Hosted gem `rollback` / `remove` still strip the DEPENDENCIES `!` when the user's `source … do` block holds an assignment-form `v = if/case/begin … end`, so frozen installs fail on Bundler 4.0.19+
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
Évaluation
- Difficulté
- 4/5
- Temps estimé
- 3-5 jours
- Accessibilité débutants
- 25/100
Piste de recherche
Read crates/socket-patch-core/src/patch/redirect/upstream/gem.rs, starting with opens_keyword_block, in_source_block, and restore_one; the issue traces how an assignment-form keyword construct can pop the source block frame. Use the reproduction based on crates/socket-patch-cli/tests/e2e_redirect_gem_build.rs and the supplied Bundler 4.0.22 command to check rollback and remove. Done means the restored lock retains the !, the Gemfile is byte-identical, and a frozen install succeeds; linked PR #1478 is already open.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Description
[agent] Found by the scheduled Bundler (RubyGems) bug-hunt routine (ledger #316).
Summary
#1056 is closed (fixed by #1303), but one shape still breaks. If the user's source "…" do block contains an assignment-form keyword construct (v = if …, v = case …, v = begin …) before the patched gem, hosted rollback and remove still restore DEPENDENCIES as vuln-gem (= 1.0.0) without the !. Bundler pins a gem declared in a source block with !, so the restored lock no longer matches the Gemfile. On Bundler 4.0.19 and later, every frozen or deployment install then fails with exit 16. The unwind reports success (exit 0).
The previous bug-hunt run posted this as a comment on the closed #1056, where it is easy to miss. This issue tracks it on its own.
Impact
After socket-patch rollback or remove, CI and deploy checkouts that use BUNDLE_FROZEN / BUNDLE_DEPLOYMENT fail with "Your lockfile needs to be updated, but it can't be because frozen mode is set". The restored Gemfile also comes back dedented (gem "vuln-gem", "1.0.0" at column 0, after a blank line, inside the block), so it isn't byte-identical either.
Repro
I used a scratch copy of crates/socket-patch-cli/tests/e2e_redirect_gem_build.rs and changed only the Driver::ScanVexSourceBlock Gemfile to:
source "<up>/upstream"
source "<up>/upstream" do
v = if ENV["ZZ"]
"a"
else
"b"
end
gem "vuln-gem", "1.0.0"
end
Then I ran:
gem install bundler -v 4.0.22
BUNDLER_VERSION=4.0.22 SOCKET_PATCH_BUNDLER_E2E_VERSION=4.0.22 SOCKET_PATCH_BUNDLER_E2E_REQUIRED=1 \
cargo test -p socket-patch-cli --test <scratch copy> -- gem_hosted_unwind_keeps_a_source_block_bang --include-ignored --nocapture
Result: rollback exits 0, but the lock differs from the pristine lock only in the missing !:
- vuln-gem (= 1.0.0)!
+ vuln-gem (= 1.0.0)
The fresh-checkout BUNDLE_FROZEN=true bundle install then fails:
Your lockfile needs to be updated, but it can't be because frozen mode is set.
The same Gemfile without the v = if … end lines passes, which is what the existing test covers.
I also confirmed Bundler's side on its own, with no socket-patch involved. I took a real rubygems.org project (colorize 0.8.1 in the same block shape) and deleted only the !. On Bundler 4.0.22 the frozen install then exits 16, both with and without a CHECKSUMS section, and passes with the !. On 4.0.18 it only warns ("Cannot write a changed lockfile while frozen.") and exits 0.
Expected vs actual
- Expected: CLI_CONTRACT.md / docs/ecosystems.md ("Hosted unwind") say the restore re-derives the upstream lock, and #1056's fix made the
!survive for gems declared in a user source block. The lock should come back byte-identical (!included), and a frozen install of the restored pair should pass. - Actual: the
!is dropped and the frozen install fails.
Matrix (Linux, Ruby 3.3.6, main 15c2c83)
| Bundler | Shape | Lock byte-identical after rollback |
Frozen install of the restored pair |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0.22 | v = if … end |
no (×2) | fails, exit 16 (×2) |
| 4.0.18 | v = if … end |
no (×3) | passes with a "Cannot write a changed lockfile" warning |
| 4.0.18 / 2.6.9 | v = case … end (run 38, main 6ad6add) |
no | — |
| any | plain block, CRLF block (#1056 fix) | yes | passes |
macOS and Windows weren't probed. The logic is text-only and OS-independent.
Suspect code
crates/socket-patch-core/src/patch/redirect/upstream/gem.rs:586 (opens_keyword_block) only counts if/unless/case/begin/… as block openers when the keyword is the first token of the line. In v = if ENV["ZZ"], the first token is v, so no frame is pushed, but the matching end still pops one. That pop removes the user's source frame in in_source_block (gem.rs:541), and restore_one falls through to DepEntry::Unpin (gem.rs:899). The same problem probably applies to x = while …, x = until … and x = unless …, and to the dedent of the restored declaration.
- Langage dominant
- Rust
- Étoiles
- 8
- Forks
- 1
- Merge moyen
- 18 h 19 min
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 504
Préparer son environnement
- Aucun Dockerfile ni fichier Docker Compose
- Aucun modèle de pull request
- Lire le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Autres issues de SocketDev/socket-patch
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:npm priority:p3 ux
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 75/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1072 · 2 commentaires ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:yarn-berry priority:p1
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 73/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#783 · 1 commentaire ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Vendored cargo warns cargo_multi_version_old_cargo ("declares no rust-version") when the root package inherits rust-version from [workspace.package]Peut-être pris Une pull request liée à cette issue est ouverte ou déjà fusionnée. Ouverteagent:triaged bug bughunt pm:cargo priority:p2
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 84/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#651 · 3 commentaires ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
bug bughunt pm:npm
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 45/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1481 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Hosted gem scan ignores a Gemfile `lockfile "custom.lock"` DSL call (Bundler 4), so it pins the unused Gemfile.lock, leaves the real lock untouched, and every frozen install failsPeut-être pris @mikolalysenko l’a pris il y a 1 jour. Ouverteagent:claimed agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:bundler priority:p1
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 35/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1477 · 3 commentaires ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
Toutes les issues de SocketDev/socket-patch
Issues similaires
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 68/100
bytecodealliance/rustix#1703 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 3 jours
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 74/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
linux build warningOuverte
Difficulté 1/5 Moins d'une heure Accessibilité débutants 88/100
Pomax/vst-plugins#24 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
V1 manifest lists written by Java lose added/existing/deleted file countsPeut-être pris @kacper-li-airspace-intelligence l’a pris aujourd’hui. Ouverte
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 72/100
apache/iceberg-rust#3445 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 4 jours
-
Slack integration: links on self-hosted domains never unfurl (parseCapShareUrl only accepts cap.so / cap.link)Peut-être pris @mangeshraut712 l’a pris aujourd’hui. Ouvertebug
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 72/100
CapSoftware/Cap#2546 · 1 commentaire ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour