REGRESSION: SanityCheckPlan error for GROUP BY ... HAVING on a CASE key with parquet filter pushdown
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100
Direzione di ricerca
Start with the regression identified by git bisect at 99e723dd47 and trace how EnsureRequirements handles orderings and constants across the ProjectionExec inserted by common subexpression elimination. Reproduce with the SQL in the issue, using parquet filter pushdown; the fix is done when planning succeeds and the query returns e = 'y', count = 1. A linked open pull request already addresses this issue.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Posted by Claude (an AI assistant) on behalf of cetra3.
Describe the bug
With datafusion.execution.parquet.pushdown_filters = true, a query that groups by a CASE expression and pins the group key with HAVING fails to plan with SanityCheckPlan. The CASE repeats a subexpression, so common subexpression elimination adds a ProjectionExec above the scan.
The HAVING filter is pushed into the parquet predicate, which makes the group key constant. The partial AggregateExec relies on that and requires its input ordered by the key. But the ProjectionExec between the scan and the aggregate rewrites a = 'x' to __common_expr_1, and the constant does not survive that projection, so the final plan check rejects the plan.
This plans and returns the right row on 55.2.0.
To Reproduce
datafusion-cli at main (c8265b6872, 2026-11-10):
SET datafusion.execution.parquet.pushdown_filters = true;
COPY (SELECT * FROM (VALUES ('x', 'y'), ('x', 'z'), ('w', 'y')) AS v(a, b)) TO 't.parquet';
CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE t STORED AS PARQUET LOCATION 't.parquet';
SELECT CASE WHEN a = 'x' AND b = 'y' THEN b WHEN a = 'x' THEN 'z' END AS e, count(*)
FROM t
GROUP BY e
HAVING e = 'y';
SanityCheckPlan: the plan produced by physical optimizer rule 'EnsureRequirements' does not satisfy the order and distribution requirements
caused by
Error during planning: Plan: ["AggregateExec: mode=Partial, gby=[CASE WHEN __common_expr_1@0 AND b@1 = y THEN b@1 WHEN __common_expr_1@0 THEN z END as CASE WHEN t.a = Utf8(\"x\") AND t.b = Utf8(\"y\") THEN t.b WHEN t.a = Utf8(\"x\") THEN Utf8(\"z\") END], aggr=[count(Int64(1))]", " ProjectionExec: expr=[a@0 = x as __common_expr_1, b@1 as b]", " RepartitionExec: partitioning=RoundRobinBatch(32), input_partitions=1", " DataSourceExec: file_groups={1 group: [[.../t.parquet]]}, projection=[a, b], file_type=parquet, predicate=CASE WHEN a@0 = x AND b@1 = y THEN b@1 WHEN a@0 = x THEN z END = y"] does not satisfy order requirements: [CASE WHEN __common_expr_1@0 AND b@1 = y THEN b@1 WHEN __common_expr_1@0 THEN z END ASC]. Child-0 order: []
Expected behavior
One row, e = 'y', count = 1, as 55.2.0 returns.
Additional context
git bisectbetween 55.2.0's merge base withmainandmainpoints at 99e723dd47, "fix: retain only valid orderings after order-preserving repartition" (#26747). Its parent ce0e8293f9 returns the right row.- It also fails with
target_partitions = 1. - Each of these makes it plan and return the right row:
pushdown_filters = false.- An in-memory table (
CREATE TABLE t AS VALUES ...) in place of parquet. - A
CASEwith no repeated subexpression, so CSE adds no projection, for exampleCASE WHEN a = 'x' THEN b ELSE 'z' END. WHERE <the same CASE> = 'y' ... ORDER BY ewith noGROUP BY.
- This looks related to #26624 (fixed by #27123), where a constant was lost when equivalence properties were projected through a sort-merge join. That fix is in
main, and this query still fails. The open PR #27191 does not fix it either. I built its head (434a1272bb) and got the same error.
- Lingua principale
- Rust
- Stelle
- 9.6k
- Fork
- 2.6k
- Merge medio
- 3g 4h
- PR unite (30g)
- 345
Preparare l'ambiente
Avvia il container di sviluppo del progetto nel browser, con il tuo account GitHub.
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di apache/datafusion
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
apache/datafusion#27315 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
apache/datafusion#27094 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Substrait consumer doesn't recognise `shift_left` / `shift_right` from functions_arithmetic.yamlForse già presa @jonasHanhan l’ha presa 9 giorni fa. Apertabug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
apache/datafusion#27059 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
`ProjectionExprs::project_statistics` computes approximate `Statistics::total_byte_size` ignoring column statsForse già presa @joseph-isaacs l’ha presa 10 giorni fa. Apertabug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
apache/datafusion#27050 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
physical-plan: decoding an Unnest or Explain node with an unset field panicsForse già presa @geoHeil l’ha presa 8 giorni fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
apache/datafusion#26999 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di apache/datafusion
Issue simili
-
P3
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
HerringtonDarkholme/hd-lang#1770 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
jonathanong/no-mistakes#3332 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
swc-project/swc-next-issues#310 ·
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
swc-project/swc-ai-issues#653 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
lbjlaq/Antigravity-Manager#3937 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno