[workflow-editor] Remove duplicate golden-ticket billing guidance from guidelines.md
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 82/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- github-actions
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Edit .github/workflows/guidelines.md, comparing the detailed golden-ticket statement under "Workshop delivery assumptions" with the duplicate under "Golden-Ticket Workshop Surfaces." Keep the detailed rule and replace the repetition with a one-line reference, then validate the seven dependent workflows with --validate and confirm no lock file content changes.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
[!CAUTION]
Protected files were modified in this change.
This pull request is inrequest_reviewmode and requires explicit human scrutiny before merge.Protected files:
.github/workflows/guidelines.md
What changed
.github/workflows/guidelines.md stated the golden-ticket org/billing provisioning rule twice, nearly verbatim:
- "Workshop delivery assumptions" →
Org and billing are pre-provisioned. - "Golden-Ticket Workshop Surfaces" →
Org provisioning and billing are handled by the golden-ticket system.
Both bullets said the provisioning tooling creates the workshop org, assigns Copilot seats, and covers billing, and that core workshop content should not include org/billing setup steps. Keeping both forces every workflow that imports this shared guidelines file to re-read the same instruction twice.
Fix
Kept the detailed statement in "Workshop delivery assumptions" (the first and more complete occurrence) and shortened the "Golden-Ticket Workshop Surfaces" bullet to a one-line summary that points back to it, instead of repeating the full rule.
File changed
.github/workflows/guidelines.md(one bullet shortened, no behavior change)
Why this is more Skills-like
GitHub Skills lessons state a rule once and reference it, rather than restating full guidance in multiple sections. This keeps the shared guidelines file leaner for every dependent workflow (guidelines-enforcer, side-quest, security-side-quest, workshop-author, workshop-explanatory-diagrams, workshop-skill-activity-author, workshop-ui-screenshots) that reads it, without losing any guidance — the full rule is still stated once, just not twice.
No lock files needed regeneration: guidelines.md is referenced by path (not inlined) in the dependent workflows, so I validated by recompiling all seven dependent workflows with --validate and confirmed no lock file content changed as a result of this edit.
[!WARNING]
Firewall blocked 1 domain
The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:
registry.npmjs.orgTo allow these domains, add them to the
network.allowedlist in your workflow frontmatter:network: allowed: - defaults - "registry.npmjs.org"See Network Configuration for more information.
Generated by ✂️ Workflow Skills Editor · copilot · auto · 54.7 AIC · ⌖ 8.2 AIC · ⊞ 9.5K · ◷
- expires on Oct 4, 2026, 7:42 AM UTC
[!NOTE]
This was originally intended as a pull request, but the git push operation failed.Original error: The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 1
Workflow Run: View run details and download bundle artifact
The bundle file is available in the
agentartifact in the workflow run linked above.
Create the pull request manually
# Download the artifact from the workflow run
gh run download '37106933547' -n agent -D '/tmp/agent-37106933547'
# Resolve the bundle source ref, fetch it into a temporary ref, then create the local branch
bundle_path='/tmp/agent-37106933547/aw-workflow-editor-dedup-golden-ticket-guidelines.bundle'
temp_ref='refs/bundles/create-pr-workflow-editor-dedup-golden-ticket-guidelines-4f616f84ace678f0-9ac95883'
target_ref='refs/heads/workflow-editor/dedup-golden-ticket-guidelines-4f616f84ace678f0'
bundle_source_ref=$(git bundle list-heads "$bundle_path" | awk '$2 ~ /^refs\/heads\// { print $2 }')
if [ -z "$bundle_source_ref" ]; then
bundle_source_ref=$(git bundle list-heads "$bundle_path" | awk '$2 == "HEAD" { print $2 }')
fi
if [ "$(printf '%s\n' "$bundle_source_ref" | sed '/^$/d' | wc -l | tr -d ' ')" != "1" ]; then
echo "Expected exactly one bundle source ref, found: $bundle_source_ref" >&2
exit 1
fi
git fetch "$bundle_path" "${bundle_source_ref}:${temp_ref}"
git update-ref "$target_ref" "$temp_ref"
git checkout 'workflow-editor/dedup-golden-ticket-guidelines-4f616f84ace678f0'
# Ensure the working tree matches the updated branch
git reset --hard
# Remove the temporary bundle ref
git update-ref -d "$temp_ref"
# Push the branch to the target remote
git push 'origin' 'workflow-editor/dedup-golden-ticket-guidelines-4f616f84ace678f0'
# Create the pull request
gh pr create --title '[workflow-editor] Remove duplicate golden-ticket billing guidance from guidelines.md' --base 'main' --head 'workflow-editor/dedup-golden-ticket-guidelines-4f616f84ace678f0' --repo 'githubnext/gh-aw-workshop'
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 51
- Forks
- 23
- Avg merge
- 11h 32m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 22
Getting set up
Starts the project's dev container in your browser, under your own GitHub account.
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- No contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from githubnext/gh-aw-workshop
-
documentation
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4251 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
feedback simulation workshop
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4249 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
agentic-workflows documentation workflow-editor
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4246 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
documentation
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 94/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4244 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
documentation
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4242 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in githubnext/gh-aw-workshop
Similar issues
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
hexlet-codebattle/codebattle#2361 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
micromatch/picomatch#223 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 11 days
-
Upgrade MongoDB Node.js driver to 7.6+ for full MongoDB 9.0 compatibilityPossibly taken @ga262 claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
parse-community/parse-server#10754 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
🐛 bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 66/100
margelo/react-native-vision-camera#4211 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 4 days
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
platformatic/platformatic#5161 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day