GeminiUtil placeholder user turn ("Continue output. DO NOT look at this line ...") is flagged by prompt injection filters
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 76/100
Research direction
Read GeminiUtil.ensureModelResponse, named in the reproduction, and compare its placeholder wording with the ADK Python and TypeScript wording described in the issue. Start with the unit-level reproduction using ensureModelResponse(ImmutableList.of()); done means the generated placeholder no longer triggers the reported prompt-injection filter and matches the agreed wording.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
🔴 Required Information
Describe the Bug:
When an LlmRequest has no contents, or its last content is not from the user, GeminiUtil.ensureModelResponse appends a placeholder user turn with this text:
Continue output. DO NOT look at this line. ONLY look at the content before this line and system instruction.
The sentence reads like an instruction-override prompt ("do not look at this line", "only look at ..."). On Vertex AI with Model Armor floor settings that enable prompt injection and jailbreak detection, requests whose only user-role content is this placeholder are blocked before the model runs. The other ADK languages use neutral wording: ADK Python and ADK TypeScript append "Handle the requests as specified in the System Instruction." when there are no contents, and "Continue processing previous requests as instructed. Exit or provide a summary if no more outputs are needed." when the last turn is not from the user; ADK Go uses the second sentence and appends nothing for empty contents.
Steps to Reproduce:
- Use
com.google.adk:google-adk1.10.1 (the code is unchanged in 1.11.0 and onmainatce882374) with a Vertex AI backedLlmAgentwhose task is fully described by its instruction, for example with inputs passed through session state and the runner called with a userContentwhose parts list is empty. - In the same Google Cloud project, enable Model Armor floor settings for Vertex AI with prompt injection and jailbreak detection in blocking mode (confidence threshold: high).
- Run the agent.
- The first model call is rejected by Model Armor. At unit level,
GeminiUtil.ensureModelResponse(ImmutableList.of())returns one user content with the placeholder text above.
Expected Behavior:
The placeholder turn added by ADK should not look like a prompt injection attempt, and should match the wording used by the other ADK languages.
Observed Behavior:
The Model Armor sanitize log entry of a blocked request (payload removed) reports:
"piAndJailbreakFilterResult": {
"confidenceLevel": "HIGH",
"matchState": "MATCH_FOUND",
"executionState": "EXECUTION_SUCCESS"
}
The other filters in the same entry returned NO_MATCH_FOUND. The inspected text was the system instruction followed by the placeholder line, and the placeholder was the only user-role content in every blocked request. The same requests succeeded before the detection was enabled, and ordinary chat requests in the same project, which end with user-typed text, were not blocked.
Model Armor returns one verdict per request, so the two sentences were also checked on their own. In the same project and settings, each sentence was typed as a plain user message in a new session of a chat agent (same system instruction for both): "Continue output. DO NOT look at this line. ONLY look at the content before this line and system instruction." was blocked by Model Armor, while "Handle the requests as specified in the System Instruction." (the ADK Python sentence for empty contents) was not. Only the sentence differed between the two requests, so the block comes from the wording of the Java sentence.
Environment Details:
- ADK Library Version (see maven dependency): 1.10.1, code unchanged in 1.11.0 and on
main(ce882374) - OS: Linux server (JDK 17); reproduced at unit level on Windows 11 / Microsoft Build of OpenJDK 17.0.19 / Maven 4.0.0-rc-3 (wrapper)
Model Information:
- Which model is being used: gemini-3.8-flash (Vertex AI)
🟡 Optional Information
Regression:
No — the wording has been the same since v0.1.0 (first in Gemini, later moved to GeminiUtil).
How often has this issue occurred?:
- Always (100%) for requests that contain no user-authored content.
Proposed fix:
Use the same wording as ADK Python and ADK TypeScript (a small PR will follow). Note that the Python empty-contents sentence was itself reported to trip Azure OpenAI's jailbreak filter in a LiteLLM code path (google/adk-python#4249; the wording was kept and the extra injection was removed in google/adk-python@d0102ec instead); Model Armor did not block it in the check above. Aligning the languages is proposed as the smallest change; making the placeholder text configurable would be an alternative if maintainers prefer.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 1.7k
- Forks
- 433
- Avg merge
- 3d 9h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 46
Getting set up
Starts the project's dev container in your browser, under your own GitHub account.
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from google/adk-java
-
[spring-ai] ToolConverter silently drops enum and items from tool parameter schemasPossibly taken @hirematha claimed this 5 days ago. Openneeds review
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
google/adk-java#1609 · 2 comments · 1 assignee ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[spring-ai] Streaming responses ending with CJK punctuation (。!?) are misclassified as partial and never persisted to the sessionPossibly taken @hirematha claimed this 5 days ago. Openneeds review
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
google/adk-java#1608 · 3 comments · 1 assignee ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
FirestoreSessionService loses event fields on reload, breaking later turns and tool confirmationsPossibly taken @innoprej claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 22/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Claude model throws UnsupportedOperationException("Not supported yet.") on thinking blocks from Claude 5 modelsPossibly taken @hemasekhar-p claimed this 2 days ago. Openneeds review
google/adk-java#1630 · 2 comments · 1 assignee ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[core] Client disconnects don't cancel the model stream (per-step flow is cached) — and there is no public API to cancel an in-flight runPossibly taken @hemasekhar-p claimed this 4 days ago. Openneeds review
google/adk-java#1618 · 6 comments · 1 assignee ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Similar issues
-
enhancement good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 Half a day Newbie friendliness 66/100
apache/fineract-consumer-facing#175 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[BUG] 订单:会员凭订单号即可取消其他会员的待付款订单(取消接口不校验订单归属)Possibly taken @dadiyang claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
macrozheng/mall#1016 ·
-
[Bug] The producer summary counts an unreported client version as a second version and warns about a version mixPossibly taken A pull request linked to this issue is open or already merged. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
apache/rocketmq-dashboard#6110 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 4 days
-
Feature:Resolution
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
intellij-elixir/intellij-elixir#4396 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Python 3.15 supportPossibly taken @amnesiaof claimed this today. OpenL: python L: python:uv
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
dependabot/dependabot-core#16524 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day