a failed landing with its work kept asks forever, long after nothing is waiting on the answer
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 42/100
Direzione di ricerca
Start at internal/session/task_status.go:441 and trace how TaskFailed with Held facts becomes ProjectTask status and contributes to needs you. Compare the recorded later nodes, branch existence, and continuation evidence to decide when the conversation has moved past a held landing. Done means the card retains its branch and offer while no longer marking or counting a non-blocking demand.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
What happens
A task that ends failed with its work still held keeps wearing your call and keeps counting toward needs you, for the rest of the session, with no way to reach zero except answering each one.
internal/session/task_status.go:441:
case TaskFailed:
if facts.Held {
// THE ANSWER IS STILL THERE AND SOMEBODY MAY STILL WANT IT...
status.Presence, status.On = TaskPresenceNeedsLook, TaskWaitPerson
return status
}
The offer is real — the branch is on disk and taking it anyway is a genuine answer. The problem is that the offer never expires.
What it looks like
One session, 23 nodes. Four rows stand in needs you, all state=failed, ending=refused, merge=aborted, each with a kept branch that exists:
| node | title | branch |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Skills: five-part record and store serving | task/skills-five-part-record-and-stor-… |
| 6 | Skills: chat shelf and use_skill tool | task/skills-chat-shelf-and-use-skill-… |
| 7 | Store skill fact fields | task/store-skill-fact-fields-… |
| 15 | File GitHub issue: standing firing sees empty task board | task/file-github-issue-standing-firin-… |
By the time they were read, the conversation had moved two tranches past them: a later node had already landed a continuation of the same store-record branch, none of the four branches had ever been pushed, and nothing in flight was waiting on any of them. The count said four people-shaped questions. Zero of them were blocking anything.
Why it is wrong
A mark exists only when a person's answer is the one thing unblocking the work. A card may keep showing a state; a mark must not. A mark is a demand and a card is a status. Four standing demands that unblock nothing train a person to stop reading the count, which costs the marks that do matter.
Shape of the fix
A held landing is a question while the conversation is still on it, and a status afterwards. When the work has been superseded, or the session has moved past it, the row keeps its branch and its offer on the card and stops wearing the mark and stops counting toward needs you.
Open question for whoever takes it: what "moved past it" should be measured against. Candidates seen here — a later node that landed the same branch, a node whose branch no longer exists, and plain distance in the graph. The first two are facts already on the record; the third is a guess. Pick from the record, not the clock.
Not this
The four rows are not stale state, not a cache, and not a surface drawing something the engine did not say. This was checked: the engine was restarted onto the current build first, the records were read off disk, and the rows are what ProjectTask returns for those facts. The reading is correct. The demand is what is wrong.
- Lingua principale
- Go
- Stelle
- 115
- Fork
- 14
- Merge medio
- 9h 37m
- PR unite (30g)
- 755
Preparare l'ambiente
Non abbiamo ancora controllato i file di configurazione di questo progetto. Parti dal suo README e consulta la nostra guida al primo contributo per i passaggi generali.
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di Agent-Field/CodeAF
-
area:chat bug sev:papercut
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 86/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1592 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
area:headless bug sev:critical
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1566 · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
area:chat feature
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1510 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
area:tests bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1489 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
area:chat bug good first issue sev:papercut
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1470 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di Agent-Field/CodeAF
Issue simili
-
priority: low 🌱 type: enhancement 💅🏼
Difficoltà 2/5 Mezza giornata Idoneità per principianti 84/100
nebari-dev/llm-serving-pack#199 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 3 giorni
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
-
area/helm kind/bug priority/backlog triage/accepted
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
lexfrei/cloudflare-tunnel-gateway-controller#889 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug difficulty: beginner documentation good first issue help wanted localization
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 90/100
wavefnd/wave-platform#140 ·
-
compiler/runtime
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
golang/go#81797 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno