Hacktoberfest 2026 : les issues que les mainteneurs ont marquées pour octobre, ouvertes et accessibles aux débutants. Parcourir les issues Hacktoberfest

Fuzz testing: analyze existing repository state

Ouverte
  • Quelque chose ne va pas ?
#982 2 commentaires 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub

Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Évaluation

Difficulté
4/5
Temps estimé
3-5 jours
Accessibilité débutants
45/100
Type d'issue
Documentation
Clarté
Clairement spécifiée
Activité
Calme
Stack technique
kotlin
Domaine
testing-qa

Piste de recherche

Start by searching the repository for randomized or property-based tests and inspecting test and CI configuration, including how JVM, native, and wasmJs tests run. Review the named parsing targets—skainet-io-gguf, skainet-io-safetensors, skainet-io-onnx, skainet-io-iree-params, tokenizer/BPE, skainet-lang, and skainet-compile—for relevant tests and TODOs or bug reports. Done means posting a concise evidence-based inventory and summary that can guide the design work in #981.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Description

assessment enhancement sub-issue

Sub-issue of #981 ("Enhance testing by adding fuzzing") — the A: ASSESS phase for that
proposal. Before designing or adopting anything, establish what's actually already here.

Goal

Inventory the repository's current state as it relates to fuzz testing, so #981's design phase
starts from facts rather than assumptions.

Tasks

  • Search for any existing property-based / generative tests across the codebase (kotlin.test
    custom generators, hand-rolled randomized tests, anything resembling fuzzing today) —
    distinguish these from ordinary parameterized/table tests.
  • Identify the highest-value fuzz targets: parsers and format readers are the classic fuzzing
    sweet spot — skainet-io-gguf (GGUF), skainet-io-safetensors, skainet-io-onnx,
    skainet-io-iree-params (irpa), the tokenizer/BPE code, and any binary/text format parsing
    in skainet-lang/skainet-compile.
  • Check current test coverage tooling/config (if any) and whether coverage data is already
    collected in CI, to know what a fuzzing effort would be building on top of vs. introducing
    from scratch.
  • Note existing CI structure relevant to adding a new test category (build-logic conventions,
    per-module test source sets, how jvmTest/native/wasmJs test execution differs — a fuzzer
    is realistically JVM-only to start, given tooling maturity, so this matters for scoping).
  • Flag any known crash/hang/OOM bug reports or TODO/FIXME comments near parsing code that
    a fuzzer would likely have caught, as motivating examples.

Output

A short written summary (as a comment on this issue, or a doc page) other contributors can use
to scope #981's actual implementation plan — not code, just ground truth about what exists today.

Related

  • Parent: #981
  • Companion sub-issue (ecosystem research, can run in parallel): link added after creation
Langage dominant
Kotlin
Étoiles
52
Forks
15
Merge moyen
1 j 8 h
PR mergées (30 j)
37

Préparer son environnement

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Autres issues de SKaiNET-developers/SKaiNET

Toutes les issues de SKaiNET-developers/SKaiNET

Issues similaires

Plus d'issues Kotlin

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.