInstance.java:319). Each attempt still logs "Modbus TCP connection established" for a connection that is never used. In 5 s: 1 fetch, 3 errors, back-off 1 s, 2 s, 4 s.PlcConnectionCacheas connection factory (one physical connection, a lease per fetch): 49 fetches in 5 s while the simulator is up. Afterdocker stop/docker startof the simulator the batch never recovers: 0 fetches in the following 65 s, every attempt fails withTransport is closed, and no "Connection refused" ever appears because the network is never touched. Even after the cache's idle validation detected the dead connection and opened a new one (at about +58 s), the next fetch failed again: the cached request still targets the old connection.
Cause, same on develop as in 1.0.0 (plc4j/tools/event-pump/src/main/java/org/apache/plc4x/java/tools/eventpump/TagBatch.java):
fetchTags()callsconnectionFactory.getConnection(connectionString)per fetch (line 516) and closes the connection in the completion handler (lines 604 and 621).- The read request is cached in
cachedReadRequest/cachedTagSnapshot(lines 122-123) and reused whenever the tag snapshot is unchanged (lines 529-541). invalidateCache()(lines 712-715) is private and is only called byaddTag(s)/removeTag(s)/clearTags, never on a fetch error or on a different connection.
Expected: a fetch executes its read request on the connection it obtained for that fetch, so a batch over DefaultPlcDriverManager keeps working and a batch over PlcConnectionCache recovers once the PLC is reachable again (the back-off then does its job instead of retrying a dead request forever).
Possible fixes, in order of simplicity: build the request on the connection of the current fetch (the PlcReadRequest.Builder cost is small compared to a network round trip); or cache the request per connection instance; or at least call invalidateCache() on every fetch error.
Workaround we verified: calling removeTag(name) + addTag(name, address) from TagBatchListener.onError forces a rebuild; with PlcConnectionCache the batch then recovers after a simulator restart (275 fetches in the 30 s after docker start, 3 errors in total). Side effect: the tag order in later responses changes.
Reproduction (JDK 21, plc4j-api, plc4j-tools-event-pump, plc4j-driver-modbus 1.0.0 on the classpath; docker run -d -p 127.0.0.1:5020:5020 oitc/modbus-server:latest):
TagBatch batch = TagBatch.builder()
.withBatchId("repro")
.withConnectionFactory(new DefaultPlcDriverManager())
.withConnectionString("modbus-tcp://127.0.0.1:5020")
.addTagAddress("c1", "coil:1")
.withTrigger(new TimerTrigger(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS))
.withListener(new TagBatchListener() {
@Override
public void onTagsFetched(TagBatch b, PlcReadResponse r) {
System.out.println("fetched " + r.getResponseCode("c1"));
}
@Override
public void onError(TagBatch b, Throwable t) {
System.out.println("error " + t);
}
})
.build();
batch.start();
Thread.sleep(5000);
batch.close();
Output: one fetched OK, then only error ... Transport is closed lines. Replace the factory with PlcConnectionCache.getBuilder().withConnectionFactory(new DefaultPlcDriverManager()).build(), restart the simulator while the batch runs, and the error lines never stop.
Found while porting Apache Camel's camel-plc4x triggered consumer from plc4j-scraper to the event pump (CAMEL-25617).
Version
v1.0.0 (code unchanged on develop as of 2026-10-23)
Programming Languages
- plc4c
- plc4go
- plc4j
- plc4net
- plc4py
Protocols
- Modbus (used for the reproduction; the cause is protocol-independent)
- Lingua principale
- Java
- Stelle
- 1.8k
- Fork
- 512
- Merge medio
- 2g 2h
- PR unite (30g)
- 34
Preparare l'ambiente
- Include un Dockerfile o un file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di apache/plc4x
-
[Bug]: eip.mspec formationApertaEthernet/IP java
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 90/100
apache/plc4x#2733 · 5 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Bug]: [Modbus] Support UDINT with least significant register first (little-endian word order)Aperta
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 52/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 45/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Bug]: OPC-UA driver 1.0.0 fails against a certificate-less server even with security-policy=NONE (regression vs 0.13.1)Forse già presa @splatch l’ha presa 7 giorni fa. Aperta
apache/plc4x#2830 · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Bug]: OPC UA UserNameIdentityToken sends length+password+nonce instead of the plain password when token security policy is NoneForse già presa @splatch l’ha presa 27 giorni fa. ApertaOPC-UA
apache/plc4x#2791 · 2 commenti · 2 assegnatari ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di apache/plc4x
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 67/100
quarkiverse/quarkus-google-cloud-services#1188 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Component: Frontend Component: Web Component Type: Maintenance
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
it-at-m/refarch-templates#1944 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
priority: p2 type: bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
googleapis/java-genai#1372 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 60/100
-
GeoSeries scale and skew tests fail with pytest 9.2.0Forse già presa @jiayuasu l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno