Add auth on games
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 18/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Ferma
- Stack tecnologico
- typescript
- Ambito
- authentication, backend-api-design, full-stack
Direzione di ricerca
Start by reading apps/client/src/server.ts, then trace how the website fetches the manifest and environment in apps/website/src/manifest.ts and apps/website/src/env.ts. The issue proposes authentication across the client and website, with game server identity as a possible follow-up; agree on scope and flow before implementation. Done means configured users are authenticated and access rules protect game files, while unauthenticated behavior remains unchanged when auth is disabled.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Which app is this feature request for?
other
Feature
Involves client, website and server.
The loader has no access control. Anyone who can reach the client URL can load the game:
- The client serves
/manifest,/envand/game/*with no authentication (server.ts#L87, #L100, #L112). /envreturns everyNANOFORGE_*environment variable, prefix stripped (env.ts#L1-L8).- The website (
apps/website) fetches the manifest and downloads every game file into OPFS without identifying the user. - The game server (
apps/server) forks the game'smain.jsand never learns who the connecting players are.
So developers can't:
- limit a game to certain users (closed beta, paid access, internal testers);
- reuse an existing identity provider (Google, GitHub, Discord, Keycloak, a studio's own SSO, etc.);
- get a trusted user identity inside the game or on the game server.
The goal: an optional authentication step in the loader, configured by the developer, that checks the user through SSO / OAuth2 before any game file is served and denies everyone else. When nothing is configured, behavior stays exactly as it is today.
Ideal solution or implementation
Support OpenID Connect / OAuth2 (Authorization Code + PKCE) with any provider, configured through CLI options or environment variables.
Phase 1: client (apps/client)
- Options, for example:
Custom (non-OIDC) OAuth2 providers could be supported by setting the authorize, token and userinfo URLs explicitly.--auth-issuer <url> OIDC issuer (discovery via /.well-known/openid-configuration) --auth-client-id <id> --auth-client-secret <secret> (optional, confidential clients) --auth-scopes <scopes> default: "openid profile email" --auth-allow <rule> allowed emails / domains / groups / roles claim - Routes
/auth/login(redirects to the provider),/auth/callback(exchanges the code, validates the ID token),/auth/logoutand/auth/me. - Session stored in an
HttpOnly,Secure,SameSitecookie (signed or encrypted). - Route guard on
/manifest,/envand/game/*:401without a valid session,403if the user doesn't match--auth-allow. The website shell (/, static assets) stays public so it can show a login screen. - Allow rule checked on the server side (claims, email domain, group or role membership), plus a hook for custom rules (e.g. a function exported from the game directory, or a webhook).
- Auth secrets never appear in
/env(another prefix thanNANOFORGE_, or filtered out). - With no auth option set, the client behaves as today (test).
Phase 2: website (apps/website)
- On
401from/manifestor/env: a "Sign in" screen that redirects to/auth/login. On403: an "Access denied" screen. - The authenticated user's identity (id, name, email, claims) is available to the game, e.g. through
IGameOptionsor next to the env. - The OPFS game cache is cleared or scoped per user on logout, so files downloaded by one user aren't reused by another user on the same browser.
Phase 3: game server (apps/server)
- The website passes a short-lived access token or ID token to the game server when it connects.
- A helper checks that token against the same issuer (JWKS), so the game server can trust player identities.
Auth requirements for every phase: state and nonce parameters, PKCE, token signature checked against JWKS, a redirect URI allowlist, client secrets kept out of /env, HTTPS in production (the client already supports --cert / --key, server.ts#L24-L25).
Alternative solutions or implementations
- Basic auth or a shared access key (
--password,NANOFORGE_ACCESS_KEY): very easy to build, and enough for private previews. But there are no per-user identities, and revoking one person's access isn't possible. - Delegating auth to a reverse proxy (oauth2-proxy, Cloudflare Access, Authelia): works today with no code changes. But it has to be set up outside NanoForge, and the game never receives the user's identity. It would still help to document it as the "no built-in auth" option.
- Custom SSO only through a plugin/hook API: the loader calls a function supplied by the developer to authorize each request. Flexible, but every developer would have to write their own OAuth flow.
Other context
- Relevant files:
apps/client/src/server.ts(routes),apps/client/src/env.ts,apps/website/src/manifest.ts,apps/website/src/env.ts,apps/website/src/cache/cache.ts,apps/website/src/types/game.type.ts,apps/server/src/server.ts. - The per-file game cache this issue referred to is done (#121, merged). The cached files still have to be scoped per user or invalidated when the user changes (phase 2).
Open questions (not recorded, ask the team):
- Is phase 3 (game server) part of this issue, or a follow-up issue?
- Configuration through CLI options, environment variables, or both? And how does
nf startpass them to the client? - Which custom-rule hook: a function from the game directory, a webhook, or none at first?
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 1
- Fork
- 0
- Merge medio
- 17h 25m
- PR unite (30g)
- 11
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di NanoForge-dev/Loader
-
app:client app:website enhancement refactor
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
NanoForge-dev/Loader#145 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
chore(loader-client,loader-server): package.json entry points name files the build does not produceApertaapp:client app:server bug chore good first issue
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
NanoForge-dev/Loader#144 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
app:website bug good first issue
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 85/100
NanoForge-dev/Loader#141 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
app:website bug good first issue
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
NanoForge-dev/Loader#140 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
app:server bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 85/100
NanoForge-dev/Loader#138 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di NanoForge-dev/Loader
Issue simili
-
Mend: dependency security vulnerability
Difficoltà 1/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
fdm-monster/fdm-monster#5563 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
be-BOP-io-SA/be-BOP#2849 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 79/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
1️⃣ phase/under-investigation flaky/confirmed flaky/needs-decision type/bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
growilabs/growi#12246 · 3 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
🐛 The Rulekeeper - An index run that gives up on the lock ends SucceededForse già presa @github-actions l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
SSWConsulting/SSW.Rules#2809 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno