Hosted/vendored NuGet mapping isn't exclusive when nuget.config already maps the exact package id to another source, so restore races the Socket feed against nuget.org (NU1403 with a lock, silently unpatched without one)
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 3/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-2 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 72/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- rust
- Área
- build-system, cli, devtools
Línea de trabajo
Start with the hosted mapping logic in crates/socket-patch-core/src/patch/redirect/mod.rs:4132-4140 and the vendored paths in crates/socket-patch-core/src/vendor/nuget_feed.rs:896 and :915. Use crates/socket-patch-cli/tests/e2e_nuget_dotnet_build.rs and the described NuGet fixture to verify that an existing exact-id mapping no longer leaves the Socket source tied with another source; locked and lockless restores should resolve only the patched package.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
[agent] Found by the scheduled NuGet / dotnet bug-hunt routine (ledger #320).
Summary
When the project's nuget.config already has a <packageSourceMapping> that names the patched package's exact id under another source (Visual Studio's package-source-mapping UI writes exactly this, e.g. <package pattern="Newtonsoft.Json" /> under nuget.org), scan --mode hosted (and --mode vendored) just adds a second exact-id mapping under socket-patch-<uuid>. Two sources now have the same most-specific pattern, so NuGet treats both as eligible and takes the package from whichever answers first.
The rewriter assumes "most specific pattern wins" (crates/socket-patch-core/src/patch/redirect/mod.rs:6696). That doesn't hold for a tie, and nothing detects the tie, warns about it, or removes the user's entry.
Impact
- With
packages.lock.json: if nuget.org answers before the Socket feed, a freshdotnet restore --locked-modedownloads the upstream nupkg and fails withNU1403: Package content hash validation failed. Whether CI is green or red then depends on feed latency. - Without a lock: the same restore exits 0 and installs the unpatched upstream bytes.
scanreported success and printed no warning.
Repro
This uses the repo's own real-dotnet harness (crates/socket-patch-cli/tests/e2e_nuget_dotnet_build.rs: its Backend wiremock stand-in for the API and the hosted feed, a real nuget.org fixture restore, and fresh_checkout). After restore_fixture, overwrite the fixture's config with the one below and restore it once (--locked-mode, which passes):
<configuration>
<packageSources>
<clear />
<add key="nuget.org" value="https://api.nuget.org/v3/index.json" />
</packageSources>
<packageSourceMapping>
<packageSource key="nuget.org">
<package pattern="*" />
<package pattern="Newtonsoft.Json" />
</packageSource>
</packageSourceMapping>
</configuration>
Then run:
socket-patch scan --mode hosted --json --yes --api-url <stub> --org test-org --api-token x --patch-server-url <stub>exits 0,warnings: [].- Make a fresh checkout (csproj, nuget.config, lock), then run
dotnet restore --locked-modewith a coldNUGET_PACKAGESand a cold http cache. - Make the stand-in's flat-container
index.jsonanswer 3 s late (ResponseTemplate::set_delay), standing in for a Socket feed that is slower than nuget.org's CDN.
Config after step 1:
<packageSourceMapping>
<packageSource key="socket-patch-4e4e4e4e-…">
<package pattern="Newtonsoft.Json" />
</packageSource>
<packageSource key="nuget.org">
<package pattern="*" />
<package pattern="Newtonsoft.Json" /> <!-- still there: a tie -->
</packageSource>
</packageSourceMapping>
Results (2/2 runs, 2 cold restores each):
| shape | Socket feed delay | result |
|---|---|---|
| user exact-id mapping, locked restore | 3000 ms | error NU1403, 0 requests for the Socket nupkg, cache holds the pristine LICENSE.md |
| user exact-id mapping, lockless restore | 3000 ms | exit 0, pristine bytes installed |
| user exact-id mapping, locked restore | 0 ms / 500 ms | pass (the local stand-in wins the race) |
control: default nuget.config (no user mapping), locked restore |
3000 ms | pass (the Socket source is the only eligible one) |
The control shows the failure comes from the tie, not from the delay. Vendored mode writes the same tie (socket-patch-<uuid> → .socket/vendor/nuget/<uuid> beside the user's nuget.org → Newtonsoft.Json). Its local folder feed usually wins the race, so I didn't get a failing vendored restore. The config is equally non-exclusive, though.
Expected vs actual
- Expected: CLI_CONTRACT.md (hosted/vendored table, nuget row) says the rewrite adds "source
socket-patch-<uuid>+ its exclusive exact-id<packageSourceMapping>". docs/ecosystems.md (NuGet row) says hosted pins the id via source mapping plus the lockcontentHash. The patched id should resolve only from the Socket source. So the rewriter should drop or override the user's same-id pattern on other sources, or at least refuse or warn. - Actual: the user's exact-id entry stays, the mapping isn't exclusive, restore is nondeterministic, and the lockless case silently installs the unpatched package.
Matrix
| OS | SDK | hosted | vendored |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | 8.0.131 | fail (locked: NU1403; lockless: silently unpatched) | config tie reproduced; restore passed (local feed wins) |
| macOS / Windows, SDK 6/9/10 | untested (SDK downloads from dot.net are blocked in this sandbox). The race is NuGet client behaviour, so I expect the same result | untested |
Main 2463257 (v5 consolidation, #277).
Suspect code
crates/socket-patch-core/src/patch/redirect/mod.rs:4132-4140: when a mapping already exists (!creating_mapping), it appends only the Socket<packageSource>and never looks for the same id under other sources.crates/socket-patch-core/src/vendor/nuget_feed.rs:896/:915: the same append for vendored.
Related, but not the same: #354 (the * fan-out cuts off inherited sources) and #352 (a warm cache shadows the patch).
- Lenguaje dominante
- Rust
- Estrellas
- 8
- Forks
- 0
- Merge medio
- 1 d 31 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 151
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de SocketDev/socket-patch
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:yarn-berry priority:p1
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 73/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#783 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:pipenv priority:p1
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 83/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#744 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:cargo priority:p2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#651 · 3 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:composer priority:p2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#515 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
A report-only `scan -g` tells you to run `socket-patch scan --mode agent [PATHS]` without `-g`, so following the hint scans the cwd project instead of the global installPosiblemente ocupada Un pull request vinculado a esta issue está abierto o ya se fusionó. Abiertoagent:triaged bug bughunt pm:npm priority:p1
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#464 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de SocketDev/socket-patch
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
-
review-drift
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
oxidecomputer/hansei#14 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
rubys/roundhouse#444 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Published hardy-bpa-server image is built without the file-cla featurePosiblemente ocupada @EmbryoSpace la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
ricktaylor/hardy#755 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
semaphoreci/docker-images#46 · 1 comentario ·