Hosted gem `rollback` / `remove` still strip the DEPENDENCIES `!` when the user's `source … do` block holds an assignment-form `v = if/case/begin … end`, so frozen installs fail on Bundler 4.0.19+
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100
Línea de trabajo
Read crates/socket-patch-core/src/patch/redirect/upstream/gem.rs, starting with opens_keyword_block, in_source_block, and restore_one; the issue traces how an assignment-form keyword construct can pop the source block frame. Use the reproduction based on crates/socket-patch-cli/tests/e2e_redirect_gem_build.rs and the supplied Bundler 4.0.22 command to check rollback and remove. Done means the restored lock retains the !, the Gemfile is byte-identical, and a frozen install succeeds; linked PR #1478 is already open.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
[agent] Found by the scheduled Bundler (RubyGems) bug-hunt routine (ledger #316).
Summary
#1056 is closed (fixed by #1303), but one shape still breaks. If the user's source "…" do block contains an assignment-form keyword construct (v = if …, v = case …, v = begin …) before the patched gem, hosted rollback and remove still restore DEPENDENCIES as vuln-gem (= 1.0.0) without the !. Bundler pins a gem declared in a source block with !, so the restored lock no longer matches the Gemfile. On Bundler 4.0.19 and later, every frozen or deployment install then fails with exit 16. The unwind reports success (exit 0).
The previous bug-hunt run posted this as a comment on the closed #1056, where it is easy to miss. This issue tracks it on its own.
Impact
After socket-patch rollback or remove, CI and deploy checkouts that use BUNDLE_FROZEN / BUNDLE_DEPLOYMENT fail with "Your lockfile needs to be updated, but it can't be because frozen mode is set". The restored Gemfile also comes back dedented (gem "vuln-gem", "1.0.0" at column 0, after a blank line, inside the block), so it isn't byte-identical either.
Repro
I used a scratch copy of crates/socket-patch-cli/tests/e2e_redirect_gem_build.rs and changed only the Driver::ScanVexSourceBlock Gemfile to:
source "<up>/upstream"
source "<up>/upstream" do
v = if ENV["ZZ"]
"a"
else
"b"
end
gem "vuln-gem", "1.0.0"
end
Then I ran:
gem install bundler -v 4.0.22
BUNDLER_VERSION=4.0.22 SOCKET_PATCH_BUNDLER_E2E_VERSION=4.0.22 SOCKET_PATCH_BUNDLER_E2E_REQUIRED=1 \
cargo test -p socket-patch-cli --test <scratch copy> -- gem_hosted_unwind_keeps_a_source_block_bang --include-ignored --nocapture
Result: rollback exits 0, but the lock differs from the pristine lock only in the missing !:
- vuln-gem (= 1.0.0)!
+ vuln-gem (= 1.0.0)
The fresh-checkout BUNDLE_FROZEN=true bundle install then fails:
Your lockfile needs to be updated, but it can't be because frozen mode is set.
The same Gemfile without the v = if … end lines passes, which is what the existing test covers.
I also confirmed Bundler's side on its own, with no socket-patch involved. I took a real rubygems.org project (colorize 0.8.1 in the same block shape) and deleted only the !. On Bundler 4.0.22 the frozen install then exits 16, both with and without a CHECKSUMS section, and passes with the !. On 4.0.18 it only warns ("Cannot write a changed lockfile while frozen.") and exits 0.
Expected vs actual
- Expected: CLI_CONTRACT.md / docs/ecosystems.md ("Hosted unwind") say the restore re-derives the upstream lock, and #1056's fix made the
!survive for gems declared in a user source block. The lock should come back byte-identical (!included), and a frozen install of the restored pair should pass. - Actual: the
!is dropped and the frozen install fails.
Matrix (Linux, Ruby 3.3.6, main 15c2c83)
| Bundler | Shape | Lock byte-identical after rollback |
Frozen install of the restored pair |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0.22 | v = if … end |
no (×2) | fails, exit 16 (×2) |
| 4.0.18 | v = if … end |
no (×3) | passes with a "Cannot write a changed lockfile" warning |
| 4.0.18 / 2.6.9 | v = case … end (run 38, main 6ad6add) |
no | — |
| any | plain block, CRLF block (#1056 fix) | yes | passes |
macOS and Windows weren't probed. The logic is text-only and OS-independent.
Suspect code
crates/socket-patch-core/src/patch/redirect/upstream/gem.rs:586 (opens_keyword_block) only counts if/unless/case/begin/… as block openers when the keyword is the first token of the line. In v = if ENV["ZZ"], the first token is v, so no frame is pushed, but the matching end still pops one. That pop removes the user's source frame in in_source_block (gem.rs:541), and restore_one falls through to DepEntry::Unpin (gem.rs:899). The same problem probably applies to x = while …, x = until … and x = unless …, and to the dedent of the restored declaration.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Rust
- Estrellas
- 8
- Forks
- 1
- Merge medio
- 17 h 5 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 557
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de SocketDev/socket-patch
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:npm priority:p3 ux
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1072 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:yarn-berry priority:p1
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 73/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#783 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Vendored cargo warns cargo_multi_version_old_cargo ("declares no rust-version") when the root package inherits rust-version from [workspace.package]Posiblemente ocupada @mikolalysenko la tomó hace 2 días. Abiertoagent:triaged bug bughunt pm:cargo priority:p2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#651 · 3 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug bughunt pm:npm
Dificultad 4/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1534 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:bundler priority:p1
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1531 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de SocketDev/socket-patch
Issues similares
-
Custom hosts written as trailing-dot FQDNs (`host.local.`) aren't detected as local backendsPosiblemente ocupada @roboomp la tomó hoy. Abiertobug prio:p2 providers triaged
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
can1357/oh-my-pi#15798 · 3 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
requires-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
apache/datafusion-comet#7001 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
-
builtin-port enhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
cmlarsen/writemorebetter#235 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Add a Storybook section to CONTRIBUTING.mdPosiblemente ocupada @ChanakyaG2004 la tomó hoy. Abiertodocumentation good first issue
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
FlowwStar/FlowStar#995 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día