Hacktoberfest 2026 : les issues que les mainteneurs ont marquées pour octobre, ouvertes et accessibles aux débutants. Parcourir les issues Hacktoberfest

[Task][RFC]: Deliver Goal-scoped capability participation and qualified composition

Ouverte
  • Quelque chose ne va pas ?
#5,207 0 commentaires 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub

Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Évaluation

Difficulté
5/5
Temps estimé
Plus d'une semaine
Accessibilité débutants
25/100
Type d'issue
Fonctionnalité
Clarté
Plutôt claire
Activité
Active
Stack technique
python
Domaine
ai-infra-agents, backend

Piste de recherche

Read the canonical RFC, especially §11, then review the linked current owners and PRs before claiming an unowned acceptance gap. Starting points are loopx/capabilities, loopx/control_plane/capabilities, and docs/reference/extensions.md. Done means integrating only the accepted scope and reconciling the delivery checkpoint with the integrated revision, commands, test evidence, and remaining gates; do not treat a merged PR alone as completion.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Description

direction/architecture-evolution

Outcome / 目标

交付 Goal 级能力参与、组合与连接器生命周期。One task tracks this RFC's delivery; keep implementation PRs and milestone evidence here instead of creating a parallel task tree.

Canonical design: RFC. Roadmap: S6/S8, under #4574. Design acceptance is distinct from implementation, live qualification and promotion.

Current boundary

Source audit: main at ce3862e33 (2026-09-28). This is source/PR inspection, not a new test or live-qualification claim.

Catalog, Goal bindings, agent-context hooks and #4813 external-evidence lifecycle exist. The RFC records an inspection slice and explicitly rejects a mandatory second Portfolio opt-in/store for ordinary direct work.

Work remaining

  • Finish source-revision-aware continuity and shared inspection using existing capability configuration and owner receipts.
  • Qualify direct → composed → direct work with real dependencies; add durable adoption state only when a real caller cannot express policy through existing configuration/receipts.
  • Keep connector qualification with its owner and measure utility before autonomous evolution or presets.

Ownership and ongoing work

Current continuity/Decision Context/memory work is already active; #3829 and #5187 are overlapping readback/settings dependencies, not replacements. Follow RFC §11 ordering; M2 is conditional, not prerequisite to every caller.

Contribution route: implementation/integration overlaps active work. Start from the linked current owners/PRs and identify an unowned acceptance gap in a claim comment; do not begin a competing rewrite.

Acceptance

  • Zero/one/independent-capability cases remain direct; feature-off and provider-failure paths preserve existing behavior.
  • Correction, stale receipts, partial failure, unavailable worker and return-to-requester are visible through CLI, packaged frontend and applicable Lark flows.
  • Composition preserves authority and source lineage with measured overhead; no second scheduler or universal planner.
  • Reconcile the RFC's current delivery checkpoint and this issue with the integrated revision, commands, passed/failed/untested evidence and remaining gates. Close the accepted scope only; no claim that a merged PR alone completes the RFC.

Starting points and delivery boundary

Base: latest main. Reuse the existing typed owner and provider boundaries. Include affected CLI/frontend/Lark companions; verify real entrypoints and backend where changed. Preserve existing first-screen review and maintainer merge gates. Public artifacts contain only synthetic/public-safe evidence, no private operational state. This task does not authorize provider promotion, benchmark launches, release/deployment or unrelated protected effects.

Langage dominant
Python
Étoiles
6.2k
Forks
596
Merge moyen
5 h 34 min
PR mergées (30 j)
931

Préparer son environnement

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Autres issues de loopx-project/loopx

Toutes les issues de loopx-project/loopx

Issues similaires

Plus d'issues Python

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.