Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

Evaluation: Add latency summary data

Aperta
  • Qualcosa non va?
#1,253 0 commenti 0 reazioni 1 assegnatario Vedi su GitHub

I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni

@Ayush8923 ci sta già lavorando.

Dal 14/10/2026.

  • #1252 di @Ayush8923 — aperta

Valutazione

Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.

Descrizione

Is your feature request related to a problem?
Evaluation runs provide cost information for OpenAI calls but lack latency data. This prevents us from identifying which configurations or prompts are slower, impacting our ability to optimize evaluations effectively.

Describe the solution you'd like
Add a latency summary to each evaluation run next to the cost, including:

  • Average time of OpenAI calls in milliseconds, plus the number of calls for each step:
    • response: generating the answer
    • embedding: similarity scoring (v1 runs)
    • judge: LLM-as-judge scoring (v2 runs)
  • One overall average across all successful calls.
  • Display this data on existing run endpoints for frontend integration.
  • Ensure runs complete even if latency calculation fails.
Original issue

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Evaluation runs show how much the OpenAI calls cost, but not how long they took. When we compare configs or prompts, we can't tell whether one setup is slower than another, or which step of the evaluation is slow: generating answers, embeddings, or judging. Response time is one of the main reasons fast evaluations exist, but we don't report it anywhere.

Describe the solution you'd like
Add a latency summary to each evaluation run, next to the existing cost:

  • The average time of an OpenAI call in milliseconds, plus the number of calls, for each step:
    • response: generating the answer for each question
    • embedding: similarity scoring (v1 runs)
    • judge: LLM-as-judge scoring (v2 runs)
  • One overall average across all calls in the run.
  • Only successful calls count. Failed calls and questions blocked by a guardrail are left out.
  • Shown on the existing run endpoints, so the frontend can display it on the run card next to cost.
  • If working out latency fails, the run should still complete.

Describe alternatives you've considered

  • Storing latency inside the cost field. Rejected: a problem with one could wipe out the other. Keeping them separate keeps them independent.
  • Using the total batch duration for batch runs. Rejected: batch time is mostly OpenAI queue time, not call time, so it would be misleading. Batch runs will show no latency.
  • Adding p95 / max / per-question latency now. Deferred: we'll start with averages. The call counts and per-question timings are stored so these can be added later.
Lingua principale
Python
Stelle
18
Fork
11
Merge medio
4g 20h
PR unite (30g)
9

Preparare l'ambiente

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di ProjectTech4DevAI/kaapi-backend

Tutte le issue di ProjectTech4DevAI/kaapi-backend

Issue simili

Altre issue su Python

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.