Hacktoberfest 2026 : les issues que les mainteneurs ont marquées pour octobre, ouvertes et accessibles aux débutants. Parcourir les issues Hacktoberfest

Extend `requireNodeAddon(path)` to support more use-cases

Ouverte
#91 6 commentaires 0 réactions 1 personne assignée Voir sur GitHub

@mani3xis y travaille déjà.

Depuis le 16/5/2025.

  • #104 par @mani3xis — ouverte

Évaluation

Cette issue n'a pas encore été évaluée.

Description

Context

Currently, the requireNodeAddon() function requires only 1 string argument, which was expected to be a relative path to the compiled Node add-on. This worked great for the first few simple PoCs and demos, but it start showing its age and limitations already. In the meantime @kraenhansen in #12 added support for hashing the module paths to solve the issues of name clashes when modules are being packaged, which was later replaced by #32.

Problem statement

  1. The current solution does not support addons, which are imported by specifying just the package name, whose package.json specifies the main field.
  2. Leaking abstraction (exposes implementation details)

Proposed solution

Adding additional parameters to requireNodeAddon() that would enable the platform's add-on loader to resolve the path and try a few of them. My current suggestion is to have requireNodeAddon(requiredPath: string, targetPackageName: string, fromSubpath: string) where:

  • requiredPath is (in most cases) the original relative path passed to the require() call. If this path was not relative (starting with . or ..) then it should be the package name which will be resolved by looking up the main field, making this argument a relative subpath again.
  • packageName should be the name of the package that this add-on is expected to be in. Please note that such package name might be scoped, therefore - for simplicity - I've decided to keep it separated from the subpath.
  • fromSubpath is the relative path (subpath) of the file that issued the call to the require() function. This parameter is needed to resolve the package-relative path where the add-on is supposed to be.
Example use case 1

Somebody in ./src/index.js within package @callstack/foo wrote:

const module = require('./build/Release/foo.node');

Our Babel plugin should replace it with following:

const module = requireNodeAddon('./build/Release/foo.node', '@callstack/foo', './src/index.js');

In this case, the native loader would be able to resolve the relative path by combining ./build/Release/foo.node on top of ./src/index.js, resulting in ./src/build/Release/foo.node - which should be added to the search paths.

[!NOTE]
If the path would include the package name (especially when it's scoped), like @callstack/foo/src/build/Release/foo.node, then separating the package name from the subpath would be a little bit more convoluted (we would need to parse it). Passing those as separate arguments gives us those "for free".

Example use-case 2

Somebody in the package @callstack/foo set the main field in their package.json to ./foo.node. A different user in their package (say whatever) writes:

const { foofighter } = require('@callstack/foo');

then our Babel plugin should output:

const { foofighter } = requireNodeAddon('./foo.node', '@callstack/foo', './package.json');

Following the steps from the "algorithm" above, the relative path would be resolved to ./foo.node (it used the path from main and ./package.json gives ./), which will be expected to be in the @callstack/foo package. The exact value of the last argument is not that important here (can be ./ or . as well).

Example use-case 3

Somebody in ./src/wrapper.js that's part of package foo wrote:

const fs = require('node:fs');

Our Babel plugin is expected to output this instead:

const fs = requireNodeAddon('node:fs', 'foo', './src/wrapper.js');

More flexible loader

One of the main goals of this proposal would be to "hide" the resolution algorithm in native code. The JavaScript side should not care whether the names are hashed or changed in any other way. The closer the original Node.js code, the better. Those 3 separate arguments: requiredPath, targetPackageName and fromSubpath gives more flexibility to the native loader. If all the addons are flattened into a single directory (like for iOS), the JS does not care -- the native loader will be able to implement this logic and try different search paths and variants.

Lastly, it shouldn't be hard to adapt this approach to support ES modules that use import and export.

Langage dominant
TypeScript
Étoiles
188
Forks
10
Merge moyen
2 j 17 h
PR mergées (30 j)
3

Guide de contribution

Aucun guide de contribution indexé pour ce dépôt

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Autres issues de callstackincubator/react-native-node-api

Toutes les issues de callstackincubator/react-native-node-api

Issues similaires

Plus d'issues TypeScript

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.