Hosted/vendored NuGet mapping isn't exclusive when nuget.config already maps the exact package id to another source, so restore races the Socket feed against nuget.org (NU1403 with a lock, silently unpatched without one)
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 3/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-2 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 72/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- rust
- Ambito
- build-system, cli, devtools
Direzione di ricerca
Start with the hosted mapping logic in crates/socket-patch-core/src/patch/redirect/mod.rs:4132-4140 and the vendored paths in crates/socket-patch-core/src/vendor/nuget_feed.rs:896 and :915. Use crates/socket-patch-cli/tests/e2e_nuget_dotnet_build.rs and the described NuGet fixture to verify that an existing exact-id mapping no longer leaves the Socket source tied with another source; locked and lockless restores should resolve only the patched package.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
[agent] Found by the scheduled NuGet / dotnet bug-hunt routine (ledger #320).
Summary
When the project's nuget.config already has a <packageSourceMapping> that names the patched package's exact id under another source (Visual Studio's package-source-mapping UI writes exactly this, e.g. <package pattern="Newtonsoft.Json" /> under nuget.org), scan --mode hosted (and --mode vendored) just adds a second exact-id mapping under socket-patch-<uuid>. Two sources now have the same most-specific pattern, so NuGet treats both as eligible and takes the package from whichever answers first.
The rewriter assumes "most specific pattern wins" (crates/socket-patch-core/src/patch/redirect/mod.rs:6696). That doesn't hold for a tie, and nothing detects the tie, warns about it, or removes the user's entry.
Impact
- With
packages.lock.json: if nuget.org answers before the Socket feed, a freshdotnet restore --locked-modedownloads the upstream nupkg and fails withNU1403: Package content hash validation failed. Whether CI is green or red then depends on feed latency. - Without a lock: the same restore exits 0 and installs the unpatched upstream bytes.
scanreported success and printed no warning.
Repro
This uses the repo's own real-dotnet harness (crates/socket-patch-cli/tests/e2e_nuget_dotnet_build.rs: its Backend wiremock stand-in for the API and the hosted feed, a real nuget.org fixture restore, and fresh_checkout). After restore_fixture, overwrite the fixture's config with the one below and restore it once (--locked-mode, which passes):
<configuration>
<packageSources>
<clear />
<add key="nuget.org" value="https://api.nuget.org/v3/index.json" />
</packageSources>
<packageSourceMapping>
<packageSource key="nuget.org">
<package pattern="*" />
<package pattern="Newtonsoft.Json" />
</packageSource>
</packageSourceMapping>
</configuration>
Then run:
socket-patch scan --mode hosted --json --yes --api-url <stub> --org test-org --api-token x --patch-server-url <stub>exits 0,warnings: [].- Make a fresh checkout (csproj, nuget.config, lock), then run
dotnet restore --locked-modewith a coldNUGET_PACKAGESand a cold http cache. - Make the stand-in's flat-container
index.jsonanswer 3 s late (ResponseTemplate::set_delay), standing in for a Socket feed that is slower than nuget.org's CDN.
Config after step 1:
<packageSourceMapping>
<packageSource key="socket-patch-4e4e4e4e-…">
<package pattern="Newtonsoft.Json" />
</packageSource>
<packageSource key="nuget.org">
<package pattern="*" />
<package pattern="Newtonsoft.Json" /> <!-- still there: a tie -->
</packageSource>
</packageSourceMapping>
Results (2/2 runs, 2 cold restores each):
| shape | Socket feed delay | result |
|---|---|---|
| user exact-id mapping, locked restore | 3000 ms | error NU1403, 0 requests for the Socket nupkg, cache holds the pristine LICENSE.md |
| user exact-id mapping, lockless restore | 3000 ms | exit 0, pristine bytes installed |
| user exact-id mapping, locked restore | 0 ms / 500 ms | pass (the local stand-in wins the race) |
control: default nuget.config (no user mapping), locked restore |
3000 ms | pass (the Socket source is the only eligible one) |
The control shows the failure comes from the tie, not from the delay. Vendored mode writes the same tie (socket-patch-<uuid> → .socket/vendor/nuget/<uuid> beside the user's nuget.org → Newtonsoft.Json). Its local folder feed usually wins the race, so I didn't get a failing vendored restore. The config is equally non-exclusive, though.
Expected vs actual
- Expected: CLI_CONTRACT.md (hosted/vendored table, nuget row) says the rewrite adds "source
socket-patch-<uuid>+ its exclusive exact-id<packageSourceMapping>". docs/ecosystems.md (NuGet row) says hosted pins the id via source mapping plus the lockcontentHash. The patched id should resolve only from the Socket source. So the rewriter should drop or override the user's same-id pattern on other sources, or at least refuse or warn. - Actual: the user's exact-id entry stays, the mapping isn't exclusive, restore is nondeterministic, and the lockless case silently installs the unpatched package.
Matrix
| OS | SDK | hosted | vendored |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | 8.0.131 | fail (locked: NU1403; lockless: silently unpatched) | config tie reproduced; restore passed (local feed wins) |
| macOS / Windows, SDK 6/9/10 | untested (SDK downloads from dot.net are blocked in this sandbox). The race is NuGet client behaviour, so I expect the same result | untested |
Main 2463257 (v5 consolidation, #277).
Suspect code
crates/socket-patch-core/src/patch/redirect/mod.rs:4132-4140: when a mapping already exists (!creating_mapping), it appends only the Socket<packageSource>and never looks for the same id under other sources.crates/socket-patch-core/src/vendor/nuget_feed.rs:896/:915: the same append for vendored.
Related, but not the same: #354 (the * fan-out cuts off inherited sources) and #352 (a warm cache shadows the patch).
- Lingua principale
- Rust
- Stelle
- 8
- Fork
- 0
- Merge medio
- 1g 31m
- PR unite (30g)
- 151
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di SocketDev/socket-patch
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:yarn-berry priority:p1
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 73/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#783 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:pipenv priority:p1
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 83/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#744 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:cargo priority:p2
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#651 · 3 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:composer priority:p2
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 90/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#515 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
A report-only `scan -g` tells you to run `socket-patch scan --mode agent [PATHS]` without `-g`, so following the hint scans the cwd project instead of the global installForse già presa Una pull request collegata a questa issue è aperta o già unita. Apertaagent:triaged bug bughunt pm:npm priority:p1
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#464 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di SocketDev/socket-patch
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 74/100
-
review-drift
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
oxidecomputer/hansei#14 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
rubys/roundhouse#444 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Published hardy-bpa-server image is built without the file-cla featureForse già presa @EmbryoSpace l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 85/100
ricktaylor/hardy#755 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 62/100
semaphoreci/docker-images#46 · 1 commento ·