[awf-feature-surfacing] Surface model-routing and governance toolset guidance
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 68/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- github-actions
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Start with the stale wording at line 97 of .github/aw/syntax-engine.md, and check it against docs/src/content/docs/reference/model-routing.md, which already states the correct rules. Then add governance to the Available list at line 22 of docs/src/content/docs/reference/github-tools.md, using pkg/workflow/data/github_toolsets_permissions.json for the tool purposes and token permissions. Done when both pages match the schema and that permission map.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Overview
The seven-day AWF spec/compiler review found two user-facing guidance gaps in recently changed capabilities. The compiler and schema accept the behavior, but two discoverable syntax references still give incomplete or incorrect instructions.
Key findings
- P2 — Model routing syntax:
.github/aw/syntax-engine.mdsaysengine.model-routing.allowed-modelsis required and implies it limits models the routed task may call. Since #68495, it is an optional router candidate list (AWF v0.28.33+); onlymodels.allowedandmodels.blockedset the request policy. The same syntax entry omits theengine.model-provider: githubrequirement for routed Claude and Codex workflows enforced by #68080. - P2 — GitHub governance toolset: The
tools.github.toolsetsschema acceptsgovernanceafter #67738, and.github/aw/syntax-tools-imports.mdlists it, but the Available list indocs/src/content/docs/reference/github-tools.mdomits it. The reference also lacks a short explanation of its custom property and ruleset tools and token permissions.
Evidence and current surfacing
pkg/parser/schemas/main_workflow_schema.jsonhasengine.model-routingrequired fieldsgoalandmodeonly, and describesallowed-modelsas optional router candidates. It includesgovernanceingithub_toolset_name.pkg/workflow/model_routing.goapplies routing policy and provider validation;pkg/workflow/data/github_toolsets_permissions.jsonmapsgovernanceto custom property and ruleset tools and their permission needs.docs/src/content/docs/reference/model-routing.mdcorrectly explains optional candidates, the AWF version boundary, request policy, and the GitHub provider requirement.docs/src/content/docs/reference/frontmatter.mdalso describes the candidate/policy distinction..github/aw/syntax-engine.md:97retains the stale required-field and request-limit wording.docs/src/content/docs/reference/github-tools.md:22has the incomplete toolset list.- Relevant changes: #68495 (
63e2c65) and #68080 (70f8448) for routing; #67738 for GitHub MCP toolsets.
Next actions
- P2: Update
.github/aw/syntax-engine.mdto callallowed-modelsoptional for AWF v0.28.33+, describe it as router candidates only, and point readers tomodels.allowed/models.blockedfor request policy. State that routed Claude and Codex must resolveengine.model-providertogithub. - P2: Update the GitHub tools reference's available-toolsets list and add a compact
governanceexample with the tool purposes and required token permissions, using the permission map as the source.
Generated by 🧭 Daily AWF Spec Compiler Surfacing Review · codex · gpt60 · 127.8 AIC · ⌖ 5.96 AIC · ⊞ 14.1K · ◷
- expires on Oct 20, 2026, 2:27 PM UTC-08:00
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 5.4k
- Forks
- 576
- Avg merge
- 7h 21m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 816
Getting set up
Starts the project's dev container in your browser, under your own GitHub account.
- Ships a Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from github/gh-aw
-
ai-inspected
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
automation models
Difficulty 3/5 Half a day Newbie friendliness 22/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
agentic-workflows
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 12/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
agentic-workflows
Difficulty 4/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 12/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
agentic-workflows
Difficulty 3/5 Half a day Newbie friendliness 25/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Similar issues
-
Action Required: Fix Renovate ConfigurationPossibly taken @thompson-tomo claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 78/100
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector#16170 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
state:triage-needed
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 80/100
puppe1990/amarra-cais#342 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
replay: a run cancelled during environment setup is logged as an ERROR (Instrument drops the cancellation)Possibly taken A pull request linked to this issue is open or already merged. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day