Minor spelling and grammar corrections in README
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 1/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Menos de una hora
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 38/100
- Tipo de issue
- Documentación
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Stack tecnológico
- powershell
- Área
- documentation
Línea de trabajo
The requested edits are in README.md at lines 5 and 9. Read the surrounding README text, make the two spelling and wording corrections described in the issue, and check that both passages match the proposed versions.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Prerequisites
- Write a descriptive title.
- Make sure you are able to repro it on the latest version
- Search the existing issues.
Steps to reproduce
This fixes minor spelling/grammar mistakes in the README and has no effect on the functionality.
Line 5
Current
There is no throttling mechanism and so all jobs are started immediately and are all run currently.
The intended word here is 'concurrently'. The distinction is important because concurrent operations is the purpose of this module.
Proposed
There is no throttling mechanism and so all jobs are started immediately and are all run concurrently.
Line 9
Current
ThreadJob jobs will tend to run much faster because there is lower overhead and they do not use the remoting serialization system as BackgroundJob jobs do. And they will use up fewer system resources.
This snippet can be reworded for clarity and to fix a minor issue with parallel structure.
Proposed
ThreadJob jobs will tend to run much faster because there is lower overhead and they do not use the remoting serialization system as BackgroundJob jobs do. Additionally, they consume fewer system resources.
Expected behavior
Line 5:
> There is no throttling mechanism and so all jobs are started immediately and are all run concurrently.
Line 9:
> ThreadJob jobs will tend to run much faster because there is lower overhead and they do not use the remoting serialization system as BackgroundJob jobs do. Additionally, they consume fewer system resources.
Actual behavior
Line 5:
> There is no throttling mechanism and so all jobs are started immediately and are all run currently.
The intended word here is 'concurrently'. The distinction is important because _concurrent_ operations is the purpose of this module.
Line 9:
> ThreadJob jobs will tend to run much faster because there is lower overhead and they do not use the remoting serialization system as BackgroundJob jobs do. And they will use up fewer system resources.
This snippet can be reworded for clarity and to fix a minor issue with parallel structure.
Error details
N/A
Environment data
N/A
Version
2.0.3
Visuals
No response
- Lenguaje dominante
- PowerShell
- Estrellas
- 37
- Forks
- 22
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de PowerShell/ThreadJob
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
PowerShell/ThreadJob#59 · 1 reacción ·
-
enhancement
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 56/100
PowerShell/ThreadJob#56 · 1 reacción ·
-
Set alias for ThreadJob command(s)Posiblemente ocupada @kilasuit la tomó hace 82 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 20/100
PowerShell/ThreadJob#45 · 1 comentario ·
-
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
PowerShell/ThreadJob#44 ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
PowerShell/ThreadJob#43 ·
Todos los issues de PowerShell/ThreadJob
Issues similares
-
documentation
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec#275 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[doc-healer] DDUw improvement: retry integrity-filtered issue reads with direct single-item lookupsAbiertoautomation documentation
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
documentation good first issue priority: low size: XS
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 92/100
yeongseon/azure-functions-doctor-python#651 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Infisical/infisical#8987 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 73/100
lichess-org/lila#22298 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día