Minor spelling and grammar corrections in README
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 1/5
- Tempo stimato
- Meno di un'ora
- Idoneità per principianti
- 38/100
- Tipo di issue
- Documentazione
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Ferma
- Stack tecnologico
- powershell
- Ambito
- documentation
Direzione di ricerca
The requested edits are in README.md at lines 5 and 9. Read the surrounding README text, make the two spelling and wording corrections described in the issue, and check that both passages match the proposed versions.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Prerequisites
- Write a descriptive title.
- Make sure you are able to repro it on the latest version
- Search the existing issues.
Steps to reproduce
This fixes minor spelling/grammar mistakes in the README and has no effect on the functionality.
Line 5
Current
There is no throttling mechanism and so all jobs are started immediately and are all run currently.
The intended word here is 'concurrently'. The distinction is important because concurrent operations is the purpose of this module.
Proposed
There is no throttling mechanism and so all jobs are started immediately and are all run concurrently.
Line 9
Current
ThreadJob jobs will tend to run much faster because there is lower overhead and they do not use the remoting serialization system as BackgroundJob jobs do. And they will use up fewer system resources.
This snippet can be reworded for clarity and to fix a minor issue with parallel structure.
Proposed
ThreadJob jobs will tend to run much faster because there is lower overhead and they do not use the remoting serialization system as BackgroundJob jobs do. Additionally, they consume fewer system resources.
Expected behavior
Line 5:
> There is no throttling mechanism and so all jobs are started immediately and are all run concurrently.
Line 9:
> ThreadJob jobs will tend to run much faster because there is lower overhead and they do not use the remoting serialization system as BackgroundJob jobs do. Additionally, they consume fewer system resources.
Actual behavior
Line 5:
> There is no throttling mechanism and so all jobs are started immediately and are all run currently.
The intended word here is 'concurrently'. The distinction is important because _concurrent_ operations is the purpose of this module.
Line 9:
> ThreadJob jobs will tend to run much faster because there is lower overhead and they do not use the remoting serialization system as BackgroundJob jobs do. And they will use up fewer system resources.
This snippet can be reworded for clarity and to fix a minor issue with parallel structure.
Error details
N/A
Environment data
N/A
Version
2.0.3
Visuals
No response
- Lingua principale
- PowerShell
- Stelle
- 37
- Fork
- 22
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di PowerShell/ThreadJob
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 48/100
PowerShell/ThreadJob#59 · 1 reazione ·
-
enhancement
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 56/100
PowerShell/ThreadJob#56 · 1 reazione ·
-
Set alias for ThreadJob command(s)Forse già presa @kilasuit l’ha presa 82 giorni fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 20/100
PowerShell/ThreadJob#45 · 1 commento ·
-
Difficoltà 1/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 48/100
PowerShell/ThreadJob#44 ·
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 35/100
PowerShell/ThreadJob#43 ·
Tutte le issue di PowerShell/ThreadJob
Issue simili
-
documentation
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec#275 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[doc-healer] DDUw improvement: retry integrity-filtered issue reads with direct single-item lookupsApertaautomation documentation
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
documentation good first issue priority: low size: XS
Difficoltà 1/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 92/100
yeongseon/azure-functions-doctor-python#651 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 1/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
Infisical/infisical#8987 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 73/100
lichess-org/lila#22298 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno